Announcing the public launch of the Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund!
Please join us in helping defend Bitcoin open source developers against dangerous and damaging lawsuits with no merit brought by Craig Wright.
This kind of misleading propaganda is unfortunate. Smart money isn't going to fall for BitcoinCash or AltCoin
#1931
, but if main stream media is helping pump those things, the individual investor at home is going to be the one losing out.
@rogerkver
aka Bitcoin Jesus joins us tomorrow to discuss the biggest change to the crypto world since time was invented! Must see TV..
#BitcoinCash
is here... deal with it!!
I used to recommend Coinbase to many people. I’m not sure I will anymore. By listing these tokens they are putting a shiny polish on garbage and contributing to defrauding the public. I don’t want to be part of that.
Balaji, thank you so much! We are honored to receive this money and put it to use funding everything from Bitcoin security to Lightning development, as well as helping us educate the next generation of devs.
Greg is a singular figure but in exactly the opposite way. He’s the most brilliant thinker in the space. No one is perfect but he deserves great credit for all he’s contributed. I believe all BTCers owe him a debt of gratitude. In particular I’ve learned so much: Thanks Greg!
Thank you COPA
@opencryptoorg
!
Judge Mellor rules from the bench: CSW is not Satoshi. We've always known that, but it hasn't stopped untold damage to developers and other Bitcoiners. Thank you
@Coinbase
and
@Square
and everyone who supported COPA and the devs.
The quoted chart shows a totally unrealistic price for BitcoinCash that existed momentarily on one exchanges botched trading launch.
@CNBC
should have a higher standard for market prices.
This momentous day is the perfect time to finally post
@Excellion
's hat at the summit of Mt. Everest courtesy of
@patrickmauroii
!! Make Bitcoin Great Again!
#NO2X
I honestly don’t understand why some people assign such horrible motivations to an open group of collaborators. Do they think we are part of a grand conspiracy? I came from the outside and found Core open and welcoming.
@creslin
@petertoddbtc
No it doesn't, SegWit is itself absurdly complex, obfuscates the code for newcomers. Most of all, it lays the groundwork for a future that requires expert input from the same insular caste of expert.
Protip: if an ICO does volume bonuses ("buy at least $50000 of coins, get 20% more") then they do not understand the first thing about the egalitarian spirit of crypto (or at least, the egalitarian spirit that I believe crypto *should* have). Skip them.
Craig Wright is inconsequential. But this sets a good a example of how Bitcoin should respond to threats. In a distributed manner, with strength in numbers, and not being reliant on any small group of individuals or organizations.
Some of the Bitcoin community's most prominent voices (and also Facebook subsidiary Novi) are now hosting the Bitcoin White Paper – seemingly in response to Craig Wright's legal threats.
@zackseward
reports
@lopp
@iang_fc
So you want poor people to run a node to validate their own transactions at fees which they cannot afford...
Don't say LN.... If you do, then the transactions are off chain and they are no longer using their node to validate a majority of their transactions.
@OneMorePeter
@_jonasschnelli_
@blockchain
99% of Core Dev work has nothing to do with consensus changes. It’s valuable work that needs to be done. Reducing protocol development to a block size constant is naive.
I’m sad to see
@TheBlueMatt
go, but this is great news for
@sqcrypto
and Bitcoin! Helping build a new independent dev group is truly valuable.
Thanks Matt for all you’ve done for Bitcoin and for helping
@ChaincodeLabs
get where we are today!
Stop by and make us espresso often.
BIG NEWS: Please welcome
@TheBlueMatt
to Square Crypto. Woo! THINGS ARE HEATING UP EVERYBODY GET IN HERE LET’S PARTY 🌀🔥🌀🔥🌀🔥
*A lone figure watches from afar, their haunched shape a dark smudge against the gathering gray sky… Gary?*
This is the important nuance I have trouble explaining when people ask me about my views. I think Bitcoin will be the best money, but I’m open to being wrong, but the most likely outcomes are 0 or 1 coins succeed.
@ecurrencyhodler
I think most actual "maximalists" would happily use a different blockchain or perhaps even an entirely different tech if it better solved the problem of sound money that is resistant to censorship, inflation, and regulatory capture.
Testnet has a bad block (00000000eba3f43a8624750f39e4520a1678c0dbdf8707bfa4854a12fbf086c5) exploiting CVE-2018-17144. This is a good time to check to make sure your systems are updated and patched against this bug.
@JeremyRubin
@cz_binance
That’s among your worst ideas ever.
Who gets to decide when something should be reorged out?
We need to be building a social consensus around the way Bitcoin works and it ought to take a catastrophic event to agree to coordinate on a reorg.
This is an important point. Would be nice if Coinbase was a better citizen, but any resource can and will be abused, so consensus rules must limit extent of that. Large blocksize => more externalized cost.
This may not be a popular opinion, but I'm wary of blaming
@coinbase
or any other company or individual for the state of Bitcoin. If Bitcoin requires the participants to play fair and be altruistic, it's pointless. We need to do better, via tech, not pitchforks.
Nothing is making me angrier than
#Bitcoin
users getting angry at devs for this recent inflation bug. They have devoted, for free, years of their time and changed the course of human history. In doing so, they have made ONE mistake. Shame on you all.
@matthew_d_green
@zooko
It's time to draw a line in the sand on the CSW issue. We must start holding those who support him like
@jonmatonis
to account. It's not ok.
For 2X, there were two heights of interest: 494,782 - the last common block and 494,783 - the first forked block. The only height that was advertised, 494,784, is just completely wrong. This was a huge mistake, no way around that.
I’m with Cobra here. It’s a bad situation and he has tried to do why he thinks is best. Outside observers shouldn’t underestimate the damage Craig and Calvin are causing.
@adam3us
@glennhodl
@Daniel4141414
@TrotterMax
It's easy to be a critic when you don't have billionaire funded people trying to drag out litigation on technicalities (even deliberately avoiding letting me pay him).
The site is the same for the vast majority of users.
@jgarzik
You’re actually suggesting they auction listings? That is so absurdly unethical I don’t know where to start. We need to clean up this embarrassing mess of scams and snake oil our space has become.
@mikebelshe
@bendavenport
@lopp
There are many thousands of people who would trade every one of their BTC to keep its incorruptible properties. Those ppl give BTC its value
Some great material at the first Magical Crypto Conference. If you're "Bitcoin not Blockchain" (which you should be!) then you should forget about Consensus and watch this.
@BronxR
@socrates1024
No it shows me a bunch of CEOs want to control BTC. Many of them don't even have the support of their employees, let alone their customers.
@ErikVoorhees
@jgarzik
No. I will sell 2X regardless of hash/price and I will work on projects I find interesting which is not 2X. That's dedication to a vision.
It's probably even more directly "tainted" than that. All those transactions include coins that originally came from coinbases, most of which included fees derived from 1000's of transactions in other blocks. It's almost like trying to track the electrons that power your home.
There's no such thing as being OFAC Compliant. They can raise the bar arbitrarily. Did they check the electricity wasn't paid for with sanctioned money? Did they knowingly build on a block that wasn't clean? Who gets to bless the first immaculately conceived "clean" block anyway?
I know this should be a dead horse by now, but why is there anyone that can confirm anything on behalf of your cryptocurrency? If Bitcoin isn’t compliant, there is no one who can make it so. That is a critical feature.
Those affected by
@coinbase
UK issues: this is limited to Coinbase UK only. UK residents can still buy/sell Zcash through
@cex_io
. No other exchanges in the UK affected. To pre-empt speculation, we confirm that Zcash is 100% compatible with UK regulations & KYC/AML requirements.
This is well said. But there is a more fundamental question we should be asking, why should law enforcement have a right to access what's in our phones. Will we let them inside our brains when that technology exists?
@petertoddbtc
@mikebelshe
Or perhaps those are the people we should thank for acting responsibly. It's hard to admit you were wrong and reverse course, and it should be applauded.
@twobitidiot
I don’t think I could agree with this any less. And I admit you know much more about any one of these “projects” than I do. But....
No one should buy any of this stuff.
@OneMorePeter
@eric_lombrozo
That makes no sense. Core is an existing installed base with no planned changes. You were part of the small group that planned BTC1 changes
@twobitidiot
@blueRAP
@eric_lombrozo
Potential disaster. What happens if/when 2x fails or doesnt happen? Bitcoin will have proven resistance to manipulation. Most valuable trait
Well put!
Bitcoin is a very risky “investment”. Everything else is worse. A few are just riskier, most are worthless scams. If you can’t tell the difference, steer clear.
Disclaimer.
Cold truth: yes, you can do a lot of stupid things with
#bitcoin
too but as I told you before there are only 2 things to do.
Step 1: buy only Bitcoin. The quantity is how much you can afford to eventually lose.
step 2: HODL.
@ErikVoorhees
Nov2x will be like BCash, a side show for pump and dumpers (at best, will be completely avoidable disaster if no replay protection added).
@gavinandresen
Logic? Gavin, look at the futures, look at the polls, look at the nodes, look at meetups and social media. There is no support. Apply logic.