maxbillmann Profile Banner
Maximilian Billmann Profile
Maximilian Billmann

@maxbillmann

Followers
285
Following
962
Media
11
Statuses
551

Asst Prof @UniBonn @UniklinikBonn | dataScience, ML, funGenomics, CRISPRscreens | Postdoc @UMNComputerSci @DonnellyCentre | PhD @Michael_Boutros @wolfgangkhuber

Bonn, Germany
Joined August 2015
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@maxbillmann
Maximilian Billmann
2 years
Happy to share our critical evaluation of reproducibility metrics for context-specific CRISPR screens with my former colleagues @henrynward @Michael_Aregger @UMNComputerSci @DonnellyCentre and my first paper at @UniBonn @UniklinikBonn
3
8
22
@maxbillmann
Maximilian Billmann
24 days
🤣
0
0
0
@Sadagopan_A
Ananthan Sadagopan
1 month
Excited to share my project w/@srviswanathan on virtual CRISPR screening -- predicting cancer dependencies from RNA sequencing alone. On unseen rare tumors, nearly every predicted dependency validated experimentally! Creating a framework to rapidly go from patient → treatment
1
25
112
@maxbillmann
Maximilian Billmann
1 month
Core genetic and cellular principles seem to be stable across cell types - important for discovery.
@DrAnneCarpenter
Anne Carpenter, PhD
1 month
The answer is skin cells. Skin cells! That seems really odd, but lots of cells share lots of components and processes that are used in different ways in different cell types. And not-fun fact: psychotic symptoms are associated with skin abnormalities.
0
0
1
@slavov_n
Prof. Nikolai Slavov
2 months
Can we understand biology from "infinite" amounts of perturbation data ? - Only if we measure the relevant molecules. Perturbations and data scale 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐭 compensate for missing the relevant molecules. 🧵
7
35
152
@maxbillmann
Maximilian Billmann
2 months
Exactly.
@anshulkundaje
Anshul Kundaje
2 months
I'm really glad this re-evaluation was done but I just want folks to understand that when they see auROCs > 0.9 in any biological task, it is very rarely means they model is spectacular. It usually means the benchmark is severely flawed in some way. 1/
0
0
0
@randall_platt
Randall Platt
4 months
In @NatRevGenet we outline strategies for in vivo pooled (single cell) CRISPR screens for genotype → phenotype mapping in animal models. This contains over a decade of hard earned knowledge by us and the field. Kudos to @AntonioSantinha & Alessio Strano. https://t.co/xtSjG7Ep4v
2
7
54
@maxbillmann
Maximilian Billmann
4 months
Congrats @tschaharganeh, @BreinigMarco and colleagues! Great to see this out.
@tschaharganeh
Tschaharganeh Lab
4 months
We are happy to share our latest paper @natBME spearheaded by @BreinigMarco. Together with @MoritzGerstung we hack commercial #spatialtranscriptomics @10xGenomics to decode #phenotypes from #genotypes in #cancer: https://t.co/JTXzMkDiCW @DKFZ @uniklinik_hd
0
0
0
@emblebi
EMBL-EBI
4 months
The Perturbation Catalogue is here! A new platform unifying perturbation data from CRISPR screens, multiplexed variant effect assays and gene expression data in one place. The beta version is now live. Find out more and try the platform: https://t.co/l45kuYPVGN
1
1
9
@maxbillmann
Maximilian Billmann
4 months
Worth wrapping your head around this
@lpachter
Lior Pachter
4 months
aka PCA
0
0
1
@NatureAging
Nature Aging
5 months
Online now!✨RESEARCH: Sun et al perform a CRISPR/Cas9 screen in aged mice and identify Clusterin as a driver of myeloid bias in aged HSCs, via regulation of mitochondria https://t.co/obLp8sfL3q
Tweet card summary image
nature.com
Nature Aging - Performing a CRISPR–Cas9 screen in aged mice, Sun and colleagues identify clusterin as a driver of myeloid-biased hematopoietic stem cell differentiation in aging, through...
0
5
22
@maxbillmann
Maximilian Billmann
5 months
Agreed! We cannot "wet lab" our way through the entire matrix of genes x genes x cell types x environments.
@LukeGilbertSF
LukeGilbert
5 months
Excited to see the Virtual Cell competition hosted by Arc Institute. We cant "wet lab" our way through the entire matrix of genes x cell types x environments of interest in biology. Cell state models will accelerate progress. https://t.co/NYflPphVT6
0
0
2
@maxbillmann
Maximilian Billmann
5 months
RT @mo_lotfollahi: Integration metrics for batch effects evaluates could be hacked! @hcwww_ and Aviv picked this up and proposed new metric…
0
1
0
@maxbillmann
Maximilian Billmann
6 months
Agree. 25% is pretty good. What is the bigger challenge - FP or FN?
@blekhman
Ran Blekhman
6 months
Counter point -- a 25% replication rate is remarkable given the complexity and variability in living systems Innovative methods, resource limitations, publication bias, and data complexity all affect results. This isn't about "good science", but the nature of biological research
0
0
0
@NadigAjay
Ajay Nadig
7 months
Our paper has been published @NatureGenet! Through new statistical methods, we shed light on fundamental questions about cellular response to genetic perturbations. Our work is a substantial advance towards rigorous characterization and comparison of massive perturbation atlases.
@NadigAjay
Ajay Nadig
1 year
How do genetic perturbations change cells? How are these effects shaped by cell type and dosage? How do we best extract insight from modern massive perturbation atlases? Im pleased to share a new preprint where we develop a suite of statistical approaches to these Qs (link below)
6
23
125
@SPJacksonGroup
Steve Jackson Lab
7 months
Thrilled to see this “veritable tour de force” led by @John_C_Fielden from @jcornlab out @nature, https://t.co/p0VlZXgE4k. This @ERC_Research funded project uses #CRISPRi to systematically scan 548 DDR genes for synthetic lethal interactions, ~150,000 pairwise combinations!
2
5
23