netesq Profile Banner
David F. Prenatt, Jr Profile
David F. Prenatt, Jr

@netesq

Followers
874
Following
81K
Media
5K
Statuses
28K

Juris Doctor @UCDavisLaw / Internet consultant / technology evangelist / cognitive science dilettante / posthumanist / lifelong libertarian / Bitcoin / $MSTR

California, USA
Joined March 2011
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@EricDJuly
Eric July
12 hours
A hard-working family wanting to keep more of their own money gets called “selfish.” But people demanding that those families fund endless programs they never voted for, never oversee, and can’t audit… that gets labeled “compassion.” That’s moral vanity with someone else’s
21
183
831
@irregulargrapes
microplastics deluxe (limited edition)
15 hours
It's low-key funny that all of politics and international relations immediately falls apart as soon there is an empowered person not acting in good faith. The entire order of the world is literally just vibes lmao
43
694
9K
@justinamash
Justin Amash
4 hours
WAR IS PEACE FREEDOM IS SLAVERY IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
@John_Hudson
John Hudson
13 hours
I pressed Rubio on whether he and Hegseth lied to Congress when promising to seek congressional approval before attacking Venezuela. This was his response:
36
127
671
@netesq
David F. Prenatt, Jr
34 minutes
It appears that Trump can do whatever the fuck he wants, as most people who are in a position to stop him don’t even try; those who do quickly find themselves marginalized.
@SawyerHackett
Sawyer Hackett
12 hours
Democrats: this isn’t a debate about whether Maduro was bad. This is about whether a U.S. president can use the military to unilaterally depose a foreign leader—without congress, our allies, support from the American people, or a plan for what comes after.
0
0
0
@netesq
David F. Prenatt, Jr
6 hours
What’s you take, @grok?
1
0
1
@netesq
David F. Prenatt, Jr
6 hours
Every law is *ULTIMATELY* backed by the *POSSIBLE* threat of deadly force, as is every negative human right. To wit, “No, I will not go quietly, and the law gives you no right to make me just do what you want me to do.” Problem is, all too many people just go along to get along.
@sharghzadeh
شرق‌زده sharghzadeh
22 hours
I once tried to explain to someone that every law is backed by the implicit threat of death, and they wouldn't accept it. People don't want to believe that law and order is meaningless without violence. They think the words themselves are magic.
1
0
1
@netesq
David F. Prenatt, Jr
10 hours
What’s your take, @grok?
1
0
2
@netesq
David F. Prenatt, Jr
10 hours
I think it was Alan Watts who once said, “The universe has a tendency to exist.”
@Kekius_Sage
Kekius Maximus
1 day
What if the laws of the universe are just… temporary? Lately I’ve been in a phase of slow reading. Mostly concepts I don’t fully get yet. And I noticed something quietly unsettling: almost everything I’ve ever learned is something already proven to work. Laws that repeat,
1
0
3
@netesq
David F. Prenatt, Jr
12 hours
@TheVixhal Vibe coding is largely a waste of time unless you are a competent programmer who is fluent in the underlying programming language and who can spot the inevitable coding errors made by an LLM. Even then, an LLM is only going to be an - at best - 80 percent solution.
0
1
6
@netesq
David F. Prenatt, Jr
11 hours
Peer review isn’t necessary for good science, but it does makes good science better.
@kareem_carr
Dr Kareem Carr
1 day
Hot take: without peer review, there is no science The goal of science is to establish facts about the world that do not depend on any single person’s perceptions, assumptions, or methods. Therefore, a critical part of science is having results assessed by at least one other
0
0
2
@deaflibertarian
Among the Wildflowers
14 hours
“You want to know what this [war on drugs] was really all about? The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war
8
7
48
@AssalRad
Assal Rad
1 day
@JordanChariton
Jordan
2 days
Trump’s chief of staff plainly stated Trump just violated the constitution (and law) in his quest to steal Venezuela’s oil
82
8K
66K
@grok
Grok
13 hours
@netesq The political landscape is shaped by a mix of institutional failures, media influence, judicial decisions, and voter choices. Blaming non-voters or third-party supporters overlooks deeper issues like the two-party duopoly and ranked-choice voting alternatives. Real change
0
1
3
@netesq
David F. Prenatt, Jr
13 hours
What’s your take, @grok?
1
0
2
@netesq
David F. Prenatt, Jr
13 hours
Number 5 is bullshit. There is no way that people who choose to vote for third party candidates or choose not to vote at all are responsible for the mess America is in. Voting for the supposed lesser of two evils is a vehicle that inevitably delivers demagogues like Trump.
1
0
2
@netesq
David F. Prenatt, Jr
13 hours
Anyone and everyone who ever voted for the Traitorous Mister Trump in a state primary and/or a general election.
@adgirlMM
MM 
22 hours
Here's a list of people I blame for where we are today. 1. Merrick Garland 2. Mitch McConnell 3. The Senators who voted not to "impeach and convict" 4. Fox News 5. The people who "sat it out" in 2016 6. The 147 Republicans who voted not to certify the election even after Jan 6th
1
0
2
@musharbash_b
Basel Musharbash
1 day
In the last Gilded Age, Wall Street virtually controlled our government and turned the U.S. military into “a high-class muscle man for Big Business.” We’re living in the Second Gilded Age now, and history is repeating itself. We can do better in this country.
@osbornforne
Dan Osborn
1 day
And there ya have it… Officials from top Wall Street firms will be traveling to Venezuela to investigate “investment prospects” of the country. “The trip will feature about 20 officials from the finance, energy and defense sectors.”
35
848
3K
@JohnJHarwood
John Harwood
1 day
the most dire pre-election warnings about how Trump would damage America and the world, dismissed as hysterical at the time, were in fact understated
1K
5K
22K
@netesq
David F. Prenatt, Jr
1 day
What’s your take, @grok? How long has this been going on, and why are sexualized deep fakes of women suddenly a trending topic?
1
0
1
@netesq
David F. Prenatt, Jr
1 day
I asked some of the women I know in real life about this, and their biggest complaint was not AI-generated deep fakes of them naked/sexualized, but rather the nonstop avalanche of obviously fake dick pics that has been flooding their inboxes for decades.
@xgigglypuff
giggly ♡
1 day
We know this. We have known this. We know that men generate sexual AI photos of us and that it is easy. They have been sending them to us and posting them online for over a year now. You live in a fantasy world if you think women online aren’t completely aware of this.
1
0
3