Matt Timberlake
@mjtimber2
Followers
667
Following
27K
Media
8K
Statuses
46K
Dad. Husband. Materials scientist. Pseudo Contractor. @OhioState & @UMich, Big pharma ask/pay you to lie? Learn about Qui Tam whistleblowing!
California
Joined February 2016
Lots of people promote the idea that Covid measures “don’t do anything”. Masks don’t do anything. Vaccines don’t do anything*. Social distancing doesn’t do anything. Lockdowns don’t do anything. Covid doesn’t do anything. Cumulative effect of them “not doing anything”.
114
24
108
Doctor who plainly is against Covid vaccines, and likely implements this in his practice, is seeing more pregnancy related complications. Is confused by this and implicates vaccines. Reality: vaccines reduce pregnancy related complications. The question he should be asking.
@jathorpmfm @jsm234 I have witnessed more pregnancy-related and overall health complications since the COVID gene therapy injections were released than at any time in my prior 30+ year experience of practicing OBGYN. I agree w Dr. Thorp's analysis of the evidence.
3
3
6
@MartinKulldorff Yep, definitely a censor, they even censored themselves! 😢
0
0
1
Kulldorff et al putting together a rose colored glasses rebuttal to a NY Times editorial. I'd say the tint is so heavy that they can't see much at all. https://t.co/NKq3YFUAPM
@Bryce_Nickels 1) "If our surmise of six million cases is accurate, that’s a mortality rate of 0.01%... Such a low death rate would be cause for optimism." Works out to 33k deaths as his prediction. 1/ https://t.co/ZJ1eFpP41U
0
0
1
Happen to be traveling at the moment, but somehow the northern lights are (sort of) visible in Virginia. 🤷♂️ The phone is doing a lot of the light collection here.
0
2
3
Berenson, fresh off his title as the pandemic's wrongest man, is upset that the New York Times is saying that Covid was zoonotic. He no doubt thinks that it was developed in the WIV lab, because of course he does. And why does he think it came from WIV? https://t.co/sxeohcXLWE
lol NYT today on bird flu. They just can’t help themselves, they lie even when they don’t have to, it’s a reflex
2
1
2
Poor Sheldon, he legitimately thinks all cause mortality is lowered by classifying a death as Covid. Does he not know the meaning of the word "all"? Or was it "cause" that tripped him up? Perhaps "mortality" isn't in his vocabulary?😂 https://t.co/1gN7uUpW7P
5
0
24
The endless parade of data continues, showing that turbo cancer was never and will never be a thing associated with vaccines. Not even any excess to explain this time. Country after country after country after country...
🚨 New study showing cause-specific excess mortality in Nordic countries! Cancer deaths within the expected ranges for Denmark, Finland, Sweden & Norway throughout 2020–2022. No sign of "turbo cancer" since vaccination. https://t.co/8f7LjI6glE
49
8
71
@HopiNg66966500 @DrHenryEaly @DrJBhattacharya @DrAseemMalhotra @drsimonegold @ZelenkoZev @DrJamesOlsson @P_McCulloughMD @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @shanejett Thank you for coming clean and telling us the real issue. You refused to take the vaccine, suffered consequences over it, and now make up rationalizations to pretend you made the correct choice. It would be so damaging to accept these graphs that you instead make up fairy tales.
5
1
15
Says I haven’t made a case for the US EVER having 1% IFR. And in the same post, links a paper that shows an IFR of 1.28% for the US in April 2020. Sometimes you just have to hand them the shovel, and they dig the hole for you.
@mjtimber2 @AtomsksSanakan @lotuna_ @cliftonaduncan @NateSilver538 And you have not made a case, at all, that 1% was ever a real, generalized hazard in the pre-vaccine period. For old people, yeah. But not everyone. https://t.co/xA3KOWVYlW
6
0
8
The year in travel, 2023. New Zealand for a month, Australia for 5, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea for 1, and South Korea, Japan, Austria, Lichtenstein, Switzerland, and Germany for another. Whew. Lots of long travel days, and amazing people and places. RE: @Hicksyfern
4
1
12
Anti-vaxxers can be hilarious. But anti-virus guys are the BEST! Here is this moron who is "recording the results for posterity" of me quoting the judge, and saying the judge's quote misrepresents a court case. THE SAME JUDGE THAT RULED ON IT! 😂
@mjtimber2 @18DellaLia37961 @MattJam28 Unfortunately falsely misrepresenting a court case is a crime in Germany. As I said before I am very calm.
10
0
13
Entitlement, mixed in with some light conspiracy. But he no doubt is fully aware of how study sections work, they simply didn’t score those grants as highly as others. I’m sure there are thousands of junior researchers more than willing to trade places with his “only” 1 R01.
By October, 2023, career citations from my research program have exceeded 100,000 in google scholar including 400 manuscripts cited at least 10 times and 127 manuscripts cited at least 127 times. For the @theNCI reviewers who have rejected our research grants in the last couple
2
0
2
Addendum with an addendum: it’s similar to Jessica Hack It’s abuse of this study, where most of the ventilated patients were still in hospital at the time they released the study. So while few ventilated patients would have been released, many had died. https://t.co/aA78O7T9kv
jamanetwork.com
In the Original Investigation titled “Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area” published online April 22,...
1
0
10
The reason claims were denied is overwhelmingly for filing issues, which will be tossed early. No medical records, missed deadlines, and wrong product. So 83% are plainly not representative. And the remain 214 were likely among the easier cases. Just more Ben nonsense. 3/3
3
1
18
He claims 97.5% of claims are rejected, while acknowledging that 89.4% aren’t even decided. 😂 What he wants to say is that 97.5% of those cases with adjudication have been rejected. Does that seem like a valid methodology? Definitely not. A HUGE bias. 2/3
1
0
16
Ben is the gift that keeps on giving. Just awful at any sort of biostatistical analysis. I’m a bit surprised that ONLY 12,233 claims have been filed. Pretty amazingly low considering the visibility. But that barely even scrapes the surface of how absurd this tweet is. 1/3
6
4
50
@allangmiller1 @QuocplusA @StevenWilson777 @k_b_lvi @Johnincarlisle Come on. Every anti-vaxxer has a little fling with ONS data. It’s always an abusive relationship and ends badly. Badmouthing, denying its qualities, insisting the relationship never happened!
5
2
11