What Wikipedia did: we stood strong for our principles and fought to the Supreme Court of Turkey and won. This is what it means to treat freedom of expression as a principle rather than a slogan.
@mattyglesias
Did your brain fall out of your head, Yglesias? The choice is have Twitter throttled in its entirety or limit access to some tweets. Which one do you want?
If the NHS will to support it, I could roll out the German Corona-Warn-App (privacy respecting, official diagnosis rather than self-reporting as I understand it) in short time at zero cost to the taxpayers.
If the government can't pull themselves together, we can.
Please RT.
I love Turkey. I love the Turkish culture and people. The beautiful city of Istanbul... great food, great wine, great culture. I call on Erdogan to unblock Wikipedia and to listen to the people!
#tamam
#wemissturkey
@QuantumObserver
I'm not sure what you're asking me. How much does "the left-wing" pay me? I would say zero but again I'm not really sure what you mean.
Fast moving claims and counter claims, and
@elonmusk
has removed all the core features that made it even remotely possible to tell real journalists from fakes.
Joke: A man rings 999 in a panic. "My wife is 9 months pregnant and has just started screaming!" "What is she saying?" "She is ranting about Jews!" "Don't worry, it only means she's gone into Labour..."
@SimaoPedroS
This is not true, sorry. I mean, of course, the Portuguese Wikipedia community edits Wikipedia all the time, editing, updating, debating, discussing.
But we do not bend to the will of governments, anywhere.
@GSR6669
@LynAldenContact
Just FYI, this is completely untrue. We did not change the definition of recession. There was no request from the US Government. It. Didn't. Happen.
Wherever you are getting your information from - check again.
@gianttinderbox
Sure - it's a mix. The majority are elected by the community through an open process. Some are selected for specific expertise (audit experience as an easy example). And then there's me.
@nickiminachhh
@Wikipedia
I don't recommend that you do that - it is important to join the discussion. In actual fact, the article was incredibly poorly written and has zero sources.
This isn't about religious sentiments, it's about not putting junk into Wikipedia.
@nickiminachhh
@Wikipedia
Wikipedia doesn't work like that. We engage in serious rational discussion. It's very different from the madhouse of twitter.
WATCH | Corbyn exposed on the anti-Semitic filth he's let fester in his party. Corbyn evades and squirms and refuses to apologise to Britain's Jewish population - utterly disgraceful! Bravo to
@afneil
- a proper broadcaster who nails it every time
#andrewneilinterviews
I am sitting in Singapore reading a newspaper online that I can't read in Europe due to bad laws in Europe. Think about that. And Europe is getting worse.
@MDjava
@katfan4eva
I did criticize that on many occasions. Pay attention. I have been criticizing people for going along with rights violations for many years.
@nickiminachhh
@Wikipedia
Hi Nicki,
Wikipedia doesn't work that way. We don't accept payment to include things, nor to delete them.
The relevant discussion is here:
The government are ramming through this Online Safety Bill even though it is a travesty of justice which will make the UK Internet obviously less safe. 1/
You, the Internet user, have lost a huge battle today in Internet parliament. The free and open internet is being quickly handed over to corporate giants at the expense of ordinary people. This is not about helping artists, it is about empowering monopolistic practices.
@QuantumObserver
I don't know what you're talking about really. But no, I don't get paid by "the left wing". I mostly make money from giving speeches at corporate events and tech conferences globally.
Your marketing materials need to be updated immediately - as people seem to be reading this as some kind of endorsement from me. I'm coming to speak my mind, which includes that BSV offers nothing for Wikipedia and that there is zero chance we would ever use it.
If you're avoiding Reddit now, I'm currently building a community-led and funded project. It's not done by any means, but I think you would enjoy it. We even have a draft API!
Test :
API docs:
Donate:
@sedboihourz
@nickiminachhh
@Wikipedia
Did you look at the article? Please do so and then try to tell me with a straight face that it was quality.
Wikipedia is not about "lefts propaganda" - that's just a slur by people who haven't bothered to actually look into it.
The New York Times is protected by Section 230, and by the First Amendment. Facebook is protected by Section 230, and by the First Amendment. There is no such thing in Section 230 as the distinction between a "publisher" and a "platform".
Here's Boris Johnson's record.
And here's the Labour candidate who can beat him at the next General Election.
Campaign with us this Sunday to
#Unseat
@BorisJohnson
:
The government of the United States has just announced a lawsuit over my memoir, which was just released today worldwide. This is the book the government does not want you to read: (link corrected)
I remember when eBay was the terrifying thing: "Someone is selling their baby on eBay!". I remember when Wikipedia was the terrifying thing: "OMG there's an error in Wikipedia."
Now, ChatGPT is the terrifying thing. And...
DeepSeek, a new AI chatbot from China. Because it is from China, I thought I would ask it a sensitive question - I asked it about the Chinese government's censorship of China. Watch what happened next.
Could everyone help me get this message to as many MEP's as you can: "I am only asking you to vote NO tomorrow on the European Copyright Directive so that we can have real debate in the EU Parliament in September. Democracy requires it. -- Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia"
@nickiminachhh
@sedboihourz
@Wikipedia
Reliable sources for a start. You have zero references, much less references to quality sources. The fact that this probably belongs as a part of another article (I can't say for sure) would also be a valid question to discuss.
@techUK
Speak for yourself. To whatever extent I am a voice within the UK tech sector, I am calling on MPs to back a People's Vote. And I will campaign that we vote to reject this whole nonsense.
@DanielKrawisz
@Ckatoshi
@Wikipedia
That isn't how blockchain works. That suggestion - to force people to strongly identify and pay for the privilege of editing Wikipedia - is a bad idea independently. And ot would be easy and cheap to implement without blockchain.
A Florida woman who ran a Trump supporters page that unwittingly promoted a Russian-coordinated event on Facebook says she doesn’t believe that she was influenced by Kremlin-linked trolls
@elonmusk
@micsolana
Elon kindly take a moment to read this:
Reading too much Twitter nonsense is making you stupid. Call me next week if you want a real discussion.
@elonmusk
@elonmusk
@bitcloud
I wonder if you care to respond to my specific criticism. The other night, a blue tick account pretending to be an Al Jazeera reporter had significant success spreading misinformation. It is now more difficult, thanks to the removal of legacy blue ticks, to identify such fraud.
Excited to attend Shabbat dinner in Davos tonight. Many VIPs in attendance. Possibly even the Israeli Honorary Consul of the Marshall Islands
@rahavran
! Will look for his parking space on the way in!
Banning end to end encryption is impossible. Attempts to do so are idiotic. If you care about online safety then you need to embrace strong encryption. Anyone against strong encryption is against online safety. End of story.
@nickiminachhh
@ajaatPandit
@Wikipedia
Of course there are a great many things that should be deleted from Wikipedia. New bad things are entered and deleted every day. This is the normal operation of Wikipedia.
Twitter lynch mobs aren't really helpful to the pursuit of truth.
@bitcloud
@elonmusk
Wikipedians are not journalists. And it isn't about whether someone "calls themself" a journalist. It's that institutional affiliation being faked (as it was tonight) is a bad thing for knowledge and understanding. I'm sure you agree, right?
@VoteBlue022
I sort of think you don't really care but I'm actually a big supporter of free markets. You might want to think a bit more about what that means.
@michaelplis
I don't know about on youtube but I agree with you that a straightforward and concise explanation would be helpful.
There's a lot on Wikipedia's community-written help pages, but we tend to be super wordy.
In 2001
@Wikipedia
was launched. Thank you to the millions of Wikipedians who have contributed to the web's biggest encyclopedia over the last 18 years.
#Web30
#ForTheWeb
@elonmusk
@bitcloud
I think that was a real mistake, and this is the real problem as a result of that mistake. The original purpose of blue ticks - to help readers assess the source of information in a tweet - was destroyed.
That's not good.
Insulting Wikipedia is not relevant to this question.
If Trump's dying corrupt Presidency succeeds in repealing the most important free speech provision after the 1st Amendment, I am going to be very cross and there will be consequences.
Everyone please relax. The technology to look up a postcode in a database and return a number 1, 2, or 3 was only invented in the 1950s. It's still quite hard.
@ajaatPandit
@nickiminachhh
@Wikipedia
Not "suddenly" - we've always been very strict.
Anyone can try to edit - and cry their eyes out if they do it badly and their work is deleted. Nothing new in that.
Twitter, except every tweet is a neutral fact based article worked on by many people so that it educates rather than destroys your brain. I call it Wikipedia.
Remember that 9/11 "truthers" are still with us today.
For the next 20 years, 2020 Election "truthers" will be with us, insisting there was massive fraud despite all evidence pointing the other way.
Both should be treated with as much reverence as "flat earthers".
I'm working on it but need support to see it through. is about to release a totally revamped version - I wouldn't have announced it early but this twitter stuff makes it timely.
@John_Hempton
@elonmusk
Seems to me that someone like a
@jimmy_wales
(of Wikipedia) or some of the good folks getting fired from Twitter have got to be able to set up an alternative platform and figure out a way to make the move en masse as painless as possible. Technology isn't the barrier, I suspect.
I just saw the expression "dog racism" trending and I thought well the problem is that the American Bully XL has no sense of English irony despite having lived here all their lives.
The only longterm route to peace, prosperity, and freedom is knowledge. Wikipedia's 20th birthday is next Friday. Please support us, and support my passion for a more thoughtful, more educated world.