
Erik Hoel
@erikphoel
Followers
21K
Following
20K
Media
2K
Statuses
19K
Placeholder for the scientist and author. Mostly on Substack not Twitter. https://t.co/CKyLzw5bHK
Joined November 2013
I once knew a guy in college who couldn't imagine pictures. He said he got a flicker of an image while reading the part of Paradise Lost where Lucifer raises a flaming sword to storm the gates of heaven, and that was the only image he ever saw in his mind.
35
166
3K
John von Neumann has become the poster-child for scientific genius lately. Probably because of the current thinking that genius = high IQ + rationality. But actually von Neumann envied Einstein, the greater scientist, because Einstein had something he lacked.
As great as Einstein is, he comes no where close to the brilliance of von Neumann. It’s an error of history that he’s not the most eminent scientist.
91
300
3K
btw my jaw dropped when I found this. Why is this number so high? How do 37% of *all* children in the US get reported to Child Protective Services at some point?.
10. That number is extremely high! Right?. Unfortunately, no. It’s pretty much identical to the national average (the base rate). Here’s the cumulative risk of triggering a CPS report by age 18 (from researchers):
136
115
2K
1. Today I am resigning my professorship at Tufts University to write on @SubstackInc full time. Here's why:
78
98
975
The reason this sort of IQ pop-analysis (now 10% of all tweets) is so stupid is that scores are unstable at higher levels. Finding the difference between 120 and 150 can’t be done because it’s the same person on different days
There are things that people of 70 IQ theoretically can’t do - for example abstract concepts become really hard to understand. I want to see simple examples of things a 120 IQ person can’t do (but 150 can). Or what a 150 IQ person can’t do (but 180 can).
24
32
462
The big personal news is that, thanks to @drmichaellevin, I will be returning to Tufts University to pursue this (especially with an eye toward some *very* interesting applications for his own work - so stay tuned).
🚨 New paper, and big personal news! 🧵. First, I just published a new theory of emergence. It traverses the dimension reductions of a system, treating each scale like a 2D slice of a 3D object, looking for what each adds causally and irreducibly.
33
18
391
@dwarkesh_sp A few reasons but one is that genetic determinism is wrong and drivers of progress aren’t just spawned naturally, they have to be carefully constructed under fragile conditions.
13
9
301
11. That didn’t stop @sciam from associating homeschooling with abuse, since they didn’t bother to check whether their shocking numbers were any different from a random sample of the population.
1
23
303
@takuiten How much money you can pay for extracurricular activities and private school, apparently.
6
6
273
@galo2099 It's a meta-analysis, so there's more than one study in the dancing category. I think you can criticize the result by pointing out that confidence rating for them is "low" but it's still a massive effect and there are other "low" categories without that.
7
0
254
I'm not the first to point this out, but here are some very cool stories of memories across heart transplants that I found as part of this.
Non-neuronal cells look increasingly like neurons, with the same memory pathways. Meaning that nutritionists are confused for the same reason neuroscientists usually are: your body is a mathematical black-box, with its output your morphology.
9
24
261
IIT is already being changed to be tagged as "pseudoscience" on Google as well as "pseudoscience" on Wikipedia as well.
Yesterday a letter from 100 scientists declared the popular theory of consciousness - Integrated Information Theory - is "pseudoscience.". And that media about it is "scientific misinformation." . The letter is bad. Here's my reply why:
16
16
230
Scientists aren't usually open about this stuff, so I will be: a lot of this came to me in dreams. I dreamed some systems were like the rocks carved by wind, ventifacts, top-heavy with macroscale structure.
🚨 New paper, and big personal news! 🧵. First, I just published a new theory of emergence. It traverses the dimension reductions of a system, treating each scale like a 2D slice of a 3D object, looking for what each adds causally and irreducibly.
13
19
229
@loobah_l Someone else questioned exactly that too - how much is driven by contentious divorces.
2
0
217