andrewpolk81 Profile Banner
andrew polk Profile
andrew polk

@andrewpolk81

Followers
3K
Following
529
Media
72
Statuses
1K

Co-founder @triviumchina. China economist in DC, after 10 years in Beijing. Erstwhile Texan. Check out my work here: https://t.co/bQR2IvJ3HP

Beijing
Joined September 2011
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
2 years
RT @ryanl_hass: US-PRC relations are off track. Risks of conflict are rising, while benefits from the relationship for American and Chinese….
0
94
0
@grok
Grok
5 days
Join millions who have switched to Grok.
201
404
3K
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
I’m no big @elonmusk fan. But the commentary on this move from people who’ve never run a business is amazing. If implemented, on a very conservative projection, it brings in $1 billion in new annual revenue, a boost of 20%. I’d take that over “considerable economic value” any day.
@JamesSurowiecki
James Surowiecki
3 years
Great example of how weird Musk's plan to charge power users for verification is. AOC has 13.5 million followers. When she writes a tweet like this, it generates millions of impressions, creating considerable economic value for Twitter. And he wants to charge her $8 to do it!
Tweet media one
3
0
8
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
Last weekend there was a coup. This weekend zero-covid will be dropped at any moment. Thank god there are only two more weekends before the party congress.
3
4
48
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
Xi and co not wearing masks at National Day celebration is not a signal of coming Covid policy relaxation. Here’s Xi in Liaoning six weeks ago. Covid control policy has only tightened since then.
Tweet media one
@ShanghaiMacro
Shanghai Macro Strategist
3 years
Senior leaders, including President Xi, did not wear masks during today’s National Day celebration events. Onshore investors broadly perceive this as another important signal for a potential recalibration of zero covid next year.
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
Tweet media three
1
4
12
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
RT @NeysunM: Agree and disagree with Bill here. Agree in the sense that, of course, XJP policies and especially "zero COVID" right now are….
0
1
0
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
RT @NeysunM: Me, writing in @ChinaFile in Aug 2020 >> The @FT just published today . (Not a dig. Just sayin I’ve been howling in the wind a….
0
11
0
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
Any way you slice it, to us it all means that China’s zero-COVID policy will be in place well into 2023. And that means all attendant disruptions to life, business, travel, economic growth, etc – will stick around for a while as well. 15/15.
9
10
65
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
Key takeaway: Beijing will have a slightly higher tolerance for COVID-related social unrest after the party congress – but that doesn’t mean officials will significantly adjust the current calculus regarding the tradeoffs between economic growth and COVID-related lockdowns. 14/15.
1
4
37
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
And again: Once that decision is made, it will take months just to message that it is coming – let alone to gradually put the new policies into place. 13/15.
1
0
29
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
Instead, officials will need to see a combination of extremely low rates of infection, subdued hospitalization and death rates, increased rates of inoculation, widely available therapeutics, and (ideally) increasingly weaker variants before changing course. 12/15.
2
5
32
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
Similarly, there is no single metric either – whether that be vaccination rates for the general population, or the elderly, or a certain amount of available therapeutics – that officials are watching in order to kick off a policy adjustment. 11/15.
1
2
29
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
Rather than looking for a clear-cut pivot point, coinciding with some arbitrary date or event, we are looking for COVID policy adjustments to take place via step-by-step, gradual technical tweaks – much like the shortened quarantine requirements for inbound travelers in June10/15.
1
1
35
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
Equally important to keep in mind is that China’s leaders aren't working on an artificial deadline. There is no single milestone – whether a major political event or random date on the calendar – that policymakers are looking to as a pivotal moment to adjust pandemic policy. 9/15.
1
3
37
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
Based on those requirements alone, the earliest possible window for any meaningful relaxation of China’s zero-COVID playbook would be in the spring of 2023 – a view we have held since the beginning of this year. 8/15.
3
7
51
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
Again, a shift immediately after the congress is pretty much out of the question by this point because any future rollback must be carefully and thoroughly messaged – for several weeks, if not months – to lay the groundwork for a step-by-step, gradual adjustment to the policy7/15.
1
2
44
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
For our money, it’s much more straightforward to define why – and when – the policy won’t get rolled back. Starting with the obvious: Zero-COVID ain’t going nowhere before the Party congress. 6/15.
1
2
44
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
It is true that the risk calculation for senior leaders getting infected abroad seems to have changed. However, this is a necessary-but-insufficient condition for policymakers to abandon the zero-COVID playbook for the general population. 5/15.
2
2
50
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
So in the short-term, people should not be on the lookout for a big policy announcement that will suddenly move things away from zero-Covid, but rather a major propaganda campaign to layout the groundwork for a policy change months later. 4/15.
2
6
77
@andrewpolk81
andrew polk
3 years
More importantly, because party leadership has tied itself so closely to the zero-Covid policy, there will have to be a months-long messaging campaign to prep the country for a shift in approach. There will be no sudden announcement that China is now “living with the virus.”3/15.
4
7
98