Martin
@MartinLXYoung
Followers
99
Following
539
Media
69
Statuses
645
Theatre academic and lighting designer. Performance and Political Economy Research Collective he/him
Joined April 2021
New article published in TDR on labour, digital memory, and stage lighting. https://t.co/4CiqDRHCsX
2
2
12
I just googled a critical term to check I'm using it right and the AI Overview gave me a summary scraped directly from something I myself published years ago. Loathsome experience.
0
0
4
The first outing of the Commercial Performance project! Exciting!
Very excited to be hosting the following @TaPRA_ interim event prior to #TaPRA2024 – a brilliant panel discussion on commercial live performance! When? 27 Aug, 5-6.30pm UK time Where? On Zoom Who? All welcome! Register free here:
0
3
6
'It is worthwhile to question what the picket intends to achieve and how that something is (purportedly) achieved – to question whether the picket is mere spectacle, an antidote to spectacle, or something in between ...'
0
0
1
I enjoyed @sebjectivisms's new article on the performative qualities (and political utility) of picket lines.
2
0
2
Why do historians have this weird tic of talking about the past in the present tense? I just listened to someone on a podcast say "the City of London is the most heavily policed part of Great Britain" and took a beat to twig that he was referring to the 1750s.
0
0
0
really good honest reporting coming from the nyt this morning
68
1K
44K
Hate to admit it but the category of people making the most positive contributions to public discourse this election cycle is blokes who played Hamlet.
0
0
5
"Thank you to my dresser, you dressed me on Equus... Oh no, you DIDN'T dress me on Equus!"
Daniel Radcliffe wins and his Merrily We Roll Along co-star Jonathan Groff is overwhelmed with emotion 🥹🥲 #TonyAwards
0
0
3
The perfect prompt to go and read my boy @whatartmad's article "Volunteer Labor and Theatrical Community in Emma Rice's A Midsummer Night's Dream" in @ShaxBull!
Happy #VolunteersWeek ❤️ We want to say thank you to our 750 Volunteers and 30 Access Ambassadors, who support us and our visitors here! ⭕ Meet some of the team and find out more: https://t.co/Ezq4Qcafq6
0
3
4
My class interest is: I want my own water bills to go up so that the private utilities company my pension is invested in remains profitable.
1
0
0
The emotional experience of being in this union veers wildly from the righteous anger of the picket to the petty indignation of a shareholder.
1
0
2
The thing about headlines like this is that they threaten that everything's about to fall apart when it's already happened. Universities effectively *have* ground to a halt. We have surpassed some of the "alarmist" forecasts of collapse made in years gone by.
Both staff and students will feel the disastrous impact of these cuts 👇 “Staff will be so stretched that parts of university education that students really value will have to be removed” https://t.co/g31sjQd1DO
0
0
0
The “Cass Review” has been called out for employing unscientific methodologies, the massaging of data, unsubstantiated claims & failure to engage ethically with trans children or adults. Please sign [You can be academically qualified & not in academia to do so, too].
Calling all academics, join over 100 of your peers. Unsound methodology, unacceptable bias, problematic and unsupported conclusions. As academics we regard The Cass Review as dangerous and potentially harmful to trans children Sign our open letter today. https://t.co/trr6xgD8hP
3
24
67
I have spent much of my academic life rolling my eyes at the pseudo intellectualism of fashionable theory but this seems both quite straightforward and potentially useful?
0
0
0
I've seen various right wing academics arching their eyebrows at this as being self-evidently absurd and I've got to say, I really feel like those claiming it makes no sense are just advertising their own inability to understand things.
Everyone's getting mad at this but honestly besides the (sadly common, alas) somewhat pretentious use of "methodology" I don't see why it's so bad.
1
0
0