virtuallylaw Profile Banner
Patrick Murck Profile
Patrick Murck

@virtuallylaw

Followers
12K
Following
7K
Media
55
Statuses
6K

Founder & CEO @surus_io | blockchain nihilist - law maximilist

Seattle :: DC :: Cambridge
Joined March 2010
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@virtuallylaw
Patrick Murck
9 months
Back in the arena
@Surus_io
Surus
9 months
The future of finance is onchain. Our regulated, institutional-grade platform equips builders with everything they need to create, sell, and manage tokenized assets, from fiduciary asset management services to custody for traditional and crypto native assets, brokerage and
1
4
23
@Surus_io
Surus
20 hours
👀@virtuallylaw at the @philadelphiafed Fintech Conference yesterday discussing PoW vs PoS economics alongside @kwerb (Wharton), @AKirilenko_True (University of Cambridge) and @JagtianiJulapa (FRB of Philadelphia)
0
1
5
@Surus_io
Surus
17 hours
Our Founder, @virtuallylaw, and our Product Lead, @twhirty_ , land in Buenos Aires today 🇦🇷! First stop: LabWeek - a decentralized conference hosted by our client, @protocollabs. Then DevConnect @EFDevcon . @Surus_io provides custody and tokenization infrastructure for builders
0
1
3
@ArthurB
Arthur B.
4 days
Censorship resistance, resiliency, and trust minimization are the purposes of crypto. Decentralization is the worst technique to achieve that, except for all others.
@punk6529
6529
5 days
decentralization is the only purpose of crypto
6
9
55
@Surus_io
Surus
5 days
🚨This month's Policy Roundtable episode just dropped! @virtuallylaw + @xethalis (General Counsel, Multicoin Capital) and @KarenUbell (Partner, Goodwin) discuss Key Policy Developments: 🎯Mike Selig nominated to chair CFTC 📜Binance leaked listing terms 🏁SEC recognizes state
0
2
5
@lopp
Jameson Lopp
7 days
The "bad actors" aren't the folks openly using Bitcoin in ways you dislike. The "bad actors" are the ones wasting months rehashing the same fruitless arguments, holding secret meetings about consensus changes, using fear of lawfare to coerce compliance with their desires.
49
28
245
@csuwildcat
Daniel Ƀrrr
8 days
Got kicked out of BIP444Forker Telegram for asking: "Assume we stripped Bitcoin of nearly all OP codes, leaving only basic send/recieve with public keys and hashes. Spam would still be easy to embed, while Bitcoin would be hobbled, so what's the measure for net success/failure?"
40
31
217
@adam3us
Adam Back
10 days
i consider myself a bitcoin maximalist. but not a reactive ignorant one, so i'm not identifying with some of this agro nonsense. focus on bitcoin long-term prospects, defending bitcoin for future generations. and live and let live, we don't have to agree about subjective topics.
157
138
2K
@RepThomasMassie
Thomas Massie
14 days
The fact @SpeakerJohnson is doing everything possible to keep the names in those files from coming out tells you how rich and powerful the implicated men are. https://t.co/L9qT0Y9hPF
1K
7K
24K
@RepThomasMassie
Thomas Massie
16 days
When leaders of my own party protect sex traffickers, spend our grandkids into oblivion, fund endless wars, lockdown our citizens, bailout corporations, bow to other countries, and hurt small farmers… …it’s true that I won’t be their yes man.
4K
12K
71K
@MrHodl
MrHodl🟠🤌👍⚡️
17 days
Them: Bitcoin is not a database! Hal: It's a decentralized database!
71
64
409
@austinhill
Austin Hill
17 days
Reminder. The Four Horsemen of the Infocalypse was an attack by your government that almost succeeded in outlawing your access to crypto. We fought that war so future generations would have crypto freedom and monetary freedom. Sad to see the techniques of the state to
2
10
21
@notgrubles
grubles
17 days
I'm not even sure BSV was this stupid, and that is saying a lot.
@TheBlueMatt
Matt Corallo 🟠
17 days
This is absolutely unhinged. A Bitcoin where your funds are randomly seized by a few devs deciding you did something that happens to use a feature also used by something they don't like is not even remotely Bitcoin.
9
9
120
@lopp
Jameson Lopp
17 days
We have completed upgrading @CasaHODL's fleet of nodes to Bitcoin Core 30.0. Anyone who wishes to send us legal threats may direct them to the following address:
58
17
313
@austinhill
Austin Hill
18 days
Discussing threats in an adversarial network that requires threat modelling, or even doing things others disagree but is allowed by the protocol does not make you a bad actor. @lopp @peterktodd aren’t bad actors. They are discussing facts about open networks and what is and
@FieldNas
Hammond of Texas🌽
18 days
When someone tells you who they are, believe them.
8
12
49
@Surus_io
Surus
19 days
"As finance moves onchain, the market needs digitally native infrastructure that is flexible enough to support tokenized assets of all kinds within bankruptcy-remote structures." - @virtuallylaw 🔗 Learn more about how Surus is building for the onchain economy:
0
4
9
@PakoVM
PakoVM
20 days
The same people telling me for years the Covenants are rushed, now want to rush a soft-fork due to... And hear me out clearly here... LEGAL REASONS! 🤣
9
6
89
@notgrubles
grubles
21 days
If you actually used Bitcoin as money and cared about people using Bitcoin as money, you would understand that arbitrary data onchain has little effect on your ability to send payments through Lightning. But the filterors are just deploying smoke and mirrors, acting as if they
43
7
97
@PakoVM
PakoVM
22 days
People you disagree with being able to use Bitcoin in ways you disapprove of is a feature not a bug. You know what? It's not just a feature, it's the whole reason for the system to exist.
14
6
52
@Surus_io
Surus
22 days
Our Founder & CEO @virtuallylaw is heading to @money2020. If you are exploring stablecoin issuance, tokenizing RWAs or adding digital assets to your treasury holdings, let's talk. Learn more at https://t.co/ymdqGArl8s
0
2
2
@notgrubles
grubles
23 days
It's not about CSAM. It was always about control. The filterors are no different than the big blockers.
60
7
127