Call me crazy but today Xi Jinping did not sound like someone that wants to avoid war at all costs. He reiterated his 'unshakeable commitment to unification with Taiwan and warned foreigners that 'bully' China will be met with 'great wall of steel.'
Chinese State Council issued a report last week on human rights violations in the US. They don't seem to understand the irony that all their cited information comes from the US - gov reports and the free press!
General Wei tells us not to worry. China is peace loving. China has never attacked another country in its history. Tell that to Vietnam, India and South Korea!
#SLD19
"The Chinese government is engaged in the most sustained, scaled and sophisticated theft of intellectual property and expertise in human history"
Five Eyes spy chiefs warn Silicon Valley of Chinese threat from quantum computing and AI to synthetic biology:
I’ve always thought of Xi as ruthless but pragmatic. Hu was not a threat - he no longer had his own power base. This makes me think Xi has indeed lost it.
Hu Jintao, the former Chinese leader, was unexpectedly escorted out of the Communist Party congress without explanation. He appeared to pause to speak to President Xi Jinping before leaving.
We are excited to announce that China and East Asian security expert Oriana Skylar Mastro
@osmastro
will join us as a Center Fellow beginning this August!
Welcome
@osmastro
! The CISAC community is happy to welcome such a highly regarded scholar who focuses on Chinese military and security policy, Asia-Pacific security issues, great power relations, war termination, and coercive diplomacy.
You think we've rebalanced? Shocking stat I read in a report today: the U.S. Air Force has the same number of Foreign Area Officer billets for Chinese specialists as it does for Portuguese speakers.
Anyone who says China would never attack Guam has never engaged w/ PRC military or read authoritative writings. Nothing is off the table. Although exact targets depend on what US needs most to operate.
@TBowmanNPR
In September, NATO members hosted their first dedicated session on the Chinese threat to Taiwan - from
@dimi
and
@HenryJFoy
@FT
. Positive news for the US efforts to get NATO allies on-side in a potential Taiwan conflict.
As I've argued before, the US cannot deter a Chinese invasion of Taiwan alone -- we need the full support of our allies, especially Japan. Check out my piece in
@washingtonpost
to see how Tokyo could contribute to a defense of Taiwan.
Writing for
@TheEconomist
, I argue that the danger of China's recent military exercises near Taiwan stems from creating a new normal. If greater Chinese activity around Taiwan becomes normalized, a real invasion will be harder to spot.
American companies engaged in artificial intelligence, quantum computing, biotechnology, semiconductors, and autonomous systems have to be more cautious when doing business with China.
@Dimi
@FinancialTimes
These rumors of a coup in China are insane. If anything did happen, the military would be at the center of it. That’s also why it’s so unbelievable - Xi has worked hard to control the military through appointing loyalists and getting rid of dissenters.
I'll be arguing that within the next five years, China will use significant military force against a country on its periphery -
@fravel
will take the opposing position. Should be interesting!
“Beijing has concluded that the Quad represents one of the most consequential challenges to Chinese ambitions in the years ahead,” writes
@MrKRudd
@ForeignAffairs
:
Chinese military leaders believe that they will have the capabilities to force unification with Taiwan within a year—we need to act now.
@WSJ
,
@AlastairGale
Security tensions between China and the United States are likely to rise, especially with respect to Taiwan and the South China Sea. My predictions in the Economist’s In the World 2020:
State Dept has released new document on the China challenge: . Is anyone else a bit tired of the constant restating of the problem without any real movement towards doing something about it?
I argue in a new piece in
@Journal_IS
that China is likely to intervene militarily in a Korea contingency and given their capabilities to deal with nuclear weapons, this could be a good thing.
The fall issue of International Security is now online: . Read articles by Michael Beckley; Asfandyar Mir (
@asfandyarmir
); Oriana Skylar Mastro; (
@osmastro
); Matthew Adam Kocher, Adria K. Lawrence (
@ALintheMagreb
), and Nuno P. Monteiro; and Reid B.C. Pauly.
A big congratulations to
@FSIStanford
's incoming Center Fellow
@osmastro
for her award-winning article, "The Stealth Superpower: How China Hid Its Global Ambitions," which won the 2020
#AWC
Article Prize for "Best Policy Article on U.S Foreign Policy and Grand Strategy!"
My critics are right - Xi talks about peaceful reunification more often and directly than allusions to armed reunification. But if your spouse tells you often they love you, and only mentions a handful of times that they want a divorce, are you reassured?
@osmastro
@ForeignAffairs
Thanks to all the authors for an excellent discussion of the issue. I still disagree with
@osmastro
's claim that Xi "has made numerous statements that suggest he wants to achieve unification during his reign." Xi has been deliberately ambiguous.
China's military modernization & assertive actions have led to riskier encounters between the PLA & militaries of Indo-Pacific nations. Read the new
@NBRnews
report I edited, which examines PLA incidents with six nations and the potential for conflict:
I seriously doubt it. China/Russia arent even at the stage of having embeds/liaisons within each other's organizations. US doesn't even do joint contingency planning with many of its allies! It's just two difficult countries being difficult.
I realize I’m late to the party, but
@SheenaGreitens
report on Chinese global surveillance is a must read. Perfect example of rigorous scholarship with real world impact.
'Mulan' is a movie about what Hollywood will do to stay in China (like ignoring
#HongKongProtests
& Xinjiang human rights abuses) now that the US box office is a COVID-era debacle. My newest in
@washingtonpost
with many thanks to editor
@sophiah_n
Delighted to welcome China and East Asian security expert
@osmastro
as
@FSIStanford
Center Fellow at APARC, starting Aug 1. In our Q&A, we talk w/ Oriana about Chinese aims, worsening U.S.-China relations, her military career and research, and more. Read:
Thrilled to announced that I’ve been named individual reservist of the year (FGO)- a huge shout out to
@INDOPACOM
@FSIStanford
@AEIfdp
for all their support!
Speaking to
@FareedZakaria
on
@CNN
, I analyzed the differences between China's most recent exercises and those that triggered the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis more than 25 years ago. The Chinese military now is clearly much more capable and much closer to being able to take Taiwan.
The Quad is becoming more strategically important. . 69% percent of ASEAN policy elites believe the Quad should “play a role in enforcing rules-based order”, like ensuring freedom of navigation against Chinese maritime claims.
If you were thinking 'you know, I haven't heard enough about Taiwan from Oriana,' you are in luck! My response to critics is out in the new issue of
@ForeignAffairs
:
I argued
@HouseForeign
() that China wants to control the South China Sea but Only wants to be one of many operating in the rest of the world’s oceans. Failing to understand this distinction can lead to bad strategies and poor prioritization.
Chinese investment in the Maldives is a frequent subject of concern. But the available data suggests that fears of military access are overblown, and that Chinese development projects, such as the resort on Feydhoo Finolhu, are no more than they appear:
I will be heading to China to attend the 10th Beijing Xiangshan Forum, where I will speak on the rapid advancements in AI technology, the unforeseeable security challenges they entail, and strategies for their mitigation and management.
Writing in
@ForeignAffairs
,
@ElbridgeColby
argues that the US must do more to prepare for war over Taiwan. In the
@nytimes
, I also argued that words in support of Taiwan is dangerous without the military capabilities to protect it.
The conventional wisdom on China and North Korea is dangerously out of date. I argue
@ForeignAffairs
(Jan/Feb issue) that if conflict breaks on the peninsula, China is likely to intervene extensively and militarily.
Unfortunately I don’t think there’s much we can do to change China’s approach to Hong Kong, but we can make it costly. Sanctions are a good first step. .
Looks like US-India defense cooperation has gotten attention in Beijing. A fellow at influential Chinese think tank CICIR calls the relationship a de facto alliance: .
Great piece on China’s failed attempt to bully Australia. After seven years of marriage to an Australian, I could’ve told Beijing this wasn’t going to go well…
@MichaelSchuman
@TheAtlantic
“The goal should be to weave Taiwan more deeply into the community of nations and to ensure that more countries have a greater interest in Taiwan’s ultimate fate, thereby making Chinese decision-making vis-à-vis Taiwan more complicated,”
@mike_mazza
:
Couldn’t agree more w/ NSA Jake Sullivan: US “should put less focus on trying to slow China down and more emphasis on trying to run faster ourselves,”
@michaelcrowley
,
@SangerNYT
,
@nytimes
My latest with Bonnie Glaser - not only did Beijing get everything it wanted out of the summit, it leveraged its relationship with North Korea to ensure that outcome. The repercussions go far beyond the Korean peninsula to our great power competition with China.
In 2020, China stepped up military maneuvers near Taiwan. Its goal? Make these types of operations routine so that everyone just accepts this increased presence, I argue in
@WSJ
.
My latest article in
@SecStudies_Jrnl
, where I contend that China & Russia are deeply aligned and moving toward an even closer relationship. However, their military cooperation primarily aims to support China's challenge of US hegemony in Asia.
Read here:
On a new
#WorldClassPodcast
episode:
@osmastro
discusses the tension between China and Taiwan and why it matters for the U.S. and the world. She also predicts for how relations between Washington and Beijing will look during the Biden administration ⬇️
We need to stop this narrative that Biden’s domestic focus means that “there may not be bandwidth” to compete with China:
The greatest nation in the world can walk and chew gum at the same time.
The US needs based overseas to remain a Pacific power - China doesn’t. The narrative in the US too often forgets we didn’t establish alliances out of altruism, but as a strategic necessity. We need Australia just as much as they need us.
We are seeing a flurry of punitive measures, and strident speeches, against the CCP from the Trump administration. A tougher approach to China is overdue. But as we wrote this week, I think the recent moves add up to an attitude more than a strategy
“Under Xi Jinping there has been a shift in mentality away from just preventing [
#Taiwan
] independence towards promoting progress towards reunification,” said
@osmastro
“He has given the impression that this is going to be part of his legacy.”
This is a must read: . But takeaway is NOT that the US wins. It says 1)if Taiwan resists successfully 2)US intervenes en mass 3) and quickly 4) Japan fights with us, we win.Problem: currently none of these conditions are true.
Tensions are high between the US and China. According to
@SusanVLawrence
@CRS4Congress
, since 1995, China has never issued more than two consecutive Foreign Ministry statements related to a single country. China has now issued five in a row about the US:
On
@BBCWorld
with
@SallyBundockBBC
, I predicted that China would take the current situation as an opportunity to test out their military capabilities but do nothing to threaten Speaker Pelosi's safety while she is in Taiwan.
The State Department approved the sale of ammunition and logistics support to Taiwan in two separate deals valued at up to $440 million.
It may not be flashy, but this sort of US support helps build up Taiwan’s resilience in a shooting war.
On Sunday, I spoke to
@FareedZakaria
on
@CNN
's GPS about Beijing's live fire exercises in response to Speaker Pelosi's visit. These exercises are not just a show of force, but have likely helped China test out their various capabilities en route to taking Taiwan.
My 2017 essay on China as a strategic revisionist. The last of the six sections still captures some key challenges I see for the next administration, no matter who wins the election next week. To compete with China, America needs to actually compete:
While I respect both the authors this is just outdated analysis. US could’ve easily defended Taiwan 20 years ago. But no longer. Or perhaps they know something the Pentagon or the PLA doesn’t?
I just don't know. Which is worse, having a president that threatens our democratic institutions, or the fact that so many Americans voted for him. Again. It's hard to keep the faith.
“Once China moves in, it doesn't leave. It might decrease the numbers. It might play nice for a little while. Maybe it ratchets down the tension for short-term political gain. But it is unlikely to vacate this reef,”
@GregPoling
on PRC aggression toward PH:
My latest comments in
@dwertime
’s
@politico
China Watcher: “China is not trying to build a socialist...order. China is richer... more pragmatic and a more attractive partner than the Soviet Union ever was. We ignore these differences at our peril.”
Best lunch this week, listening to
@osmastro
on
#SouthChinaSea
- thanks for your insight and expertise, and coming all the way from 🇺🇲 , with toddler and baby to share with us. Looking forward to
@CWPColumbia
next week
@anu_china
Important reminder to keep our eye on Chinese use of economic tools to expand power. But how effective are they? I was in Djibouti yesterday- and all I heard was resentment about the big loans they have to repay for a railroad that doesn’t work and doesn’t even go to the ports!
“The Chinese are devoting billions of dollars not to just transportation infra but also to acquiring port facilities…there’s an integration here.” -David Lampton
@SAISHopkins
“The primary cause of inequality in China is entrenched privileges for state-owned enterprises and the well-connected at the expense of the truly private economy.” What does the Evergrande crisis imply?
@WSJ
:
US and its allies need to make such tactics costly for China. We need to revitalize alliances so they protect against all forms of coercion, not just military invasions.
China steps up pressure on Australia, ordering traders to stop purchasing at least seven categories of Australian commodities. Intended to warn other countries of the consequences of challenging Chinese interests.
“The question that keeps me up at night is, what happens when our diplomats no longer have the might of the U.S. military or our economy as their backstop?” Chief of Staff Gen. Charles “CQ” Brown said Aug. 6.
Compared to Taiwan, China has six times the warships, six times the warplanes and eight times the tanks. China’s defence budget, merely double Taiwan’s at the end of the 1990s, is now 25 times greater.
It’s true that Hong Kong’s autonomy is gravely at risk, but it’s hard to see how demoting our trade relationship won’t hurt the very people we would like to help.
We can forgo a year or two of joint military exercises before there is an impact on readiness. But the US willingness to negotiate on these points undermines the narrative that the US role is necessary for regional peace and security. China must be ecstatic.
“China seeks to build a conventional force capable of establishing temporary military superiority over the United States in a specific geographic area and for a period of time sufficient to achieve its military and political objectives, ”
Official U.S. Taiwan policy is to prevent unification by force, not to prevent it by any means. If we are going to prevent a war, we need to get this right along with a strong military deterrent. For more, see my piece in today's
@nytimes
:
My main concern is US conventional deterrence is eroding. My comment about Vietnam was to highlight that there is little sense of urgency about changing these trends. If there were, we would be more innovative to maintain mil advantage.