lukaswallrich Profile Banner
Lukas Wallrich Profile
Lukas Wallrich

@lukaswallrich

Followers
178
Following
1K
Media
12
Statuses
419

Lecturer in Organisational Psychology @Birkbeck. Passionate about diversity, social justice and open science. 🐘 @[email protected]

London
Joined February 2011
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@ryancbriggs
Ryan Briggs
17 days
I've noticed when submitting peer reviews that some journals now have a box you have to check that pledges that you didn't use AI when doing the review. This seems dumb to me. I do use AI when I do peer reviews. I do the following: 1. Write my review as I always have, 2. Upload
31
10
307
@ryancbriggs
Ryan Briggs
1 month
A student recently asked me for academic job market advice and I pulled up a slideshow from a few years ago. I don't think I've shared it, but it might be broadly useful. I think the advice almost entirely holds up. First part is about my time on the job market 1/3
2
64
646
@emollick
Ethan Mollick
2 months
I am very sympathetic to the delays in publishing papers, but I think we need to be careful with "AI can't do this" claims when our empirical evidence pre-dates even o1 class Reasoners. The strongest model here is GPT-4 (which does better) and the next best is Llama 2 70B(!!)...
@rohanpaul_ai
Rohan Paul
2 months
This paper shows LLM legal interpretations are unstable and often unlike what ordinary people think. Shows LLMs can look confident while missing how non-experts read legal language. The authors test many models on insurance scenarios using simple yes or no questions. Small
25
28
375
@JoachimSchork
Joachim Schork
2 months
Give your visualizations a modern and polished look! The hrbrthemes package offers sleek, minimalist themes for ggplot2 plots, designed to enhance readability and visual appeal, especially in reports and presentations. ✔️ Modern, Clean Aesthetic: Apply contemporary themes that
0
10
72
@lakens
Daniël Lakens
2 months
Exciting new addition to the AsPredicted and ResearchBox research infrastructure toolbox: AsCollected https://t.co/I0zJe5DAMU A platform to document results provenance - where did data come from, who collected it, and who cleaned and analyzed it. So important!
0
7
14
@sharmaG30
Gaurav Sharma, Ph.D.
2 months
🧵Poll Thread (1-7) on first/corresponding authorship in science. Try to answer all poll questions. Retweet 🔁for broader reach. Disclaimer: this post and even GScholarLens (as of now) are only for those fields where authorship positions matter. After GScholarLens's Nature
3
5
5
@emollick
Ethan Mollick
2 months
For all its flaws, Wikipedia is the crowning achievement of the human web An AI-assisted fork of Wikipedia could be interesting, but only if it embraced transparency, had access to scholarly work & if the AI was used to help humans in making information better, not override them
@emollick
Ethan Mollick
3 years
At the center of everything is Wikipedia. 🔎Wikipedia articles appear in 67%-84% of all search engine results & most info boxes 🔎Wikipedia generates 43M clicks to external websites a month 🔎Wikipedia is a major component of AI training data, including The Pile training set
52
43
500
@ozriclentils
ozriclentils 🇨🇦
2 months
@NTFabiano This template letter is extremely useful in such an eventuality.
1
6
51
@lakens
Daniël Lakens
2 months
Now Max Primbs talking about his super exciting Many-Dags project, asking experts in his field of implicit researchers to draw DAGs about a theory in his field.
0
1
12
@nagyt
Tamás Nagy
6 months
New study alert! We're excited to share our "Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology" in #AMPPS. We tackle the credibility crisis in research by defining, collecting, and categorizing QRPs using a community consensus method. 🧵#OpenScience #QRPs
1
5
4
@minilek
Jelani Nelson
7 months
Yonas Bekele is a public high school student in Ethiopia, admitted to the United World Colleges with a 90% scholarship. But the 10% left (+ registration deposit) comes out to roughly 85k RMB (roughly $12k USD). Yonas is a total stranger who emailed me, and I usually ignore such
3
57
253
@MatthewBJane
Matthew B. Jané
7 months
Happy Friday everyone! I just posted what I think is an important blog post on my website. It is a critique of meta-meta-analyses: meta-analyses of meta-analyses.
10
33
119
@paulnovosad
Paul Novosad
8 months
Every econ referee report should include two scores out of 100: (1) Accuracy; (2) Importance. These scores should be public and should follow the papers. This would have all kinds of benefits: 1. It would reduce the incentive to submit to all 5 top five journals 🧵 1/n
15
14
226
@lakens
Daniël Lakens
9 months
Joined in on the first qualitative interview @sajedeh_rasti is doing for her PhD, interviewing scientists involved in large scale coordinated projects. Incredibly interesting. Qualitative research and talking to scientists in other disciplines is providing a wealth of information
1
3
18
@sanchoyai
Sanchoy Hossain
10 months
6. Light blue is a map as we know it and dark blue is the actual size of each country
3
5
68
@lukaswallrich
Lukas Wallrich
11 months
Interested in #IntergroupContact research? If so, check out our newsletter (4x per year, so might just about fit into a busy inbox :)
0
0
0
@ryancbriggs
Ryan Briggs
11 months
It’s not even obvious that anyone wanted to cut PEPFAR. It’s just that “cut all aid” sounded good to a certain type. But @marcorubio can fix this. I don’t know enough about American politics to know where leverage is here, but so much is at stake in keeping PEPFAR funds flowing.
@peterwildeford
Peter Wildeford🇺🇸🚀
11 months
PEPFAR's funding was recently paused, despite being an amazingly cost-effective aid program. However, Marco Rubio can issue a waiver to get PEPFAR back up immediately, like he has already done for some forms of emergency food aid. Potentially worth encouraging this action.
3
12
186
@skominers
Scott Kominers
11 months
Utterly astounding to me that it's possible to publish a paper in PNAS that shows a correlation between having a "hit paper" as a postdoc and later academic success -- and then interprets this as a signal about the impact of quality postdoc experience without even nodding to the
@maxplanckpress
Max Planck Society
11 months
More than 40 percent of #postdocs leave academia. Those who landed a coveted faculty position were more likely to have had a highly cited paper, changed their research topic between their #PhD and postdoc, or moved abroad after receiving their doctorate.
8
27
329
@lakens
Daniël Lakens
1 year
The Journal of Consumer Research announces Registered Reports and Brief Commentaries. https://t.co/wxRaCrnA7q Both formats can play an important role in a much needed increase in the quality of scientific research at this journal.
Tweet card summary image
consumerresearcher.com
Update: We will hold two Zoom sessions to discuss these publication options, on Tuesday, March 11th, at 11AM EST and
2
7
23
@KwekuOA
Kweku Opoku-Agyemang, Ph.D
1 year
@daniel_dsj2110 Students complaining about something or other is not the big deal people make it out to be. I sometimes worry that some people bend over backwards to avoid hearing a student complain about something. Complaining is actually an important part of democratic culture. It's not bad in
0
1
22