I'm increasingly interested in the idea of "personal moats" in the context of careers.
Moats should be:
- Hard to learn and hard to do (but perhaps easier for you)
- Skills that are rare and valuable
- Legible
- Compounding over time
- Unique to your own talents & interests
1/ In the literature of growth & marketing, there is this concept called “loops”
I’m curious to explore “loops” in the context of how people make career decisions and think about how to build career capital over time.
I’ve been into the idea of *legibility* recently as it relates to conveying expertise/skills at scale.
The basic idea is that it’s not enough to be good at something, you also want your expertise to be easy to describe, easy to share, and makes people want to do both.
@eriktorenberg
.Truly unique in this theory would be degree of truth from which a personal moat is created (where truth is scarce),
force multiplied by one’s runway length where one can measure a return on their ‘truth moat’ by degree of control of choice,
& ability to leave $ on the table.
@eriktorenberg
"The test of whether a moat exists is quantitative, even though the factors that create moats are qualitative. If "X" has not earned returns on capital substantially exceeding the opportunity cost of capital for 3 to 5 years, it does not have a moat."
@eriktorenberg
Very hard to consciously create one. Genetics and unusual experiences/circumstances can occasionally create moats as a side effect. Becoming an extreme expert at something intentionally has significant costs