Sports prove over and over again that upper middle class and even rich Americans will willingly ride transit when it's the most convenient way to get around.
The way some young dudes destroy their lives to buy toy trucks is truly heartbreaking.
In an update we find out the dude is paying $1,966 for 72 months (at 14%) for this $95 THOUSAND truck.
Would have been better off getting hooked on sports betting!
I know a lot of fellow progressives don't want to hear this, but if we want more middle class families to ride transit we're going to have to address anti-social behavior on trains and buses.
I'm sure the loss of a single story commercial building was devastating for the community (don't worry, they're building a replacement Chase bank branch) but I think it's actually great that 6 very low income households will get to live in downtown Berkeley now.
*Me on a first date*
My brain:
Don't say it
Don't say it
Don't say it
Don't say it
Don't say it
Don't say it
Don't say it
Don't say it
Don't say it
Don't say it
“Upzoning to allow denser development in our cities is crucial to addressing inequality & climate change.”
Mixed use buildings with a shop on the first floor and housing above is how we built our cities for centuries, and it should be broadly legalized today.
It's weird how urban universities have these lovely pedestrian walkways that everyone enjoys strolling down...but then American cities refuse to consider building anything like this off campus?
A lot of folks are invested in not identifying actual first couple signs of gentrification because then they'd have to admit they're 1st or 2nd wave gentrifiers
They pretend stuff that comes at the end of the process (or even afterwards) is gentrification, and remain guilt-free
Imagine spending $80,000 on a giant truck to let everyone know you're really masculine, and then it turns out Humphrey Bogart looks infinitely cooler on a bicycle.
I don't think most people realize how "urban" and walkable smaller cities and towns were back in the day.
Johnstown PA is a small city (53k in 1960) 56 miles from Pittsburgh, but it's Main Street had more going on in 1959 than you see in many larger cities today.
Why is transit ridership so much higher in NYC than the rest of the country?
The relative lack of parking is important, but "it's the fastest way to get around" shouldn't be under-appreciated!
Taking away the driver's license (and vehicles) of someone who's proven to be an unsafe driver is often framed as an overly devastating punishment that will force big lifestyle changes, but that pales in comparison to the effects of injuries and deaths caused by these car crashes
If we could put up buildings like this in our cities in the 1920s, there's no reason why we shouldn't be able to do it again in the 2020s.
Andersonville, Chicago
I never really got this cover because it makes perfect sense to me that some folks would prefer to pedal in the comfort of a gym when cycling in an American city with little actual bike infrastructure is often uncomfortable and frankly scary.
It's soon going to be cheaper to take a train from Philadelphia to Manhattan than to drive into NYC's central business district, and I think that's cool as hell.
I'm hoping "gentrification is when white people use their laptop on the train" is the point where we collectively accept it's time to move beyond gentrification discourse and pivot to focusing on what actually matters: displacement.
People pretending they're fine with anti-social behavior on transit systems to earn city-living authenticity points is a take I hope we leave behind in 2022.
San Francisco is funny cause people will argue it's impossible to add any more housing, then you see a photo of the city and except for one little corner the buildings are all short as hell.
Tech capital of the world and they have a collective phobia of elevators...
Absolutely insane how NYC could instantly improve the visiting experience at this popular tourist spot at the expense of about a dozen parking spots...and just doesn't.
We need to bring back cheap residential hotels like this YMCA in Chicago where newcomers to a city can find an affordable housing option as they build a new life.
Even if that means allowing a building that towers over adjacent low-rises.
Re-branding "food courts" as "food halls" has got to be one of the greatest marketing pivots of all time, no?
People who would never eat in a mall food court flock to every new food hall that pops up in trendy neighborhoods.
Humans have been building stadiums well integrated in to the larger urban built environment FOR MILLENNIUMS and Americans really said, "Screw that, we're just going to build an entire neighborhood of parking lots".
Too many American urban parks are just giant turf fields euphemistically referred to as "green space".
Parks should be visually interesting enough to compel walking through day after day, season after season, year after year.
In other words, American parks need more obelisks.
When you look at photos of US cities from pre-automobile era it's easy to see why car companies had to invent crime of "jaywalking".
At the time of this photo, 1907, claiming pedestrians should only cross the street at intersections, at certain times, would've seemed absurd.
I think
@Joe_Cortright
does a good job in this
@CityObs
piece explaining how "much of what is labeled pedestrian infrastructure is in reality car infrastructure" but sometimes a picture really is worth a thousand words.
Instead of perpetuating environmental racism by forcing apartment dwellers to live on large arterials roads with horrific air quality from car and truck traffic, cities should emulate Chicago, where many quiet streets include numerous small apartment buildings.
YIMBYism seems extreme because most don't realize how radical last century of land-use planning has been.
We rejected millennia of knowledge about how our built environments should be laid to accommodate driving, and now slightly rolling back those changes seems revolutionary.
As someone who has lived in DC, Boston, and Philadelphia (and will soon be moving to NYC) I appreciate the strengths of all those cities, but it's the ability to travel between those cities (for professional or amenity reasons) with ease that makes the Northeast the best region.
As urbanists we have to do a better job explaining environmental benefits of replacing a single family house and some grass with 10 apartments in walkable neighborhoods served by transit, because apparently the improvement isn't intuitive for many people
Bed-Stuy, NYC
2017➡️2020
Pennsylvania's smaller cities like Allentown are a good reminder that it's possible to achieve impressive density with pedestrian-scaled streets outside of large metros.
When you compare these two neighboring blocks of rowhomes on the same street in Philadelphia, it really highlights how much driveways and garages doors degrade the pedestrian experience.
One's a block for people, and one's a block for cars.
ADUs and duplexes get a lot of attention, but small apartment buildings like this 6 unit building in Boston is the Missing Middle housing typology we need if we're really going to address our housing shortage crisis.
"Some people shouldn't be trusted with driver's licenses or cars" is one of those things that's just absolutely true, but people want to deny because the social implications are too big.
Young folks who grew up in the suburbs moving into an existing home in a walkable city near transit is fine, regardless of the demographics of the neighborhood.
Can you believe we used to have streetcars run down our Main Streets with their own right of way, surrounded by grass and trees?
We can have this again, if we have the political will.
Can you guess which American city this is, circa 1903?
What happened in Brooklyn was unquestionably a tragedy, but odd to see people use it to argue riding transit is dangerous:
~100 Americans will die in automobile crashes today. And tomorrow. And the day after that.
Getting in a car is probably most dangerous thing you did today.
Listened to Chapo review of
@mattyglesias
's book, and folks, it isn't good. In order to go after Matt, they make anti-natalist, pro-sprawl, immigration-skeptical arguments that come off as pretty reactionary.
"Things can't get better!" isn't socialist message I'm interested in.
If we can't figure out how to build an elevated rail or a subway in the median of this absurdly wide boulevard we might as well admit we're done building new heavy rail transit infrastructure in American cities.
Suburban drivers: "I would love to not have to drive in to the city, but the commuter trains don't run frequently enough."
Transit advocates: "Let's implement congestion pricing and use the revenue to run more trains."
Suburban drivers:
People freak out about the idea of having multifamily residential buildings next to single family houses, and then you see it in the real world and it's just absolutely fine.
3626 & 3622 West Mc Lean Avenue
Chicago
"How do we get most households down to one car" is such a more interesting, useful, and productive question than "how do we get more households to go carless".
Chicago has *SO* many small and medium sized multi-family residential buildings on quiet residential streets, and the idea apartment buildings like this would degrade a neighborhood's charm is self-evidently absurd.
Very amusing to me that Philadelphia, a city whose global importance peaked several lifetimes ago, has a taller skyscraper than the tallest building in the Bay Area, the nominal modern innovation capital of the world.
I know I'm not exactly tall, but I don't see why a motor vehicle this towering should be street legal in a city.
At the very least driving it ought to require a commercial driver's license.
Looking at Philadelphia traffic at 7AM it's clear the closure of I-95 is having highly localized effects, but hardly impacting congestion on regional level.
Is this a problem that actually requires immediately throwing unlimited amounts of money at without asking questions?