Christine Farquharson Profile
Christine Farquharson

@ckfarquharson

Followers
1K
Following
470
Media
116
Statuses
619

Economist @TheIFS. Research on early years, education and health.

Joined January 2014
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
7 days
RT @HelenMiller_IFS: It’s the end of an era @theIFS.Today is @PJTheEconomist’s last day. He’s been a fantastic Director and will be great….
0
21
0
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
8 days
RT @TomWatersEcon: I quite often get asked what I think about a wealth tax. A very good "elevator summary" of the economics of a wealth tax….
0
10
0
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
10 days
In light of today's announcements on Family Hubs, this @TheIFS podcast is looking even more timely!. A great discussion with @edballs and @PJTheEconomist on the benefits of Sure Start and the political economy of keeping early childhood programmes going.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
20 days
NEW PODCAST: The policy that changed childhood in the UK . @PJTheEconomist is joined by @ckfarquharson and @edballs to explore the legacy of Sure Start: what impact it had, how current services compare, and what we can learn from it. 🎧 Listen here:
Tweet media one
1
6
19
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
20 days
Ministers should absolutely be the main voice for government policy today. But they can’t be everywhere all the time. And sometimes, you really want to hear from the official who was across the nitty gritty detail of an area years before the government of the day took office.
0
0
1
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
20 days
Last month, we had a fantastic policy panel to launch @TheIFS Sure Start report. Great, nuanced discussion & deep insight from several officials working on the programme for >10yrs. History, context, detail. It was very nearly called off 3 days before because of this guidance.
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
21 days
Frankly outrageous from the govt. This new, and I think unprecedented, ban on civil servants speaking in public will damage public debate, politics, policy making and the civil service itself. What are they thinking?.
1
1
6
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
26 days
RT @kotaro_fujisaki: Anaïs Fabre (Institute for Fiscal Studies) presents “The Geography of Higher Education and Spatial Inequalities” to id….
0
6
0
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
RT @PJTheEconomist: Very striking this. Spending on new childcare entitlement is much greater than expected. What we don't know is whether….
0
12
0
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
RT @TheIFS: NEW: The popularity of new childcare entitlements could leave spending from 2026 onwards £1 billion higher than originally fore….
0
4
0
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
Thanks to @NuffieldFound for supporting much of the work that made this analysis possible - not something you want to tackle from scratch on Spending Review night!.
0
0
0
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
What is clear is that higher-than-expected take-up = higher-than-expected costs. Meeting childcare commitments looks much more expensive than we had thought in March 2023. That adds to the pressure on other public services.
1
0
0
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
So where does that leave us?.Childcare entitlements are really popular. Could be great news - if it's driven by more parents in work. But it's still too early to tell.
1
0
0
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
The Spending Review announced that spending would rise by £1.6bn in cash terms over the SR. A bit over half of this reflects the entitlement rollout anticipated in March 2023. But there's ~£600m to top up spending. That will meet most, but not all, of the spending pressures.
Tweet media one
1
1
3
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
But - when these entitlements were first announced in March 2023, then-Chancellor Jeremy Hunt planned to spend £4bn a year from 2026-27 onwards. So the long-term cost of childcare entitlements is on track to be £1 billion (!!) higher than we had originally thought.
1
0
1
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
A reasonable forecast for spending from 2026-27 onwards - once entitlements are fully rolled out - is around £5bn in today's prices. Could easily end up several hundred million lower or higher.
Tweet media one
1
0
1
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
But childcare entitlements are being rolled out over time. So the same % underestimate of take-up becomes a bigger deal in £ over time, as it applies to more hours.
1
0
1
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
Side note: almost all local authorities saw higher-than-expected take-up last year. The exceptions were (almost) all in London, where there is some evidence that eligible and interested parents are less likely to actually find a childcare spot. Might point to capacity issues?
Tweet media one
2
1
0
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
But we've already seen a BIG upwards revision in spending plans for 2024-25, driven by a big increase in expected take-up. We now think spending on new entitlements last year was £500m - 28%!! - higher than we had thought in December 2023.
Tweet media one
1
1
3
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
Forecasting demand for new childcare entitlements for working parents with kids under 3 was always going to be hard. Depends on:.* how many families are eligible.* how many families will move into paid work so they become eligible.* take-up amongst eligible families. Difficult!.
1
0
1
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
There are two issues here:.1) The big in-year revisions to spending we have already seen (for 2024-25).2) What higher-than-expected take-up might mean for costs in future years, once entitlements are fully rolled out.
1
0
1
@ckfarquharson
Christine Farquharson
1 month
Spending on the new childcare entitlements next year could be £1 billion higher than initially forecast in March 2023 - a 25% increase. So what's going on? I break down the numbers that @PJTheEconomist and @MaxWarnerIFS set out in @TheIFS' post-Spending Review briefing.
1
2
6