Paul Johnson Profile Banner
Paul Johnson Profile
Paul Johnson

@PJTheEconomist

Followers
64,286
Following
461
Media
883
Statuses
4,146

Director IFS. Father of four.

London, England
Joined March 2015
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Explore trending content on Musk Viewer
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Oh for goodness sake. What is the possible justification for cutting income tax rate while raising NI rate? Drives further wedge between taxation of unearned income and earned income. Yet again benefits pensioners and those living off rents at expense of workers
463
3K
11K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
Not much of a boast really to say that school spending per pupil will return to 2010 levels. A decade and a half without growth is quite a thing
88
2K
8K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Worth repeating. Take all the tax changes coming in over next few years and: If your income is < £155k, you lose If your income is > £155k you win If your income > £1m you gain more than £40,000
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Despite today's tax cuts middle earners are still set to lose as a result of tax changes over next years. The freezing of allowances and thresholds is still a big tax increase. Only those on over £155,000 will pay less tax overall. The very rich will pay tens of thousands less
46
900
1K
211
5K
8K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
1 year
Simply staggering numbers in OBR report. Real Household Disposable Income per person to fall more than 7% over next two years. Biggest fall on record. Taking incomes down to 2013 levels.
375
4K
8K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
£45 billion of tax cuts. This is biggest tax cutting event since 1972. Barber's "dash for growth" then ended in disaster. That Budget is now known as the worst of modern times. Genuinely, I hope this one works very much better.
369
2K
7K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
1 year
Recall that the government has spent months saying it can't find any money to prevent nurses and teachers getting very big pay cuts. He just found £6 billion to cut fuel duties. That's a choice.
252
2K
6K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
7 years
The government has an official position on fiscal effects of Brexit. This is it.
Tweet media one
189
7K
6K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
From a fiscal point of view important to remember cut to 45p rate was just about smallest part of the "mini budget". What was a £45bn tax cutting package is now a £43bn package. This U turn has, in itself, essentially no effect on fiscal sustainability.
173
2K
5K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
11 months
Staggering statistics. Real average weekly earnings are same today as in November 2005. A completely unprecedented period with no earnings growth. Hard to compare but likely this has not happened over any comparable period since Napoleonic wars.
@prospect_clark
Tom Clark
11 months
Long view on today's labour market stats is price-adjusted average pay is down £35/wk since Feb 2008 A drop from £532 to £497 over 182 months' of data Few would have guessed possible (without a revolution!) -- except those who knew the US horror story
28
163
452
216
3K
5K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
6 years
Extra spending can't be funded by Brexit dividend. 1) Govt has accepted Brexit will *weaken* public finances by £15bn pa 2) Financial settlement with EU plus commitments to replace EU funding already uses up all of our EU contributions in 2022 There is no Brexit dividend
186
4K
4K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
4 years
All that extra money announced by govt last week not quite what it seems. The "Rooseveltian" additional £5.5bn of capital spending represents an increase of precisely zero this year on Budget plans. Is a reallocation from one set of projects to another
105
3K
3K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 months
Buckingham Palace, valued at around £1bn, sits in band H and is charged £1,828 by Westminster City Council, less than an average three-bedroom semi in Blackpool...46% of households in England will receive a bigger council-tax bill than the Palace.
@tom_dog_1
Tommy P
3 months
@Occasional70366 @PJTheEconomist Look at the council tax for Buckingham Palace and the council tax for a 3 bed semi in Blackpool
2
39
99
152
2K
3K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
28 days
Sure Start worked. It had big long term effects on the educational achievement of poor children. Its demise is a study in policy failure - over centralisation, over extension, poor data, "not invented here syndrome".
79
1K
3K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Statement and chart are literally true. But do they reveal the truth? No. Economy grew strongly because it collapsed so much in 2020. Only interesting comparisons are with pre-covid levels. We've done less well than most of G7 since then.
@hmtreasury
HM Treasury
2 years
New GDP figures released this morning show the UK economy has reported the strongest growth since the Second World War.
Tweet media one
235
150
333
97
1K
3K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
This is actually awful. Yet more years of real incomes barely growing. High inflation, rising taxes, poor growth keeping living standards virtually stagnant for another half a decade
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
3 years
Over the next 5 years real household disposable income is expected to grow by 0.8% per year, well below the historical average. But growth had been weak in the decade before COVID, meaning average incomes are now expected to be 28% (£9,000 per capita) below the pre-2008 trend.
Tweet media one
32
407
498
122
2K
3K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
7 years
The idea that immigrants take jobs from natives is just a fallacy
Tweet media one
158
2K
2K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
One OBR chart not mentioned by Chancellor. Trade with EU sharply down, and consistent they say with their projection that reduced trade post Brexit would reduce productivity (hence living standards etc) by 4%. Which is bigger than expected long run effect of pandemic
Tweet media one
50
1K
2K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Remarkable quote from OBR document. Biggest fall in living standards since records began in 1950s
Tweet media one
46
1K
2K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
No extra money for health, schools or other public services despite huge increase in inflation. Likely implies big real pay cuts for most public sector workers. E.g. govt evidence to teacher review body asked for just 3% pay rise for most teachers as inflation averages over 7%
70
877
2K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
6 years
Every time I see this chart I am amazed. ONE in SIX 55-64 year olds owns a second property. It's the flipside of low ownership rates among the young - they are renting from their parents' generation. The allocation of housing, not just the quantity, matters.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
6 years
Multiple property ownership is becoming more common among older people than in the past, and these properties tend to be held onto throughout retirement (5/6)
Tweet media one
8
46
60
210
2K
2K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
A pretty good reading of my feelings when I spoke to @Steven_Swinford about this.
@Peston
Robert Peston
2 years
.⁦ @PJTheEconomist ⁩ does not often get angry. But you can feel the steam coming out of his ears in his quote to ⁦ @Steven_Swinford ⁩ about ⁦ @RishiSunak ⁩’s plan to cut the basic rate of income tax
Tweet media one
138
1K
3K
29
619
2K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
7 years
Those in born in 1980s have only half the wealth by age 31 of those born in 1970s. Remarkable reversal.
Tweet media one
166
2K
2K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
The big omission from this statement was anything for those subsisting on means tested benefits. They will be facing cost of living increases of probably 10% but their benefits will rise by just 3.1%. And cut compared to last year if you account for withdrawal of £20 UC uplift
73
871
2K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Inflation overall is 9%. But our analysis suggests that the poorest are facing an inflation rate or around 11%. That’s because they spend a large fraction of their budget on energy and food. Their benefits of course rose by just 3.1%.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
2 years
NEW: Average inflation reached 9% in the year to April, but the poorest households faced inflation rates of 10.9%. This is 3 percentage points higher than inflation rates for the richest decile. [THREAD: 1/4]
Tweet media one
23
464
542
41
1K
2K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Still have to pinch myself when I see this. Biggest cuts in funding per pupil have been in deprived schools outside London, precisely those which are already struggling the most.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
2 years
📊 #IFSSatStat : The new National Funding Formula has boosted funding for the most deprived fifth of schools the least (by less than 1%) since 2017. This follows bigger cuts for schools in deprived areas during the 2010s, esp. outside London, where educational outcomes are worst.
Tweet media one
11
258
274
62
1K
2K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
Where is the detail? This was a huge fiscal announcement with almost none of the detail mentioned to parliament and as far as I can see still no document published.
125
416
2K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Economic "orthodoxy" is not some strange belief system. It's an encapsulation of the knowledge drawn from decades of evidence based on experience of countries around the world. It needs testing and challenging, but experience tells us that simply dismissing it is dangerous indeed
73
336
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Abandoning IR35 changes. Hurrah. A tax evaders charter costed at £2 billion is not going to happen
203
205
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Disappointing to hear the chancellor again conclude by claiming to be cutting taxes. He emphatically is not. He is raising them, and to historically high levels. I think that is the right thing to do. But his tax plan is to raise taxes not, as he keeps saying, to cut them.
59
476
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
4 years
Your regular reminder that, whatever its merits as a policy, abolishing tuition fees is of no help to the half of young people who don't attend university, is of no help to low earning graduates, and is a big giveaway to the highest earnings graduates.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
4 years
The highest-earning graduates would benefit most from Labour’s policy of scrapping fees and bringing back maintenance grants. Loan repayments for the top third would fall by around £50k. Actual loan repayments for low-earning graduates would be almost completely unaffected.
Tweet media one
20
117
121
391
807
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
6 months
NB - chancellor just announced a long term cash freeze in investment spending. That's a significant real cut of course. We already have public sector investment well below that in most comparable countries. That is not good for growth.
31
708
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
6 months
You cannot understand poverty or inequality in the UK without understanding housing costs and what has been happening to them. They are a much bigger fraction of the budgets of the poor than the better off and have been rising far faster for the poor.
@xiaoweixu_
Xiaowei Xu
6 months
In 1968 housing costs made up 9% of average incomes for the poorest households and 4% for the richest. By 2021 this has gone up to 21% and 6% respectively. That is, housing costs now make up 3.5x as much of the budgets of the poor as of the rich. 🧵on our new @TheIFS report👇
Tweet media one
17
318
532
70
690
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Despite today's tax cuts middle earners are still set to lose as a result of tax changes over next years. The freezing of allowances and thresholds is still a big tax increase. Only those on over £155,000 will pay less tax overall. The very rich will pay tens of thousands less
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
2 years
Today’s measures mean that the richest tenth of households, who were set to lose around £3,500 a year (3%) on average by 2025-26 under Johnson and Sunak’s plans, will now gain around £700 a year (1%) on average. #minibudget
Tweet media one
7
218
282
46
900
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
5 years
Tax and spending promises by leadership candidates: - Raab: £30bn+ tax cut; - Hunt: £20bn+ more spending on defence; - Johnson: £10bn tax cut; - Gove: abolish VAT; Me in @thetimes on lack of seriousness. What are their actual fiscal strategies?
165
728
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
6 years
New piece on the NHS Brexit dividend. It does not exist. In fact we would need to spend £1bn a year more just to compensate NHS staff for the higher prices already seen since the referendum.
Tweet media one
68
2K
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
Again claiming increase in minimum wage is worth £1000 to a full time worker. Worth about £700 after tax and NI, and less than £300 to anyone on Universal Credit
20
606
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
5 years
Economy - and hence our living standards - is 2.5-3% (£55-£66bn) smaller than it would have been without Brexit vote. We have lost out on 3 years of global economic growth. Citi analysis in @TheIFS Green Budget published today
50
1K
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
This is what policy failure looks like.
@BenZaranko
Ben Zaranko
2 years
I just re-discovered this chart, showing how the number of home insulation projects delivered through government schemes fell off a cliff after 2013. From 1.3m loft insulations per year, to fewer than 100,000. With hindsight that feels... sub-optimal
Tweet media one
13
185
374
26
479
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
“UK is only G7 economy not to have re-attained its pre-pandemic level by Q2 2022”
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
2 years
. @Citibank 's Chief UK Economist Benjamin Nabarro presents on the economic outlook for the UK in our #IFSGreenBudget launch. Watch live here>
Tweet media one
1
24
42
48
707
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
Obviously not true in any seriouse sense. £1,000 gross not net. Anyone on UC will lose much more than half of that. Lots of people on UC are not on NLW. Etc etc
@HugoGye
Hugo Gye
3 years
Treasury confirms that national living wage will rise to £9.50/hr and says this will be £1,000 annual boost for a full-time worker - almost exactly replacing the impact of the universal credit uplift ending...
72
35
136
20
480
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
7 months
The 6 year freeze to income tax and NI thresholds really is a staggeringly big tax increase. It’s a key part of why taxes are rising to highest level ever. That such tax rises are needed reflects v high interest payments, poor growth and increasing spending pressures.
@BenZaranko
Ben Zaranko
7 months
The six year freeze to income tax and national insurance thresholds is now set to raise a colossal £52 billion in 2027/28. To give a sense of scale, that's equivalent to 6p on the basic and higher rate of income tax, or increasing the main rate of VAT from 20% to 26%.
Tweet media one
12
220
359
72
568
1K
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
4 months
Bluntly, if we want to reduce immigration we need to pay more for social care. If we don't want to pay more for social care we will continue to rely on immigrants.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
4 months
Both the Conservative and Labour parties have indicated a desire to bring down net migration. But substantially cutting migration could reduce the size of the workforce in key sectors. Workers from non-EU countries were 16% of the adult social care workforce in 2022–23. [12/14]
Tweet media one
12
27
64
247
353
981
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
6 years
Health is taking a bigger and bigger share of public service spending up from 23% in 2000 to 29% in 2010 and planned to hit 38% by 2023. At some point this is going to require higher taxes. We can’t just keep squeezing everything else.
176
544
957
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
OBR: "The rise in inflation to a 40-year high this year is expected to reduce real household disposable incomes (RHDI) on a per-person basis by 2.2 per cent in 2022-23 the biggest fall in living standards in any single financial year since ONS records began in 1956-57"
24
590
959
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
1 month
Pay for highest paid/most skilled public sector workers (doctors, experienced teachers etc) has been cut drastically. Public sector diverging ever further from private sector. Papering over the cracks by bringing in more from abroad. Not sustainable.
58
436
934
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
6 months
That, in a sentence, is what happened yesterday.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
6 months
@PJTheEconomist “How did Mr Hunt afford tax cuts when real economic forecasts got no better? He banked additional revenue from higher inflation, and pencilled in harsher cuts to public spending.”
Tweet media one
3
118
146
17
472
924
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
1 year
This is just astonishing. A doubling and more of the numbers in every age group moving on to Personal Indepence Payment (PIP - our main disability benefit) over just one year. This is NOT a catch up from people not claiming during Covid, it is a huge increase in claims.
@TomWatersEcon
Tom Waters
1 year
Here we zoom in on the increase in that yellow line. This is the number of new claims by single year of age in July 21 & 22. Huge increase at every age, and in mental and physical health. Mental/physical split little changed - and this is true more generally across conditions...
Tweet media one
9
38
162
45
431
906
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
6 years
Not that much to be Tiggerish about here. Growth forecasts dreadful compared with what we thought in March 2016, dreadful by historical standards and dreadful compared with most of the rest of the world.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
6 years
Growth outlook much weaker than 2 years ago #SpringStatement @ESRC
Tweet media one
4
71
38
76
1K
873
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 months
On a per person basis it’s considerably worse than the headline figures. This was a period of rapid population growth. On a per person basis GDP has been falling consistently for two years. Not sure calling this a “mild” or “technical” recession quite gets at the scale.
@faisalislam
Faisal Islam
2 months
Economy in Q4 2023 confirmed at £566.6 billion… (ABMI official measure) smaller than it was in Q1 2021 (£567bn. no net growth over two years, down 0.1%), and Smaller than in Q4 2022, when the PM and Chancellor arrived in Downing Street (£568bn … down 0.3%)…
15
87
146
24
444
900
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Just listened to the PM's statement. Can't quite believe nothing there about the cost. This is one of the biggest announcements in peacetime history, and apparently we'll be told how much in a few weeks. Not a complaint about the policy. But some transparency would be welcome
64
255
883
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 months
Not surprising, but so depressing. Govt know perfectly well that council tax is out of date, regressive, inequitable, inefficient, gums up the housing market, and is anti "levelling up". Total lack of courage to do anything about it. Also, note Opposition silence on this.
@Masonboyowen
Mason Boycott-Owen
3 months
🏠New: Government will not reform council tax Response to Levelling Up Committee is pretty clear on changing unfair bands: ⛔️ Too expensive to do ⛔️ Likely to hit pensioners
Tweet media one
14
20
44
65
292
875
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Try as hard as we can, given plausible forecasts, we can’t see how to get public finances on a sustainable path without big, painful spending cuts or a reversal of £43bn tax cuts just announced. Chancellor has a big job to reassure markets his mini budget spooked so badly
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
2 years
NEW: Getting government debt falling in the medium term with a weaker economy and without cancelling tax cuts could force @KwasiKwarteng into big and painful spending cuts. Read our #IFSGreenBudget findings, with @Citibank and funded by @NuffieldFound >
6
47
66
99
415
802
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
I still struggle to get my head round these statistics. One in seven of those around the age of 70 don’t just own their own home, but own a second home as well.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
2 years
85% of the #PlatinumJubilee generation are homeowners, meaning that most have benefitted from the house price boom that occurred during their working lives. 1 in 7 of them own a second home. [5/8]
Tweet media one
12
39
87
57
232
793
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
6 years
OBR pointing out UK has moved "from near the top of the G7 growth league table to near the bottom"
Tweet media one
64
1K
762
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
1 year
Sad thing is to a large extent this is the path we chose, not an inevitability. Brexit, yes. Also cutting capital spending in 2010s, cutting education, failing to reform planning or tax, failure of housing policy, topped off by years of damaging political dysfunction.
@ChrisGiles_
Chris Giles
1 year
Just to put things into perspective. If the UK economy had grown at the same rate after 2007 as it had in previous decades, every person in Britain would be £10,600 a year better off on average Economic growth matters ENDS
60
452
1K
36
267
787
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
4 years
This is not a complaint about policy. It is sensible to reallocate money especially at present time. It is a complaint about lack of clarity and transparency. It should not take us @theifs a week to work out what is going on. In part mea culpa, but really more transparency please
30
217
766
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
1 year
This is the first Budget I can remember in which there have been NO major announcements that weren't pre-briefed. Tell me if I'm wrong but I think we knew every major change before Mr Hunt stood up
63
147
786
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
10 months
Private school fees have risen 20% in real terms since 2010 and 55% since 2003. Numbers privately educated have been pretty constant that whole time. Removing tax exemptions likely to have only small effects on numbers. Net benefit to public finances likely to be £1.3-1.5bn p.a.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
10 months
NEW: How much revenue would be raised from removing tax exemptions from UK private schools? Our new report by @lukesibieta , funded by @NuffieldFound , calculates the net gain to the public finances from @UKLabour ’s proposed policy: [THREAD: 1/11]
Tweet media one
25
71
145
63
233
779
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Ben Nabarro “Total Uk trade 25 to 30% below its pre Brexit trend”. Especially big loss of high value professional service exports to EU. This is a big drag on the economy.
42
414
740
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
This is what has happened to yields on 10 year UK gilts today. This scale of movement so fast is highly unusual. Looks like markets are a little spooked by scale of fiscal giveaway
Tweet media one
32
304
726
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
Public spending per head in Scotland is c.30% higher than in England. Almost entirely paid for by transfers of revenue from England. SNP, and other Scottish parties, promised further big increases in spending, but said nothing about where the money would come from.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
3 years
📰 “Where were all the parties intending to get the money from to pay for all these goodies?” @PJTheEconomist in @thetimes this morning on the absence of costed promises in the Scottish elections. Read here (£) >
1
21
46
134
347
716
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
1 year
Rather than scrapping IHT we urgently need to reform it. It is genuinely unfair. The very wealthy pay an average rate half, or less, that paid by the moderately wealthy. If all you leave is the family house it's hard to avoid. If you have millions it is absurdly easy to avoid
@Samfr
Sam Freedman
1 year
Yes the big problem this country has is that the wealthiest 4% of families don't have enough money. Slow handclap.
Tweet media one
76
545
3K
39
239
726
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
6 years
Extra NHS funding at 3.4% p.a. means rises over next 5 years higher than over last 8, but still below long run average. Extra £20bn means higher borrowing or higher taxes. Former incompatible with manifesto commitment. Means health spending accelerating as % of total spending
Tweet media one
38
884
692
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
4 years
Inheritance tax should be the most progressive of taxes. But the wealthy have become so adept at avoiding it that it now imposes a higher burden on middle class estates than on the very wealthy. It's time to act. Me in @thetimes (chart from OTS)
Tweet media one
71
320
705
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
4 years
This from OFQUAL report is pretty striking. Big boost for private schools in A level grades awarded. FE and 6th form colleges seem to have lost out. Presumably because more weight given to teacher predictions in small 6th forms. Not obviously fair.
@michaelgoodier
Michael Goodier
4 years
Looks like sixth form and FE colleges have particularly lost out in the standardization process for this year's A Level results. Private schools reaping the benefits with a huge increase in grade A and above.
Tweet media one
145
2K
2K
58
588
686
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Everyone would like lower taxes. But need to be clear about consequences. Short run and long run issues. In short run OBR did say £30bn headroom against fiscal target. But that assumes spending rises only at rate set out in September when inflation expected to hit just 4%
95
244
676
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Quite a chart. Scottish govt has implemented over £500m of income tax increases (equivalent to >£5bn in UK terms) These have netted *nothing* in additional revenues relative to no devolution. Scottish incomes have risen more slowly, and income tax base has shrunk, relative to UK
@fiscalphillips
David Phillips
2 years
🚨 Three important (but so far little commented upon) nuggets from today's updated @scotfisccomm forecasts published alongside #scottishbudget . 1⃣ The continuing poor underlying performance of Scottish Income Tax revenues, driven by weaker employment and pay growth... [1/6]
Tweet media one
8
75
102
40
354
676
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
If Bank of England is right and inflation hits 13% in October then poorer households will experience inflation of c.18%. That's because they spend such a large fraction of their budgets on energy and food, prices of which are rising so fast. 18%...
26
399
659
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
4 years
It became apparent to us, bizarrely, through the Barnett formula! Allocation to Scottish government following last week's statement was just £21m. That was because total spending envelope so little changed by last week's announcement
22
369
640
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Big, expensive package from Rishi Sunak. In conjunction with tax rises already in place this is hugely redistributive - taking from high earners and giving to the poor
136
161
631
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
Creating an entirely new tax to fund health and social care. A massive and unncessary increase in complexity. Achieivng nothing that could not have been done within exitsitng income tax and NI systems
39
170
639
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
It wasn't actually a tax cutting Spring Statement. Rishi Sunak banked more in rising tax receipts, as inflation creates a lot of fiscal drag, than he gave away in tax cuts. Me in @thetimes
12
296
630
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
Expect the tax rises just announced to raise about £12 billion a year, about 0.5% of GDP. Remember that's on top of £25 bn of tax rises announced in the Budget. This is a huge year for tax rises: a permanent increase of 1.5% of national income to highest in peacetime
60
324
611
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
In 1990 1 in 15 taxpayers paid higher rate of income tax. By 2025 it will be 1 in 6. This is a very big change in the structure of income tax. The basic rate may have fallen but a lot of people are paying higher rates of income tax
72
250
605
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
This is just an astonishingly depressing statistic. Put that alongside huge growth of house prices and negative real returns on savings and you can see the struggle of younger generations in a nutshell.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
2 years
Workers born in the 1980s with median earnings now don’t earn any more than those born in the 1960s did at their age. We still don’t have the policy tools to boost the earnings of any other than the low-paid. [7/8]
Tweet media one
7
51
131
13
255
617
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
This will cost billions. Economic and fiscal constraints are real. It’s not just “Treasury orthodoxy” or a failure of imagination. The magic money tree really does not exist.
@BruceReuters
Andy Bruce
2 years
UK 10-YEAR GOVERNMENT BOND YIELDS ON TRACK FOR BIGGEST CALENDAR MONTH RISE SINCE AT LEAST 1957 - REUTERS ANALYSIS OF BANK OF ENGLAND AND REFINITIV DATA
24
169
431
24
231
595
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
4 years
Lots in Labour's manifesto today. One striking thing is the plan to take corporate taxes in the UK to the highest in the G7 and almost the highest in the whole OECD. This clearly comes with risks.
Tweet media one
128
390
566
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
4 years
An awful lot.. I still can't quite process this as a sum you could spend on PPE. Not far off entire social care budget for a year.
@GeorgeWParker
George Parker
4 years
I suspect the National Audit Office will have a close look at this..£15bn sounds like an awful lot of money
22
59
138
31
267
582
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
It is a sad truth that current budget balance in Mr Sunak plans will require the highest sustained tax burden in UK history and yet more cuts to spending on "unprotected" departments. A problem created by a decade of paltry growth followed by the deepest recession in history
49
284
575
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
A reminder that abandoning the cut to the 45p rate may be important politically. It may matter for the tone of government. It affects inequality. But it is of trivial importance fiscally. 95% of the tax cuts remain in place, and the problems of fiscal sustainability remain.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
2 years
Kwarteng's "£45bn package of tax cuts has now become a £43bn package - a rounding error in the context of the public finances." "He still has a lot of work to do if he is to display a credible commitment to fiscal sustainability." Our full statement>
Tweet media one
14
239
460
17
345
582
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
6 months
Inheritances are growing, but very unevenly shared. Inheritance tax revenues while small are also growing. But IHT is easily avoided by the wealthy. The case for reform, closing obvious loopholes, is overwhelming. The case for simply cutting it is not.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
6 months
Cutting inheritance tax isn’t quite as simple as its proponents suggest. @PJTheEconomist in the @thetimes this morning on the realities of reforming inheritance tax ⬇️
2
12
33
30
199
582
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
1 year
Note what the Chancellor did not mention. Nothing on public sector pay. No mitigation of big income tax rises coming in this April. No more money for public services post 2024.
20
290
580
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
5 months
I’m pretty grumpy. Lots to learn about responding to covid & future pandemics. A serious analysis of trade offs implicit in lockdowns, social costs etc is needed. But spending 4 years and £100m+ on who said what to whom in a series of legalistic confrontations is ludicrous.
@anandMenon1
Anand Menon
5 months
Just when you were starting to despair, it’s out. The latest episode sees @DrHannahWhite @PJTheEconomist and me discuss what we’ve learned from the COVID Inquiry
Tweet media one
6
10
22
52
102
577
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
1 month
Strong positive effects of SureStart on GCSE results for poorer children. More strong evidence that well designed early intervention can be very effective. Also shows importance of high quality evaluation. Great work by my colleagues. Policymakers take note.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
1 month
NEW: Sure Start, England’s first large programme to provide holistic support to families with children under five, greatly improved disadvantaged children’s GCSE results. Read @nridpathecon @Sarah_Cattan @carneiro_econ ’s report, funded by @NuffieldFound :
Tweet media one
22
560
878
14
259
573
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
4 years
Thanks Paul. Here are some of the other stats: one third of working age adults live in households entitled to Universal Credit 43% of adults don't pay income tax 129% - that's how much more generous basic benefits for pensioners are than for non-pensioners. Gap was 30% in 1990
@paullewismoney
Paul Lewis
4 years
Excellent Christmas statistics from @PJTheEconomist not least 58% of households in poverty contain someone who is in work well worth a read.
10
208
235
21
396
568
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
8 months
Poorest third of children won't benefit from £5bn expansion in childcare provision Over past 8 years share of poorer children eligible for free childcare fell by 30% We've moved away from helping development of poorest kids to supporting better off families with childcare costs
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
8 months
The March 2023 Budget announced a major expansion of the free childcare programme, offering new provision for children aged nine months to two years in working families. This is the largest and fastest expansion on record, doubling spending in just three years. [THREAD: 1/6]
Tweet media one
4
15
24
21
398
574
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
Another freeze in fuel duty. Once again rhetoric on environment and climate change not matched by reality of continually reducing tax on burning petrol and diesel
16
206
564
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
6 months
But...taxes on income and earnings are still much higher than three years ago. This undoes only a small fraction of the huge tax increase resulting from the freezing of income tax allowances and thresholds.
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
6 months
12% rate of employee NI rate down to 10%. I think this may be first cut in main employee NI rate in history (other than last year's reversal of last year's increase). If you are going to cut income tax or NI then yes, NI is the right one to cut.
21
31
165
22
232
540
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
5 years
If we go down the no deal route spending may rise initially. But the economy will be hit and spending will need to be reined in later on. That could mean another period of austerity. Without Brexit we would already have left austerity behind us.
@Calum_Masters
Calum Masters
5 years
We really should be consigning austerity to history, but we are in danger of talking our way into another dose of it. Sobering words from @PJTheEconomist for @MoS_Politics .
0
6
10
16
325
535
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
10 months
That’s a massive overestimate of GDP equivalent. £1.7 bn is less than 0.1% of GDP.
@PippaCrerar
Pippa Crerar
10 months
The government's own assessment is that joining CPTPP would actually provide a *£1.7 billion* boost to UK exports - the equivalent of 0.8% UK GDP...
311
675
3K
30
187
544
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
4 years
The £2bn green homes grant is also funded by underspends from elsewhere (don't know where). Also true of half the £400m for traineeships etc This may all be (probably is) perfectly sensible reallocation but the lack of transparency is remarkable
8
208
509
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
Cutting 45% rate *next* year expected, by HMT, to cost £2.4bn *this* year. Some very rich people will change timing of income, esp dividends and bonuses. Happened in reverse in 2010 when 50% rate introduced. Giving 6 months notice is expensive - and was unnecessary
14
209
524
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
1 year
Possibly most important chart in today's documents. Interest spending going through the roof. Responsible for most of the deterioration in public finances. High interest rates, high borrowing, high inflation, and huge amounts of debt held by Bank of England, cost us very dear
Tweet media one
35
322
495
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
This from @OBR_UK is spot on. Spending plans from 2022 include precisely nothing for dealing with additional pressures arising from the pandemic, of which there are plenty. In fact they involve spending cuts relative to pre-pandemic plans. Is that really credible?
Tweet media one
10
328
510
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
That is an extraordinary cut in the salaries of teachers over such a long period. Much worse than for workforce as a whole. Government can’t keep doing this. Consequences for teacher recruitment and retention, not to mention living standards, will become too much.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
3 years
NEW: Pay freeze will mean 8% drop in salaries of experienced teachers since 2007 and 4-5% for less experienced teachers. Read our full briefing written by @lukesibieta and Jonathan Cribb, funded by @NuffieldFound >
Tweet media one
11
147
140
41
347
500
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
5 months
Scots earning between £100k and £125k will now face a marginal tax rate of 69.5%.
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
5 months
So, the Scots now have starter, basic, intermediate, higher, advanced and additional rates of income tax.
45
51
205
75
137
492
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
3 years
The under 50s would pay two thrids of cost of social care if paid for through NI, with pensioner families paying almost nothing. An income tax rise still leaves pensioners paying just 14% of the cost, but is clearly far more equitable across generations.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
3 years
NEW: Families with pensioners would provide only 1.4% of the revenue from a NICs rise, compared to 14% if income tax rates were to increase instead. @StuartAdam_IFS compares the effects of increasing NICs and income tax rates to fund social care reform>
Tweet media one
2
38
57
49
182
498
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
4 years
Taken aback by ChX statement. Basically return to March schemes (dreamt up on the hoof in 24 hrs) as if nothing learnt since. Wasteful & badly targeted for self-employed. No effort at targeting sectors/viable jobs for employees. Big contrast to position just days ago.
42
185
481
@PJTheEconomist
Paul Johnson
2 years
What Mr Sunak has not mentioned is that public spending will not be increasing as much in real terms as announced in October as inflation takes its toll
12
187
477