Curtis B. Hurley Chair in Public Affairs Reporting, Missouri School of Journalism DC Program + investigative reporter alisonyoungreports
@gmail
.com DM for Signal
Transparency is a cornerstone of public confidence. Yet both the U.S. and British governments are keeping secret key details of a 2/1/2020 meeting where top international scientists discussed concerns the Covid-19 virus was possibly engineered.
After two lab workers diagnosed with fatal brain disease, five public research institutions in France have imposed a 3-month moratorium on the study of prions.
Drip, drip, drip... Troubling information continues to emerge from US govt agency files - via leaks and FOIA lawsuits - about joint US-Wuhan Institute of Virology experiments with coronaviruses prior to the pandemic.
"Wuhan scientists were planning to release enhanced airborne coronaviruses into Chinese bat populations to inoculate them against diseases that could jump to humans, leaked grant proposals dating from 2018 show."
In an important development in the search for how the Covid-19 pandemic began,
@WSJ
is reporting that new intelligence has resulted in the US Department of Energy (which runs labs) concluding that the SARS-CoV-2 virus most likely emerged from a lab leak.
My latest in
@USATODAY
: Fauci describes backstory of secretive Feb. 2020 meeting where an elite, international group of scientists discussed concerns the Covid-19 virus may have been engineered.
What I was writing about 7 years ago is what I’m still writing about today. Serious safety lapses occurring in biological research labs were downplayed and hidden back then. It’s a problem that continues at labs today:
#biosafety
#biosecurity
Here is my June
@USATODAY
article about this meeting that involved a pivotal discussion of Covid-19's origin. The NIH
#FOIA
office has since told me they will not reconsider the redactions made to withhold similar information from Fauci's + others' emails.
I have read this news article three times now and it is still not clear to me why these preprints, while interesting, merited a news alert from the New York Times for a story that couches the findings with phrases like "very likely" and "might have."
I’ve investigated lab accidents for 15 years. So it’s exciting to announce the April release of my book, Pandora’s Gamble. It shows why a possible lab origin of the pandemic should never have been dismissed as a conspiracy theory.
@centerstreet
@hachetteus
Troubling example of how federal agencies -- regularly + increasingly with each administration -- redact information from documents that the public has every right to see. How legit are other redactions in Fauci's emails?
#FOIA
#FOIAFriday
h/t
@thackerpd
WSJ: Emails show Facebook removed content related to discussions of Covid-19 origins in response to pressure from the Biden administration, including posts claiming the virus was man-made
Could the pandemic have started with a lab accident in Wuhan? Safety breaches with coronaviruses at a US research partner lab show how it’s possible for potentially infected workers to move about in public.
The Wall Street Journal says it has independently confirmed names of scientists reportedly sickened in Wuhan: A scientist on U.S.-funded coronavirus projects is among 3 Chinese researchers sickened by unspecified illness during the initial Covid outbreak
Drip drip drip... as time passes, more keeps coming out about how top scientists were publicly calling the lab-accident hypothesis for the pandemic a conspiracy theory -- yet privately fretting about the "nightmare of circumstantial evidence to assess"...
A small update to my recent
@VanityFair
#COVIDorigins
investigation. I obtained an additional email, sent from one leading scientist to another, as they drafted a crucial March 2020 letter, which argued that a lab accident was not plausible: /1
A reminder that legitimate news articles related to Covid origins questions – including my own reporting for
@propublica
about UNC's history of coronavirus lab accidents – got wrongfully flagged as disinformation by Facebook early in the pandemic. 1/
WSJ: Emails show Facebook removed content related to discussions of Covid-19 origins in response to pressure from the Biden administration, including posts claiming the virus was man-made
Some assert that the origin of Covid “is a scientific question best left to scientists.” Perhaps we should also leave oversight of banking solely to bankers? Or the investigation of an airline crash solely to the airline and the aircraft manufacturer? 1/
During my 15 years reporting on lab accidents, a troubling theme has emerged: When safety breaches occur during research with dangerous pathogens, labs – and the agencies that fund + oversee them – go to great lengths to keep these events secret from the public and policymakers.
Lancet Commission finding on origin of Covid-19: We just don’t know where virus originated. Natural and lab-associated origin are both viable theories. No dispositive evidence of seafood market origin, despite what you might have read, says chair Jeffrey Sachs.
As a journalist who has reported for more than a decade on laboratory accidents in the United States - for
@USATODAY
@propublica
+
@ajc
-- interesting to see that
@PeterDaszak
this morning blocked my Twitter account.
As an investigative reporter, I have spent more than a decade revealing shocking safety breaches that officials at laboratories in our own country don’t want the public to know about. My perspective in
@USATODAY
on the pandemic lab-leak hypothesis
New book reveals lax oversight + efforts to avoid reporting lab accident with a controversial gain-of-function H5N1 flu virus. (A first excerpt from Pandora’s Gamble is in
@USATODAY
) 1/ via
@usatoday
What certain high-profile scientists said in public vs what they said in private: There has been a troubling disconnect when it comes to concerns that Covid-19 could have come from a lab. Latest example revealed by
@emilyakopp
@USRightToKnow
1/🧵
Good to see
@CBS_Herridge
@CBSNews
following the money to Wuhan labs. Science leaves extensive paper trails: grant records, proposals, drafts of journal articles, cloud servers, emails at wide range of govt + private orgs + people.
“Frankly, the breathlessness and alacrity with which stories like this one are promoted, in the face of very incomplete and confusing ‘data’, leaves me frustrated and concerned,” said Stanford’s David Relman. Great opportunity for
#journalism
research.
“There had been at least 17 accidents among the 100 or so scientists and technicians in France working with prions in the previous decade, 5 of whom stabbed or cut themselves with contaminated syringes or blades.”..“It is shocking that no precautionary measures were taken then”
More on California lab with bioengineered mice: “They never had a business license," Zieba told USA TODAY. "The city was completely unaware that they were in this building, operating under the cover of night."
If the transcribed content of these
@NIH
emails involving Fauci, Collins + elite scientists is close to accurate, it’s clear why the agency fought to keep the emails secret, wrongfully denying access under
#FOIA
about key info related to Covid-19 origin
EXCLUSIVE: There was much more to why the US government halted research at USAMRIID in 2019, my new book, Pandora’s Gamble, reveals. Safety breaches included a lab leak of thousands of gallons of unsterilized lab wastewater. Excerpt via
@KFFHealthNews
:
“It seems that expert consensus was somewhat illusory, and it would have been well to remember that like the rest of us, scientists are prone to groupthink and nonscientific concerns can creep into their public statements.”
“We call on US government scientific agencies, most notably the NIH, to support a full, independent,and transparent investigation of the origins of SARS-CoV-2. This should take place…within a tightly focused science-based bipartisan Congressional inquiry”
A larger question: Why is it taking so many
#FOIA
lawsuits to extract this kind of high-importance public information? Why isn't
@WhiteHouse
@POTUS
directing
@NIH
to use its discretion to proactively release all records related to Wuhan Institute of Virology + EcoHealth + US $$?
Kudos to
@theintercept
for pursuing a
#FOIA
lawsuit to force NIH to release of 900 pages of records relating to funding of Wuhan Institute of Virology research. It goes to how avenues of investigation of the lab-leak hypothesis are available in still-hidden records here in the US
Thank you
@esaagar
@krystalball
for having me on Breaking Points today to talk about lab accidents -- and why the issue is bigger than what may have happened in Wuhan.
A “review of more than a dozen retracted papers from China shows a pattern of revising or suppressing research on early [Covid-19] cases, conditions for medical workers and how widely the virus had spread — topics that could make the government look bad.”
Troubling lack of transparency with this + other NIH
#FOIA
requests relating to the pandemic’s origin. Unfortunately too many agencies long ago forgot that records belong to the public. They have discretion to be transparent, yet focus on using technicalities to justify secrecy
Push-back in
@JVirology
against calls for⬆️research oversight says: “Importantly, no reported external outbreak of a human or agricultural virus has resulted from a US-based laboratory in the modern era of biosafety practices.” But US outbreaks have occurred w/other pathogens 1🧵
.
@jonstewart
on lab leak backlash: “The larger problem with all of this is the inability to discuss things that are within the realm of possibility without falling into absolutes and litmus-testing each other for our political allegiances…”
When my book Pandora's Gamble is released in a few weeks, it will expose for the first time new + outrageous safety failures at elite biological labs. It also will detail the efforts made to keep these failures secret -- including withholding documents under
#FOIA
...
How journalists have framed their coverage of the search for the origin of Covid - including what stories have and have not been covered by major media outlets + what sources of information have and have not been quoted - is very much something that needs deep and critical study.
@danengber
This is going to be one for journalism schools to study for decades — including the gullibility of so many journalists to it. I understand how it happened but it’s exactly what should be interrogated by aspiring investigators of all stripes.
Thinking today about how much fun it was being the editor of the student newspaper when
@UnivOfKansas
won the national championship… a few (cough) years ago. Excited to see tonight’s coverage by
@KansanNews
. Rock Chalk
@KUJournalism
!
For a hypothesis too long derided by vocal scientists & many journalists as a baseless conspiracy theory, the declassified U.S. intelligence summary indicates significant official concern about the plausibility that a lab accident may have caused Covid-19.
“What is under-appreciated is the potential conflict of interest among the scientists who dismissed the lab leak hypothesis at the outset in prestigious scientific journals…This provided the false impression that a natural spillover was the…consensus.”
One lab “only recently admitted the likely link between Jaumain’s illness and the accident,” which occurred in 2010. “We recognize, without ambiguity, the hypothesis of a correlation between Emilie Jaumain-Houel’s accident … and her infection with vCJD,” per a June 24 letter.
"It should not have required a somebody leaking documents from the Department of Defense to understand the dangerous research that was underway, but that's how it happened. So I want people to know, we have not yet been told the facts, and we need to get the facts," Sachs said.
On a lab origin of pandemic: “He’s an experienced virologist. He was also head of the CDC at the time this was happening, which means that in addition to everything that we know, he had access to raw data and raw intelligence that was coming out of China.”
Coverage by
@APNews
notes "sharp reversal of the U.N. health agency’s initial assessment of the pandemic’s origins. WHO concluded last year that it was 'extremely unlikely' COVID-19 might have spilled into humans from a lab."
“A bipartisan group of U.S. senators is reviving efforts to establish a national Covid-19 task force modeled on the 9/11 Commission to investigate the U.S. government response to the pandemic and the disputed origins of the virus.”
Push for Wisconsin bill that would ban high-risk experiments in state cites 2019 UW lab safety breach with gain-of-function flu virus revealed only because of my new book Pandora’s Gamble. 1/4
After late/thin report released on Friday evening, new 7 business day deadline given to director of national intelligence to provide “any and all” information about possible role of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the origin of the pandemic.
The sponsor and co-sponsor of the Covid-19 Origin Act sent a letter today to ODNI blasting the report it released last Friday. They tell Avril Haines to "try again":
My book Pandora's Gamble is finally out today. Did Covid-19 start with a lab accident? History shows there are a stunning number of ways that lab accidents happen. The only thing rare about these events -- is the public rarely finds out about them.
Lab accidents and sloppy biosafety are a far greater problem - in the US and around the world - than the public knows. Calls for an investigation of a lab origin of the pandemic should never have been dismissed and ignored.
NIH
#FOIA
officer: Info not appropriate to disclose "because of the amount of misinformation surrounding the pandemic and its origins.” Adds
@thackerpd
"Seriously, the NIH is now arguing...they can’t release facts that might clear up misinformation about how the pandemic began."
NIH Tries Sealing Name of Chinese Researcher Attached to Discredited Pandemic Origin Study
Court documents find NIH heavily redacts records in a haphazard fashion before making them public
#FOIA
/1
Congressional subpoena issued for communications of key US scientist who in early weeks of the pandemic expressed concerns that the Covid-19 virus looked like it may have been engineered - then quickly changed opinion after secret meeting that NIH’s Anthony Fauci helped organize.
🚨SUBPOENA ALERT🚨
@COVIDSelect
announces its FIRST subpoena for “Proximal Origins” author Kristian Andersen’s private communications with the paper's co-authors & related info on COVID-19 origins.
We are following the breadcrumbs of a COVID cover-up straight to the source!
“In April and May 1979, at least 66 people died after airborne anthrax bacteria emerged from a military lab in the Soviet Union. But leading American scientists voiced confidence in the Soviets’ claim that the pathogen had jumped from animals to humans.”
Several measures targeting oversight of safety at biological research labs - plus a new
#FOIA
exemption for lab accident data - are part of Pandemic & All-Hazards Preparedness & Response Act reauthorization bill receiving hearing today by
@GOPHELP
@HELPCmteDems
. More in this🧵
Why is
@NIH
requiring
#FOIA
lawsuits to pry out these public records? "The unusually dated EcoHealth Alliance progress report adds to a string of missing, incomplete, or disappeared information that could be relevant to the origins of the pandemic."
Great questions from
@JordanHarbinger
about why even the world’s most prestigious biological research labs have a long history of egregious safety breaches and how the failure to address oversight in the US and around the world is putting us all at risk.
NPR journalist says network lost its way when it started telling listeners how to think. “Reporting on a possible lab leak soon became radioactive…Again, politics were blotting out the curiosity and independence that ought to have been driving our work.”
New letter from congressional committee raises many questions, including: Why would the FBI be communicating with coronavirus expert Ralph Baric about how the University of North Carolina was responding to state public records requests?
#foi
#foia
🚨NEW🚨
Why is
@FBI
in direct and ongoing communication with renowned corona-virologist Dr. Ralph Baric about the origins of COVID-19?
Today, we requested documents and a transcribed interview with FBI Special Agent (𝐑𝐄𝐃𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐄𝐃) who was communicating with Dr. Baric.👇
Important thread + article looking at the question: "Why did so many journalists dismiss as a conspiracy the idea Covid-19 leaked from a lab in Wuhan?" News organizations, journalists + journalism researchers need to take a hard look at past and ongoing coverage.
New from me: a deep dive on why the media—and the New York Times in particular—were so slow to investigate the Wuhan lab linked to the Covid-19 pandemic.
🧵 The highlights:
3 sources told me they approached the NYT with evidence that a lab leak was plausible, but were ignored.
The biological research community has a long history of resisting oversight. It was a cultural issue that frustrated Arnold Wedum, the father of modern biosafety, my research for Pandora’s Gamble found. This history is important in understanding current public policy challenges.
NIH to intensify scrutiny of foreign grant recipients in wake of COVID origins debate - drawing outrage from researchers who consider the oversight “heavy-handed” and burdensome, with the potential to stifle international research collaboration.
A confidential Feb. 2020 teleconference among elite scientists early in the pandemic played a pivotal role in shaping views + stifling legitimate questions about the lab accident hypothesis. My latest in
@USATODAY
Some good information in this
@nytimes
piece. But it’s concerning that it seems to frame the lab leak theory as a Republican hypothesis in this section, when it’s a hypothesis the WHO, Lancet Commission + many others outside of politics consider plausible.
Exactly this: “We’re finding out that with these private labs, there really isn’t as much regulation as there is for publicly funded labs, labs that receive grants,” said Harper. “There’s no one technically looking for them.”
Only by filing a
#FOIA
lawsuit did group find “that NIH Director Francis Collins was reviewing and clearing FOIA requests from reporters, an odd use of time by the director of a public health agency in the midst of a pandemic.” H/t
@thackerpd
For years hospitals have ignored childbirth safety practices known to save mothers' lives. New accreditation standards would make some mandatory. Experts call it a key "stick" to make change happen.
So many unanswered questions throughout this report, including this: “At this point, it’s still unclear why the sequences were posted to GISAID last week. They also vanished from the database shortly after appearing, without explanation.”
Fascinating read by
@KatherineEban
that is full of revelations and new insights about the struggles in science to address the growing international security and public health risks from advances in biotechnology.
True: “And so the [news] outlets that were swift to discredit any discussion of the Wuhan lab have been forced into an embarrassing about turn. But even the climbdown bears the stench of self-satisfaction and dishonesty.” But reason is beyond politics(1/2)
“Like all humans, the people working in laboratories make mistakes and they sometimes cut corners or ignore safety procedures – even when working with pathogens that have the potential to cause a global pandemic.” My latest piece for
@guardian
"This is a well-researched book describing the shocking history of laboratory mishaps and leaks ... The incidents...would challenge believability if not for the copious volume of supporting facts and references cited throughout the book."
My book - Pandora's Gamble: Lab Leaks, Pandemics, and a World at Risk - is being released on Tuesday. Available for preorder now and delivery that day:
Well… I’ve never had an interview about lab accidents quite like this one today … complete with a bit of Elvis Costello’s “Alison” and the host stripping off his shirt… Thanks to
@rustyrockets
for today’s conversation.
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre did not directly answer whether the president would sign the legislation, saying, "We're taking a look at the bill."
Journalists need to be routinely insisting on access to the inspection, accident and enforcement records of biological research labs. Great to see this important series by
@MaraHvistendahl
Such a telling quote on the state of the search for the origin of Covid: “Nothing personal, but I'm not prepared to take part in anything that gives air time to the lab leak conspiracy horseshit," said one virologist.
“Developing self-spreading viruses for environmental release is another example of risky virology research … all in the name of pandemic preparedness, but where it is far from clear that the anticipated benefits outweigh the very clear risks.”
In advance of Tuesday’s congressional hearing examining the backstory of an influential scientific paper on the origin of Covid, it’s worth re-posting what Anthony Fauci told me in 2021 for
@USATODAY
about the secret Feb 1, 2020 meeting preceding the paper
The important debate that is playing out in the scientific community over the legitimacy of doing a forensic investigation of any lab-accident origin for Covid-19 deserves far more journalistic scrutiny than it has been given.
With all due respect for fact that different people have differing motives and sincerity, I think we need both more investigation of COVID-19 origins and more careful thought about safety of work with potential pandemic pathogens.
“Critics view pathogen research as the Wild West of science. Virologists have faced online abuse and even death threats amid fears that what they do is dangerous,” writes
@JoelAchenbach
. But it’s not just those traditionally labeled as critics…1/
My opinion in
@AMIposts
Instead of grappling only with the fact that scientific research might have caused this pandemic, we now also have to contend with whether & how members of the scientific community have suppressed inquiry into a laboratory origin.
Too much of what passes as news coverage of the search for the origin of Covid-19 fails examine the backstory of how the sausage that is science is made. Not so in the latest from
@KatherineEban
@alisonannyoung
If you’re buying into the lab leak bullshit, you have no business teaching journalism to anybody. Do your homework so you won’t be taken in by frauds.
Fascinating testimony from Holden Thorp, editor-in-chief of Science, including remorse for a dismissive Tweet about the lab-leak hypothesis; also concerns about recently surfaced records about EcoHealth/Wuhan Institute of Virology research plans. Live:
This finding shows it may still be possible to unearth new evidence about how the pandemic began even if the Chinese government and the Wuhan Institute of Virology won’t open their records to independent investigators. via
@usatoday
NIH says need for "less speculation and more scientific cooperation, especially from China" in search for origin of SARS-Cov-2. Worth noting news orgs are having to file lawsuits against NIH to force it to comply w/ Freedom of Information Act to get Covid origin records.
#FOIA
NIH Director Francis Collins, who is retiring, just put out a statement about the origins of COVID.
"NIH wants to set the record straight on NIH-supported research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology."
As journalists, we need to be clearer in explaining to readers what it means when members of the WHO team say they didn’t find evidence to support the lab leak theory. Assurances in conversations with lab officials in Wuhan isn’t in-depth investigating.
I continue to be proud of our 2015
@USATODAY
investigation of biolab accidents. A worthwhile read in the wake of the WHO expert team's statements this week that lab accidents are rare + good safety protocols make it unlikely a virus could cause an outbreak