Essi Kujansuu
@EssiEconomist
Followers
282
Following
2K
Media
6
Statuses
181
Experimental economist. Post-doc at Innsbruck, visiting researcher at Turku, PhD from EUI.
Joined May 2016
It wasn't me this week, but I have encountered the same problem many times. I wonder, do not these people know how the internet works?.
We did not want to start the week like this, but here we are. Yet again our chair’s inbox is filled with messages from replicators who have opened “replication” folders only to find names, Social Insurance Numbers, mental-health diagnoses and incomes of study participants. 🧵.
0
2
5
RT @heimbergecon: Investigative journalists found that the Finnish finance ministry selectively cited our study (with @SGechert) on the gro….
0
49
0
RT @I4Replication: #GDRI_rep Update 7: Retraction! Our comment of "Parent–teacher meetings and student outcomes: Evidence from a developing….
0
36
0
RT @I4Replication: We will publicly release these reports shortly. We have requested several replication packages over the past months. U….
0
3
0
RT @I4Replication: #GDRI_rep Update 6: Some of the authors have responded to our report on "Raising Health Awareness in Rural Communities"….
0
12
0
"No reason" is the most common reason for retracting a paper in economics. Sounds like a "no problem" to me.
@jrgptrs @RexDouglass I was so blown away by this I had to look into it - these guys claim 55 retractions ever by 2018 but only TWO were explicitly for research fuckery which is maybe what you're pointing at?
0
0
1
RT @I4Replication: 🚨 New Special Issue Alert! 🚨 . This special issue of Economic Inquiry on reproducibility & replicability in economics is….
0
11
0
RT @kotsadam: This gem is hidden in the response to the response. ”…within a few hours and under extreme time pressure 11,843 households we….
0
8
0
A response to a re-response to a response to a report.
Our full report and our codes are here: This OSF page also includes the authors' response, our response to their response and a second authors response to our response to their response.
0
0
3
RT @I4Replication: #GDRI_rep Update 5: We have a new report. We reproduced the paper entitled "Partisan Effects of Information Campaigns in….
0
11
0
RT @paulnovosad: Oof. Replication of "Parent-teacher meetings" (EER 2019). "40 schools were selected randomly for the treatment. The remai….
0
32
0
RT @Josh_Merfeld: @aortmannphd Thanks! I'm sure I missed some key points. I did it rather quickly over my morning coffee :).
0
1
0
RT @Josh_Merfeld: New report just dropped. Time for a thread. You can find the replication report and the author's response in the linked….
0
22
0
RT @I4Replication: #GDRI_rep Update 4: We have a new report. We reproduced the paper entitled "Parent–teacher meetings and student outcomes….
0
14
0
RT @ollehammar: In a new @I4Replication report we replicate Islam (2019). Main issue: the randomized controlled trial was not randomized. A….
0
6
0
COPE offers chart on what to do when researchers ask their names to be withdrawn: the first challenge is to determine if there is reasons to suspect misconduct. who determines this and how?.
@I4Replication COPE has guidelines on this:
0
0
0
RT @I4Replication: We have no insights or knowledge about the practice of withdrawing author names. This is new to us. Some journals are al….
0
4
0