Happy anniversary, @TuckerCarlson.

"Democrats should also stop hiring the revolving-door corporate consultants who drove the party's working-people brand into the ground." Was that line in there?

Not a hero. Not a president.

Warren's speech today impugned greedy billionaires & their millionaire minions who control the Dem Party. She voiced obviously true stuff we're told never to say - which is why those millionaire minions in media have logged on to smarmily vilify her.

@ewarren @DKThomp @TheWelcomeTeam @osbornforne @benwikler @NYCMayor @ZohranKMamdani @PodSaveAmerica 5) Finally, this has to be called out. Critics went small, talking about MA election results, instead of addressing Warren's actual points. To @milansingh03's credit, he said the quiet part out loud, "I think 'run against billionaires' is a great message for Democrats. The point

@ewarren @DKThomp @TheWelcomeTeam @osbornforne @benwikler 4) Abundance. This ended up being predictable catnip. Knee jerk responses outweighed rational focus on what Warren said. She called for government streamlining (something @NYCMayor @ZohranKMamdani also did, telling @PodSaveAmerica that anyone who wants government to think big

@ewarren @DKThomp @TheWelcomeTeam @osbornforne 3) The third area of critique is over big structural change. Not the words "big structural change" -- which people can disagree with as a slogan (and only got one passing reference today). But rather, the fundamental question @BenWikler and others posed post-election last year --

@ewarren 2) The next substantive question is naming villains. @DKThomp famously said at @TheWelcomeTeam Fest, “Stories are for children.” Even people on stage with him were embarrassed. No worries, Thompson is not a political practitioner, so we can forgive. Dan @osbornforne,

1) A tension. Most of today's critics believe Democrats should focus on appealing to working people (including Trump voters) and not focus on culture war issues or identity politics. When asked in Q&A about non-economic issues today, @ewarren -- a leading progressive senator --

What saddens me most about the reaction from @liamkerr @mattyglesias @jbarro @ThirdWayKessler and a few others today is that these smart people apparently didn't watch @ewarren's speech before critiquing it. Some engaged in ad hominem attacks about her instead of addressing the

NEW: 12 years ago, Elizabeth Warren became one of the most popular politicians by telling hard truths about her own party. But then Senate culture pushed her into party "team player" mode, which was a huge tragedy. In a speech today, the old Warren is back, which is a big deal.

It seems to me that all who preach leaning away from culture war issues to appeal more to working people (including those who voted Trump) should be applauding progressive leaders who preach economic populism. What's to attack? Fighting billionaires? Big picture solutions?

This assertion from Yglesias is quite damning -- for Yglesias. He is claiming it is "basic reality" that Elizabeth Warren is "an electoral underperformer" and that anybody who doesn't understand that shouldn't be trusted to understand more complicated things. But he appears not

Warren on Abundance: "When this agenda is about making government more effective, count me in... Instead, Abundance has become a rallying cry for wealthy donors and other corporate Dems who are putting big-time muscle behind making Dems more favorable to big biz." Then this:

So @ewarren is going there! Populists & Democratic strategists cannot pretend that the "Abundance Agenda" proclaimed by @ezraklein & @DKThomp (and the BigTech network who funds and amplifies the full movement) is consistent with taking on the real enemy, corrupt economic elites.

In big speech about future of the Dem Party, @ewarren defines the big tent: "Yes, Democrats need a big tent. But there are two visions for what a big tent means. One vision says that we should shape our agenda and temper our rhetoric to flatter any fabulously rich person looking

Big point from @ewarren at @PressClubDC speech on future of the Democratic Party: "After the 2024 election, pundits sliced and diced demographic groups – across race, age, religion, and geography – to show how Democrats need to grow our coalition in order to win again. Yes, we

Important from @Ewarren in big speech right now, link below to watch: "According to some self-described experts, Democrats lost power because we were too progressive. For a lot of powerful people – wealthy people from Wall Street, Silicon Valley, and Washington – “too

Pro Trump Supporter Bari Weiss is in charge of CBS News. This CBS story was not aired on TV. Here is the segment.

Imagine if there were perp walks during the Wall Street collapse the way they are doing right now...

"Donald Trump can't run America. Now he wants to run Venezuela?" - @PramilaJayapal on @MSNOWNews