Vojtěch Strnad Profile
Vojtěch Strnad

@vostrnad

Followers
655
Following
56K
Media
38
Statuses
1K

Inscriptions were possible before Taproot | Make crypto cryptography again

Joined December 2012
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@fanquake
Michael Ford
16 days
The Bitcoin Core development process and distribution model actually makes it somewhat harder to fix security issues, compared to other serious software distributors. Take Google Chrome as an example. The CVE fixing happy path is to develop and review a fix in private, push that
Tweet card summary image
github.com
Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree. Contribute to bitcoin/bitcoin development by creating an account on GitHub.
@chataros
Adriano
16 days
@adam3us They can always push security fixes in v29 like any serious software distributor does, not forcing anyone to upgrade to unwanted/unprepared for functional changes… and I should know I work for a software editor for 15+ years
27
73
275
@vostrnad
Vojtěch Strnad
1 month
GM. There's no way a change to Bitcoin Core's default relay policy could have a snowball's chance in hell of killing Bitcoin. (This will be even more true if/when we activate the consensus cleanup soft fork.)
3
1
9
@vostrnad
Vojtěch Strnad
5 months
@BitcoinMerges
Bitcoin Merges
5 months
Merged PR from instagibbs: policy uncap datacarrier by default
0
0
1
@vostrnad
Vojtěch Strnad
5 months
Now that PR #32406 is merged, can we go back to debating CTV+CSFS please?
5
9
53
@bitcoincoreorg
Bitcoin Core Project
5 months
A statement on Bitcoin Core development and transaction relay policy -
bitcoincore.org
Bitcoin Core development and transaction relay policy
411
179
691
@salvatoshi
Salvatore Ingala
7 months
Some updates on OP_CHECKCONTRACTVERIFY: - BIP draft: https://t.co/kv6jb7iiqA - bitcoin-core concept implementation: https://t.co/O6sYUCfDGC - Delving post:
1
19
50
@Free_Ross
Free_Ross
9 months
FREEDOM!!!!
5K
14K
121K
@vostrnad
Vojtěch Strnad
1 year
Compiling a list of filming locations, this one did take a solid two minutes to find. @peterktodd 50°08'45.6"N 14°12'05.9"E
1
0
4
@BitMEXResearch
BitMEX Research
1 year
Referral to the Crown Prosecution Service "In these circumstances, as set out in the whole of my Main COPA Judgment, I have no doubt that I should refer the relevant papers in this case to the CPS for consideration of whether a prosecution should be commenced against Dr Wright
@BitMEXResearch
BitMEX Research
1 year
COPA vs CSW – Injunctions Published https://t.co/tCcfAoU82T
1
14
106
@vostrnad
Vojtěch Strnad
1 year
My node still has a few peers running 0.20.1 or earlier. I expect these to disappear from the network within a few days as they are either speedily updated or remotely crashed. Don't run unmaintained software people.
@darosior
Antoine Poinsot
1 year
Today we announce the new disclosure policy the Bitcoin Core will adopt for most reported vulnerabilities. We also publicly disclose 10 vulnerabilities affecting Bitcoin Core versions lower than 0.21.0. https://t.co/yRa4QrNXTT https://t.co/fbRnnzHp5Q
0
0
6
@FractalEncrypt
FractalEncrypt ∞/21M
1 year
Okay. Let's go! Feed me all the Easter eggs you can find in this transaction. I agree there's art here.
@Rob1Ham
Rob Hamilton
1 year
The nLockTime epoch timestamp is the genesis block timestamp 🤌 This transaction should be framed in a museum.
3
3
16
@mononautical
mononaut
1 year
what did they mean by this? https://t.co/4S8jM2grem
27
19
181
@mononautical
mononaut
1 year
yo @okx, did you misplace a decimal point on these consolidation fee rates?
33
17
232
@ajtowns
Anthony Towns
1 year
BIP 101 was proposed in June 2015 for activation in January 2016. Under its rules, the blocksize now would be 154MB.
16
41
199
@BitMEXResearch
BitMEX Research
1 year
Thanks to @pwuille, whose witness statement was "the most significant document in this Trial" and "used to devastating effect"
21
38
237