Buckingham Palace has not responded to Harry's book. But an insider told The Times: "It is exhausting, it is exasperating, but it is not distracting. It will burn itself out."
I wrote this just over a year ago. I still haven't heard anything from them. Will tomorrow be the day when I finally learn what the "massive inaccuracies" in my Meghan bullying story were?
No, I didn't think so.
So, Meghan's lawyer Jenny Afia said on the BBC there were 'massive inaccuracies' in my Meghan bullying story. How odd. Perhaps she would care to let me know what they were.
So, Meghan's lawyer Jenny Afia said on the BBC there were 'massive inaccuracies' in my Meghan bullying story. How odd. Perhaps she would care to let me know what they were.
Inspired by an excellent piece in the Telegraph (which in turn may have been inspired by a tweet of mine the other day) this is a thread exploring how distorted Harry's view is of the media.
Colbert acts as if the cancer diagnosis came completely out of the blue. In a sense it did. But the palace said she had had surgery, and would be away for several weeks. So she hadn't "disappeared". She was doing what they said she would. And clearly was not in a great place.
WATCH: A remorseful
@StephenAtHome
on his The Late Show following his recent jokes about the Princess of Wales and the rumours about her disappearance and marriage.
“I tell a lot of jokes” he says but wishes Kate a “swift and thorough” recovery 👇
@colbertlateshow
I sometimes worry about Harry, I really do. In Spare he complains that Meghan's lawsuit against the Mail on Sunday which they announced in Oct 2019 was "barely covered at all" in the newspapers.
@valentinelow
You were spot on
@valentinelow
Not a tiara, not quite a floral headpiece, but a jewelled floral headpiece. Spectacular though and fabulous that Princess Charlotte is wearing a matching slighter version. Picture perfect family.
#Coronation
Here's a question. Imagine that Harry had stepped down as a working royal, but it had all been done amicably, and that relations with his father and brother had remained cordial. Where would he have been sat in the abbey? Not third row back, I suspect.
The first extract from Courtiers, my look at what goes on behind palace walls, will appear in The Times on Saturday. Should anyone be kind enough to want to buy a copy of the book, here's a link:
Anderson Cooper, who has interviewed Prince Harry for CBS, is no ordinary hack: his great aunt (Thelma Furness) had an affair with Harry's great-great-uncle (Edward VIII, then Prince of Wales). Credit to
@chefjohnny84
for this nugget.
Fascinating story by
@victoria_ward
. The question is, why does the Sussex camp want to leak all this? Is it Meghan trying to prevent an outbreak of peace between Harry and his father? And intriguing that they should resort to the sort of briefing that they condemned in others.
The Duchess of Sussex expressed her concerns about unconscious bias in the Royal family in a letter to the King, The Telegraph can reveal.
It is understood that the correspondence was sent in the wake of the March 2021 Oprah Winfrey interview
Read more:
Many of Harry's complaints about the press are legitimate. He went through much when he was young. And yes, the hounding of Diana by the paps played a role in her death. But his view has become so twisted that he can no longer see the truth. He only sees what he wants to see.
The Sun today takes issue with Harry's claim that the media did not cover the plight of Britain's war wounded. Given that the paper campaigned endlessly on this subject, they have a point.
A bit more insight into why Camilla opted to use Queen Mary's crown for the coronation. When Queen Mary had the crown made in 1911 - paying for it with her own money - it was her intention that it should serve as the permanent consort's crown for future generations.
Congratulations to Omid Scobie, whose book Endgame sold 6,448 copies in the UK in its first week. That is almost as many as my book Courtiers, which sold 6,520 in its first week.
It was all overwhelmingly positive. No-one said it was an unmitigated disaster. But that's how Harry saw it. The same thing with the coverage of Meghan's lawsuit against the Mail on Sunday. Barely covered, said Harry. In reality, wall-to-wall coverage, including p1 of The Times.
Interesting column in The Times today by Emma Duncan, in defence of Prince William: who, she says, is not a racist. What a state of affairs, that that needed saying.
In Spare he recounts various events in his life when he says the press coverage was overwhelmingly negative. But if you look at what actually appeared in the papers, he gets it totally wrong.
Had an interesting time talking to Megyn Kelly about Prince Andrew, Harry & Meghan and Courtiers (out now in the US). She knows her stuff! And she has firm opinions...
@MegynKellyShow
@StMartinsPress
Currently in NYC doing publicity for the US edition of Courtiers. Doing lots of interviews with some great people, including a podcast called Feisty Side of Fifty. I'd better watch out...
Also in The Times: Harry claims the Sandringham summit was "a fix". He points the finger of blame at the Queen's private secretary, Sir Edward Young - or the Bee, as Harry calls him.
Polarised thinking insists that only one side in any argument can be right. Life though is messy & royal life very much so. People seeing
@valentinelow
's book Courtiers either as a smear against Meghan or proof that she deserves the unhinged criticism piled on her miss this point
"The papers... pronounced the trip an unmitigated disaster. They portrayed Meg as pushy, uppity, ignorant of royal protocol, because she'd made the unmistakable mistake of getting into a car before Granny."
Very excited about publication day for the paperback of Courtiers! (It's also my wedding anniversary, so all round a pretty good day. It may involve champagne).
Also pieces in the Mail, Sun, Telegraph, Guardian etc. And hundreds of thousands of words across the press devoted to the case as it unfolded, all the way to Meghan's victory.
In the Mail, Tom Bower says that in my book Courtiers I say Sam Cohen complained behind the scenes that she had been "treated harshly" while working for Harry and Meghan. This is not true. I wrote: "More than once, staff felt they were treated harshly." No mention of Sam there.
Meghan is wearing a dress by Ralph and Russo, and a sweater by Victoria Beckham. I CANNOT BELIEVE that I am the first to say this. I will never live it down.
Wonderful review of Courtiers in the Spectator by Mark Bolland. "A suave history of the monarchy... gives us a remarkable insight into the unseen operation of the monarchy."
Just want to correct a small point of fact in the latest column for Harper's Bazaar by
@scobie
. He says that last week the palace briefed The Times that Meghan wanted to be royal “the Beyoncé way”.
Not guilty. It was the Sunday Times. Different paper, different journalist.
The Queen's doctors have been telling her to slow down. Well, she has just been photographed driving round Windsor, looking right as rain. And definitely not slowing down.
#RoyalFootOnTheGas
Given that legal letters have been sent by the Sussexes' lawyers as well as the palace's since the story was published, it seems I was wrong in assuming that it came from the Sussex camp. Sorry to all about that. But even more intriguing!
This excellent bit of sleuthing comes from the very wonderful Laura Elston of the Press Association, who is as impartial a witness as you could hope for.
4/5
This statement from the Sussexes re Archie and Lilibet came overnight: “The children’s titles have been a birthright since their grandfather became Monarch. This matter has been settled for some time in alignment with Buckingham Palace.”
Anne raised her hands in the air, laughed and said: "It's just me," adding a moment later "and this lot" as she pointed to the members of the household behind her.
3/5
Instead the Queen, after greeting the Donald (and the Melania), turned to Anne to see who was next. But there wasn't anyone waiting: Trump was the last leader to be received by the Queen.
2/5
The Other Book, BTW, costs £28 and doesn't even have any pictures. Or an index. Whereas Courtiers has lots of pictures! In colour! And costs just £20. Sounds like a bargain to me.