Steve Haroz 📊👁️🧠
@sharoz
Followers
4K
Following
22K
Media
2K
Statuses
20K
Visual perception, cognition, and data vis scientist (he) 🦋 @steveharoz.com R guide: https://t.co/g5IbDiM3hc StatCheck: https://t.co/Stz0K9TKBW
BlueSky: @steveharoz.com
Joined March 2008
I've copied my tweet history over to 🦋BlueSky. Please find me there! .
1
0
0
Reminder that I rarely check twitter anymore. BlueSky is my primary social media site. BlueSky: Blog: LinkedIn:
0
1
1
Please 🥺.
BlueSky June!. Many people who have a BlueSky account still prioritize posting, reading, and asking questions on Twitter. So for the rest of June, I ask you to commit to using before the mess called X. Please retweet and tag people!. 1/.
1
0
0
Tagging some more people who I hope will deprioritize Twitter in June. @ClausWilke.@dan_p_simpson.@deevybee.@JoeHilgard.@JessicaHullman.@lonnibesancon.@MicrobiomDigest.@PhDemetri.@uri_sohn.@SmutClyde.
1
0
2
Tagging people who I hope will deprioritize Twitter in June. @ChelseaParlett .@cshperspectives.@dggoldst .@dsquintana.@EikoFried .@jamesheathers.@NicoleCRust.@RuthRosenholtz .@sTeamTraen .@stephenjwild .@tcarpenter216.@AlexKale17.
2
0
6
If you want to crosspost to get a broader reach, go for it! But I'm asking you to post to BlueSky first to break the habit of thinking of twitter as your primary or first place to go. For June, start with BlueSky. Here's a starter guide: 3/3.
docs.google.com
BlueSky for Scientists Authors: Steve Haroz and Mark Rubin URL: http://blueskyscience.steveharoz.com Verify yourself by Using your domain name as your handle It can be important, especially for...
3
0
4
Check BlueSky before Twitter. Post content to BlueSky before Twitter. Ask questions on BlueSky before Twitter. DM on BlueSky before Twitter. 2/.
1
0
3
BlueSky June!. Many people who have a BlueSky account still prioritize posting, reading, and asking questions on Twitter. So for the rest of June, I ask you to commit to using before the mess called X. Please retweet and tag people!. 1/.
2
5
12
RT @dsquintana: Just discovered that @sharoz put together a 'simple edition' of statcheck, where you can paste in text snippets that report….
0
21
0
RT @sharoz: @PhDemetri BlueSky's gotten better, and it's the closest thing to what stats twitter was. Check out the stats feed:. https://t.….
0
2
0
RT @mzloteanu: #statstab #50 (!) Simulating how replicate trial count impacts Cohen’s d effect size. Thoughts: Not ready to give up std eff….
steveharoz.com
Imagine reading two different abstracts. Both study the same effect. Both use the same methods and stimuli. Both have the same high subject count (N). One reports an effect size of d = 0.1 (p = 0.3)....
0
6
0
Long-term improvements:.* More stats education in applied fields. * Reporting standards that make errors easier to spot. * Mandatory open data+code (or an explicit reason why it can't be shared). Publication venues that don't mandate open practices don't warrant credibility. 7/7.
0
0
2
Some red flags for spotting sketchy results:.🚩 Incomplete reporting. P-values aren't enough. Look for a full APA report F(_,_)=_, p=_, 95%CI ES=_. 🚩 Unreported model. 🚩 Hidden data or code. 🚩 Claims about an analysis approach being immune from common statistical concerns. 6/.
2
0
1
False negative: Experiment design lacks sensitivity. Experiment design can go wrong too. When baselines vary, a between-subject experiment may not find a reliable effect. Here, an experiment with 200 subjects fails where a more sensitive experiment with 5 subjects succeeds. 5/
1
0
0
False negative: Failing to detect a reliable effect. Here, a within-subject experiment is analyzed as between-subject. Despite 95% of subjects showing the effect, individual baseline differences overwhelm the inappropriate analysis, which fails to detect an effect. 4/
1
0
0