Nate Bennett Profile
Nate Bennett

@naterbennett0

Followers
1,059
Following
187
Media
8
Statuses
61

Co-Founder at Xaira Therapeutics. De novo protein binder design. Former Postdoctoral Scholar at @UWproteindesign .

Seattle, WA
Joined June 2022
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Explore trending content on Musk Viewer
Pinned Tweet
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
6 months
We’re excited to share our preprint where we show, for the first time, the atomically accurate design of VHH antibodies!
16
163
643
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
1/7 Improving de novo Protein Binder Design with Deep Learning () We show that AF2 is an effective predictor of whether a de novo designed miniprotein will bind to the intended target or not.
5
74
368
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
1 year
RFdiffusion is now free and open source. We’re excited to see what cool proteins you all will diffuse!
@UWproteindesign
Institute for Protein Design
1 year
Today we're making RF Diffusion, our guided diffusion model for protein design with potential applications in medicine, vaccines & advanced materials, free to use. The software has proven much faster and more capable than prior protein design tools.
6
325
1K
0
11
82
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
Turns out RFdiffusion is incredible at designing binders to arbitrary targets. We see a 100x increase in experimental success rate over Rosetta-based binder design methods!
@DaveJuergens
David Juergens
2 years
We’re very happy to announce that our RFdiffusion manuscript is now on bioRxiv! A lot can change in a week - we’ve now tested over a thousand designs and there’s so much exciting new data! 🧵
28
273
1K
0
2
55
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
Diffusion models excel at protein design including binder design! Check out Joe’s thread to see how we made a pM binder straight off the computer!
@_JosephWatson
Joseph Watson
2 years
DALL-E’s amazing images are popping up all over the web. That software uses something called a diffusion model, which is trained to remove noise from static until a clear picture is formed. Turns out diffusion models can design proteins too!
34
529
2K
0
11
51
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
1 year
@UWproteindesign Protein binder design has never been easier and we are excited to see what you design! A big thanks to my co-lead on this paper: Brian Coventry (who is not on Twitter).
0
3
17
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
6 months
This work is a proof-of-concept and needs to be refined before it is on-par with RFdiffusion for mini binder design. I'm incredibly excited, however, about the potential of this type of technology for therapeutic design and I can't wait to see where this leads!
2
2
18
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
2/7 This paper builds on the work of Cao et al. () that presented a pipeline to computationally design miniprotein binders. The major issue with this pipeline has been the low experimental success rate of designed binders.
1
2
17
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
1 year
@UWproteindesign This method is what we use for sequence design and in silico filtering of RFdiffusion protein binder backbones! RFdiffusion is already open source and we are making this method free and open source as well:
1
4
14
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
5/7 The confidence AF2 assigns to interchain contacts between target and miniprotein (a metric we call pAE_interaction) is by-far the best predictor of whether a miniprotein will work experimentally that we have ever seen. A new RoseTTAFold (RF2) is similarly predictive to AF2.
Tweet media one
1
2
15
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
6 months
RFdiffusion is capable of designing diverse antibodies, that are truly de novo (no similarity to existing antibodies to those epitopes/in the training set). @RobertRagotte led the experimental effort, and characterised numerous VHH antibody binders to four different targets.
Tweet media one
1
4
14
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
4/7 Crucially, initializing AF2’s prev_pos variable with the Rosetta design structure helps AF2 find the correct dock more often (we call this protocol “AF2 with an initial guess”).
1
2
14
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
6 months
We wanted to know precisely how accurate these VHH designs were. @andrewjborst along with the IPD EM core solved the structure of one of these VHHs binding to Flu Hemagglutinin, and the structure is essentially exactly as designed, even in the challenging-to-model CDR H3 loop.
Tweet media one
1
3
13
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
6/7 We put this new metric to the test in a prospective experiment against 4 new targets. We found that filtering by AF2 pAE_interaction led to ~10-fold experimental success rate improvements over the previous state-of-the-art.
Tweet media one
3
1
9
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
6 months
Last year, we released RFdiffusion, which showed state-of-the-art performance across a broad range of protein design tasks. However, the design of antibodies is a particularly challenging problem because of the flexible loop-mediated interactions they make with target proteins.
1
2
9
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
6 months
We had so many amazing collaborators on this project: @dejsee , @wanderingriti , @definitelyphil , @SingerBenedikt , @SusanaVazTor , as well as many Twitter-less collaborators!
1
3
9
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
7/7 We also find that using ProteinMPNN to design miniprotein binders is ~6-fold more computationally efficient than the previous state-of-the-art design method (below). We also verify that binders designed with ProteinMPNN work experimentally.
Tweet media one
1
2
8
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
3/7 Using templating, we configure AF2 to fix the structure of the target protein in place and predict the structure and docked pose of the miniprotein binder from single-sequence. This lets us model challenging target proteins (like COVID Spike, below; AF2: Blue, CryoEM: Green).
Tweet media one
1
1
8
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
@andrewwhite01 We have tried using hallucination for designing binders! Hallucination, however, takes ~10 minutes on a GPU to make a design whereas ProteinMPNN takes ~2 seconds on a CPU. They pass the AF2 filter at similar rates so we prefer to the faster method!
2
0
6
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
6 months
Antibodies are one of the biggest therapeutic modalities, however, so we desperately want to be able to rationally design them.  @_JosephWatson and I therefore developed RFdiffusion further to extend it to the design of antibodies.
Tweet media one
1
2
5
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
Thanks Stephan for the in-depth article on RFdiffusion! This article summarizes our work really well and describes how it fits within the broader context of de novo protein design. I recommend anyone interested in RFdiffusion to read this article!
@stephanheijl
Stephan Heijl
2 years
The past month we have seen some amazing AI news 🤖. But we should be careful not to miss out on what I believe could be one of the most disruptive proteomics technologies this decade. Protein Diffusion could usher in a new Protein Design Era.
4
49
205
0
0
4
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
1 year
@sokrypton You’re a wizard, Sergey!
0
0
3
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
Very cool work showing RFdiffusion can generate very high affinity binders to many different peptides-of-interest!
@SusanaVazTor
Susana Vazquez Torres
2 years
So happy to have co-lead this project ! And so excited for this new era of protein design ! Is finally out ! @PreethamVi @definitelyphil @_JosephWatson @DaveJuergens
1
37
165
0
1
3
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
6 months
@json_yim Thanks, Jason!
0
0
2
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
1 year
Since we published the preprint of this work last year, this pipeline has been used to create a ton of new protein binders at @UWproteindesign .
1
2
1
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
@andrewwhite01 @_JosephWatson @DaveJuergens @jueseph and @sid_thesci_kid have done most of the work on hallucinating binders!
0
0
2
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
@Eyesgack We are looking into trying to learn physically what AF2 knows! To express these energies in Rosetta, though, they must be pairwise decomposable which makes it difficult
0
0
1
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
1 year
@jrobsontull We describe in the paper how we use AF2 to validate the binders in silico. Scripts to do that protocol are also publicly available!
0
0
1
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
@SassSeabass pAE_interaction is closely correlated with pLDDT of the binder! So filtering stringently on pAE_interaction is already selecting for designs that AF2 thinks will be stable as a monomer. We are very curious what AF2 is still getting wrong though...
0
0
1
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
6 months
@coledeforest Thanks, Cole!
0
0
1
@naterbennett0
Nate Bennett
2 years
@Eyesgack Thank you! Generating large datasets of successful and unsuccessful designs to train on is probably the most straightforward way to improve the success rate. A larger dataset should also allow us to better understand, physically, what makes binders work
0
0
1