Max Lugavere
@maxlugavere
Followers
90K
Following
16K
Media
2K
Statuses
23K
NYT best-selling author of Genius Foods. Longevity, nutrition science, and brain health. Subscribe to The Genius Life podcast (80m+ downloads). 👇🏼
Los Angeles, CA
Joined March 2009
We’ve never lived in a time when truth has been this accessible, this free.
5
4
90
Yes, @elonmusk, @Grokipedia is fair and accurate on the topic of the lab leak, while @Wikipedia is biased and misleading.
The goal of Grok and https://t.co/op5s4ZikGJ is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. We will never be perfect, but we shall nonetheless strive towards that goal.
17
112
741
Wikipedia is cooked.
Wikipedia editors launched an article on their greatest competitor: Grokipedia. And the article is filled with lies about the platform, describing it as a “manipulated conservative-leaning AI powered online encyclopedia” made by Elon Musk. They’re patting themselves on the back
8
4
55
I just read the current grokipedia article on the Great Barrington Declaration. It's balanced & almost entirely factually accurate (though it still has me as Stanford prof.). Wikipedia, by contrast, is biased, bordering on libelous. Thank you @elonmusk! https://t.co/KF8mocCMrn
grokipedia.com
The Great Barrington Declaration is an open letter drafted on October 4, 2020, in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, by three prominent epidemiologists—Martin Kulldorff of Harvard University, Sunetra...
296
2K
15K
Functional medicine definitely has its issues, but to make its top-line summary so damning is yet one more illustration of Wikipedia's shameful bias.
Anyone who has had a complex health issue or taken 5 mins to look at the data knows that functional medicine is not a “disproven” “form of quackery”. Score for Grokipedia. Wikipedia is doing a disservice to everyone who could be helped by the functional medicine world. I’m
2
1
50
Go search for your favorite topics. This is a really good start and, imo, almost equal to Wikipedia already on the topics covered. This will be obviously better than Wikipedia within a year…
https://t.co/op5s4ZiSwh version 0.1 is now live. Version 1.0 will be 10X better, but even at 0.1 it’s better than Wikipedia imo.
514
1K
9K
The reality is no one cares whether their encyclopedia is edited by humans or AI. They just want factual, balanced information. Wikipedia has failed at that. AI will be the obvious victor, and kudos to Grokipedia, @elonmusk and co. for stepping up to the plate.
13
16
245
It's true!
@reallyoptimized @maxlugavere No, Max doesn't hate vegans—he critiques vegan diets for potential nutrient deficiencies like B12 and omega-3s that impact brain health, based on science. His work emphasizes balanced, ancestral eating patterns over ideology. Personal choice is fine, but he prioritizes evidence
0
2
44
Compare my Wikipedia page—which has been unfairly held hostage for months by a vegan activist who simply doesn't like me—with this one on Grokipedia and the difference is night-and-day: https://t.co/lBpx4hgQZV Wikipedia is done.
grokipedia.com
Max Lugavere is an American filmmaker, health and science journalist, and New York Times bestselling author specializing in brain health and nutrition. Motivated by his mother's rapid decline from a...
19
6
140
My God, I've spent 20 minutes browsing Grokipedia and one thing is absolutely clear: Wikipedia is cooked.
16
18
337
Thank God is right. He’s done more for truth than any single individual ever has. Yes, he’s a loose cannon sometimes—he’s still human—but his contributions to society for this platform (on top of everything else) are historic.
RFK JR: “Thank God for @elonmusk. I don't think we'd have free speech in this country if it wasn't for Elon Musk, because he opened up Twitter and he allowed people to see what was actually happening.”
17
64
622
Sounds miserable.
recently stopped: - podcasts - todo lists - coffee - routines - news - planning - networking - music never been more productive
2
0
51
Interesting.
‘No Kings’ protests composed mostly of educated white women in their 40s: experts https://t.co/CSBMR48sxs
12
1
60
You can not consume “ounces” and “grams” either. Doesn’t mean they’re not effective units of measurement.
No Max you can not consume 'calories'. This is STILL physically impossible. Why can't you numbskulls get hear heads around this fact? Its not hard.
3
0
19
There are other important details here which should be obvious if you follow me… I don’t drink sugar-sweetened beverages and I minimize my intake of UPFs and prioritize whole (Genius) foods. But that should all go without saying.
0
0
10
Here’s my exact strategy. Under most circumstances, so like 90% of the year, I pay no attention to macros or calories other than protein, and I don’t track my protein, I just make sure to eat a lot of it so that it fills me up and leaves me less hungry for other stuff. That
@maxlugavere Do you follow detailed macro split for yourself? Or more so a protein goal within the calorie goal and let fat / carbs fall where they do that day ?
2
0
37
People get weirdly offended by “calories in, calories out,” but it works. You don’t need to count calories to avoid gaining weight when you build the right food environment which, in a sane world, would be the default. But pretending energy balance doesn’t matter is just denial.
36
3
122
Ridiculous.
The editors at @Nature must be living in an alternate universe to think this is going to help the credibility of science in any way. Just say no.
2
1
30