Jeff Spross
@jeffspross
Followers
6K
Following
11K
Media
124
Statuses
845
Stay-at-home dad. Failed filmmaker. Occasional guitarist. Lapsed Presbyterian. Wrote about politics and economic policy in ages long past. Sometimes still do.
Washington, DC
Joined July 2010
I wish people making this argument would realize they are also arguing against minimum wage laws, unions, and really any policy that compresses the wage distribution. You’re basically saying affordability *requires* an underclass of cheap and exploitable laborers.
If you would like to pay $30 for a pint of strawberries, $700 for someone to clean your one-bedroom apartment, and $100,000 for a new roof on your normal-sized house, then deporting all undocumented people is a policy you should support.
0
4
16
I’m having PTSD flashbacks to the original Obamacare debates, and reformocons insisting that, no, seriously, health insurance with a $50,000 annual deductible is a really good idea!
The plan is to stop subsidizing the big, fat insurance companies and give money directly to people so they … can buy coverage from the big, fat insurance companies?
2
0
3
The plan is to stop subsidizing the big, fat insurance companies and give money directly to people so they … can buy coverage from the big, fat insurance companies?
5
9
38
@oren_cass Like, I get the desire to hit Matt Yglesias or Justin Wolfers in the face with a pie. I experience the impulse myself often enough! But reading whatever they suggest and always doing the opposite does not a sound pro-worker econ strategy make.
0
0
1
@oren_cass I very much applaud the new focus on labor market tightness by populist/pro-worker/whatever conservatives! Bravo! But to think immigration restrictions are the best tool for the job is not the result of bravely unorthodox analysis. It’s the result of culture war brain poisoning.
2
0
1
One of the most telling tidbits in this whole debate is a line in this @oren_cass piece where he admits the literature on immigration’s labor market impact is “plainly inconclusive.” https://t.co/640qaGTqMz Then why are you leaning so hard on immigration restrictions as THE tool?
1
0
1
If fiscal & monetary policy is dedicated to “discipline” & “sound money,” you won’t get tight labor markets no matter how many immigrants you kick out. OTOH, dedicate those tools to full employment, and there’s no reason to think immigration can prevent labor market tightness.
1
0
2
The basic argument here is that productivity gains via technology and automation are driven by tight labor markets. Which is entirely true! The question that goes unasked is whether immigration restrictions are a particularly effective way to achieve tight labor markets.
In defense of @JDVance's pro-robot, border-hawk stance. No, immigration restrictionism is not inconsistent with being pro-automation. In fact, the former is a precondition of advancing labor-saving tech. My take. https://t.co/wDlG6SgxUM
1
0
5
This is how you do it 🍻
0
0
0
Larry Summers’ political clout finally being undone by an icky association with Jeffrey Epstein is right up there with Al Capone finally going to jail for tax evasion.
2
0
7
The book is always better!
@JcScharl @RachelToRome The musical is very different from the book (and excludes the bestial orgy)
0
0
0
Market competition is a lot like sports competition. If you don’t set the right rules, the participants will compete to win by doing all sorts of stupid shit (think flopping in soccer) that doesn’t actually serve the broader social purpose of the competition.
0
0
0
I think enforcing the Robinson-Patman Act again would be a good idea. But not because it will lead to lower prices at mom & pop stores. Rather, it makes sure stores are competing on who can offer a better shopping experience, as opposed to who can capture more market leverage.
Wright wants rural grocery consumers to subsidize the prices suburbanites enjoy at Costco or Walmart. Or, just go without groceries entirely. He also doesn’t believe laws that you, the people, enacted should be enforced. Apparently he hates consumers and democracy. Shocker.
2
0
1
I think the most useful takeaway from the Great Stadium Ticket Pricing Debate of 2025 is we need a natural experiment to sort all this shit out. Well, Mamdani and Khan can give us our natural experiment! So let’s get on with it.
0
0
1
Banks primarily rely on deposits because they’re a much cheaper source of reserves than Fed loans. But Fed loans are more expensive because policymakers want them to be more expensive, because policymakers want banks to primarily rely on deposits.
Those who think they’ve got a deeper insight into banking when they say that deposits don’t fund bank lending are actually unknowing victims of an extremely superficial understanding. The reality is that most banks depend heavily on funds their depositors supply to them. 1/2
1
0
1
Yeah, as a total interior decor philistine, someone’s gonna need to explain to me the significance of West Elm as a signifier.
1
0
1
Uhm, yes it does. A basic question here is whether a business’ chosen prices are the one-and-only equilibrium that make continued operation and growth possible. Or if other equilibria are possible once regulators start enforcing price controls.
I feel like I’m losing my mind — the fact that private businesses sometimes decide it’s good business to lower prices doesn’t bolster the case for price controls!!! What is happening?
1
0
4
Gonna have to #Actually myself here: According to a (very brief) fact finding endeavor (I asked ChatGPT) it looks like capacity utilization at NYC stadiums ranges from 90% to 95% or thereabouts.
Serious note on this question: If concession prices are limited by government, it’s conceivable that ticket prices would go *down* to make up in volume the revenue the teams can’t get in price. It’s not like stadiums are flush with attendees these days. 1/2
0
0
0