“That the EU might be allowed to defend British interests militarily, but only if it pays for the privilege; that any change in future British regulations will automatically be shadowed on the Continent.”.

“That disputes will be arbitrated by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom; that Brussels must label its goods to avoid leakage into Northern Ireland; that British fishermen should have access to EU waters.”.

.@DanielJHannan “To see how abusive the relationship is, try to picture it the other way around. Imagine a British Government insisting that trade with the EU is contingent on Brussels making financial transfers to the Treasury.”

An empty chamber. But 1.3 million have heard him via this platform. God bless @danny__kruger!.

Wonder who she will vote for.

RT @harryph: Diane Abbott back in 2008, said Mao Zedong - responsible for the deaths of 65 million Chinese by execution, imprisonment or fo….

RT @danny__kruger: I gave a speech today in an empty chamber. It’s about the need for a Christian restoration.

RT @CapX: We are in an age of radical change, with some even suggesting that the entire liberal world order is under threat. @harryph discu….

RT @JamesEsses: 🚨Even after the Supreme Court judgment, Suffolk County Council (@suffolkcc) instruct staff that:. -Self-identification is t….

“Would it not be easier for the government to dissolve the people, and elect another?”.

Zarah Sultana was gifted two tickets by Glastonbury Festival Events Ltd worth £630…Sultana taking a pop at her former colleague, Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves, for being out of touch by accepting donated gifts. Speaking in March, the MP for Coventry South made a pointed dig as.

How sincere was @HackneyAbbott's apology for her antisemitic letter to The Observer? Now asked if she has any regrets about it, she says: "No, not at all."

Every Labour Government in history has led to increased unemployment.

"But it also shattered spending illusions: support for spending cuts rose by 22 points; enthusiasm for higher spending fell by 20. Even support for boosting NHS funding dropped by 21 points. Better-informed taxpayers clearly wanted lower taxes and lower spending.".

"The results were eye-opening. Seeing their personalised summaries made people 12 percentage points more likely to back tax cuts and 5 points less likely to support tax rises.".

"Numa’s experiment gave a large sample of UK employees a personalised breakdown of their full tax liabilities — including levies like VAT, fuel duty and employer NICs — plus information on how those revenue contributions were spent.".

"A new study by the economist Kaetana Numa, published in the academic journal Public Choice, examines fiscal illusion — the theory that voters underestimate how much tax they already pay and what public services cost.".

Interesting piece from @MrRBourne in The Times on how the more aware voters are of how much tax they are paying and that the state is spending, the more they back reductions in both.

54 per cent of Labour voters agree with @KemiBadenoch on this. 33 per cent of Labour voters agree with Jeremy Corbyn and Nigel Farage. Only 13 per cent of Labour voters are with @Keir_Starmer as "don't knows".

80% of Reform UK voters agree with @KemiBadenoch. Only 12% of Reform UK voters agree with @Nigel_Farage.