fubuloubu Profile Banner
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️ Profile
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️

@fubuloubu

Followers
12K
Following
78K
Media
2K
Statuses
33K

Just a Doggie, Former hooman Got treats for days 😎 Building @ApeFramework Contributor @vyperlang, @yearnfi

(headquarters unknown)
Joined October 2019
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
4 months
Been wanting to try silverback but not sure how to get started?. Have docker installed? Run
Tweet media one
5
7
19
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
23 hours
Tweet media one
0
6
0
@grok
Grok
4 days
Join millions who have switched to Grok.
208
237
2K
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
23 hours
Alchemy suddenly changing your account's billing without telling you is fun.
0
0
5
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
1 day
Personally, my intuition here is that the less time the AI spends writing code, and the more quickly it is able to arrive at a solution (in fewer lines of code), the better the results are going to be.
0
0
2
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
1 day
Now, does this intuition still make sense when AI is coding things?. I don't think so, but we'll see.
1
0
2
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
1 day
The intuition is pretty simple: devs like writing code. So even if you are saving them time by helping them write less code, they will actually be *more* annoyed if the tool takes slightly longer to run, because that takes them out of writing code, so they don't feel productive.
1
0
2
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
1 day
One thing to keep in mind for devtools:.you are optimizing for runtime. It doesn't matter if it actually takes longer to do the development loop, if it runs even 1 second faster it will *feel* faster because time spent writing code doesn't count towards the overall experience.
1
0
6
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
2 days
RT @valkenburgh: "Merely writing code without ill intent is not a crime." . Respectfully, there is no intent element to getting first amend….
0
19
0
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
2 days
What makes this all the more hilarious is various government agencies talking past each other. Treasury: "self-custodial DeFi software without embedded surveillance is a crime".DOJ:
@katiebiber
Katie Biber
2 days
1/ For too long, crypto and open source developers in the US have been living under a cloud of doubt. That uncertainty ends today, with an emphatic statement from the DOJ that *shipping code is not a crime.*.
1
0
4
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
2 days
So in closing, keep DeFi simple (and safe!), use off-chain monitoring to complement where AML surveilance is actually needed (e.g. off-ramping funds to purchase real-world goods, payments, etc.), and stay far, far away from impeding on 1A rights to express ourselves thru software.
2
0
5
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
2 days
DeFi however is a closed system, and I am firmly against trying to integrate these sorts of complex requirements into DeFi protocols as they are complex enough already (from an engineering perspective), adds marginal benefit, and creates significant financial contagion risk.
1
0
2
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
2 days
We actually have very effective off-chain monitoring systems already, and with the use of Automation/AI (which cannot possibly be integrated on-chain) you can layer on these types of requirements for systems that require them e.g. Stablecoins (as they have off-ramp capability).
1
0
3
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
2 days
From a practical standpoint, it's just very inefficient to integrate ever-changing & complex financial monitoring requirements into immutable and difficult-to-code on-chain smart contracts. Off-chain monitoring systems are much, much easier to update and refine heuristics for.
1
0
3
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
2 days
Once these systems are compromised, the way DeFi works creates layers-upon-layers of financial instruments that, once compromised like this, create financial contagion throughout the system, encouraging the systems for financial and economic collapse to occur. It is a bad idea.
1
0
2
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
2 days
Further, there is actually a pretty strong incentive to not only obtain the honeypot of KYC information, but to take over custodian's critical signing keys, which can grant false credentials to hackers allowing them to more efficiently launder money through these systems.
1
0
2
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
2 days
It causes more hacks because it centralizes KYC information into intermediaries that, historically speaking, are very, very good at leaking user data and getting hacked themselves. Except unlike Web2 data leaks, these data leaks can cause *permanent harm* to end-users.
1
0
4
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
2 days
This is really, really bad and stupid rulemaking, and needs to have a large number of comments telling the Treasury why such rules are not only anti-innovation, but easily circumvent-able, will cause *more* (not less) hacks and thefts (empowering threat actors), & goes against 1A.
@L0laL33tz
L0la L33tz is more fun on Nostr
2 days
The Treasury is contemplating the implementation of digital identities in DeFi. This would mean that all software developers building non-custodial services could be required to implement smart contracts that facilitate identity checks before executing a transaction. This would
Tweet media one
3
2
19
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
2 days
RT @L0laL33tz: The Treasury is contemplating the implementation of digital identities in DeFi. This would mean that all software developer….
0
204
0
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
3 days
RT @kenklippenstein: The US military is creating target packages for lethal strikes on cartels in Mexico, sources tell me, aiming to be rea….
Tweet card summary image
kenklippenstein.com
Secret orders target cartels as the new terrorists
0
495
0
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
3 days
It doesn't say it anywhere, but I was as surprised as anyone when Deepseek came out and blew the US state-of-the-art out of the water. Issuing e-Yuan on a public network like Ethereum would be the equivalent for their financial sector.
@RyanSAdams
RYAN SΞAN ADAMS - rsa.eth 🦄
3 days
Deploying Yuan to Ethereum may go against CCP instincts - on the other hand - it makes perfect sense. Yuan stablecoins on a credibly neutral world ledger the U.S. can't shut down. There's SWIFT (U.S. ledger).There's CIPS (China ledger).There's Ethereum (World ledger)
Tweet media one
3
2
10
@fubuloubu
señor doggo 🏴🏴‍☠️
3 days
This is exactly what we don't want to have happen (but what is currently being advocated for in Senate's market structure bill, and default w/o any market structure bill at all).
@lex_node
_gabrielShapir0
3 days
my securities policy position is simple: . shitcoinify equity. don't equityize shitcoins . this has been my TED talk, you're welcome.
0
1
3