
Drew Bailey
@drewhalbailey
Followers
1K
Following
5K
Media
49
Statuses
2K
education, developmental psychology, research methods at UC Irvine
Irvine, CA
Joined December 2018
A clear and compelling read on IES. I hope policymakers pay attention to this. There is a very strong bipartisan case to be made for continuing to fund the development, evaluation, and syntheses of evaluations of educational programs and policies.
Helping teachers learn what works in the classroom − and what doesn’t − will get a lot harder without the Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences via @ConversationUS.
1
4
16
RT @sarahpowellphd: One of my favorite IES resources are the practice guides. There are 5 guides with the research about teaching math. Giv….
0
33
0
Our new review, with @tw_watts, @EmmaRoseHart, and April Yu, summarizing some recent work on "Learning about Development from Interventions" is published open access at Annual Review of Developmental Psychology. Comments, questions, insults welcome.
0
4
10
RT @rubenarslan: Last year, Killingsworth, Kahneman, and Mellers published a paper reporting that, for a group of unhappy people, money doe….
0
38
0
RT @MindyRosenga: Excited to share a new pre-print from myself, @EmmaRoseHart, @drewhalbailey ,@Meghan_McCorm. Ben Lovett, & @tw_watts! We….
edworkingpapers.com
Recent reviews of the educational intervention literature have noted patterns of intervention impact fadeout on cognitive skills, whereby skill trajectories between children in the intervention and...
0
2
0
RT @EmmaRoseHart: Little is known, although much is theorized, about the long-run benefits of boosting children's social-emotional skills.….
0
42
0
RT @DAlvarezVargas: Thankful for the recognition in DU's Impact Report and for my amazing team who made it all possible. First time i'm ref….
0
4
0
RT @DorsaAmir: One thing I find depressing / unintentionally funny about the replication crisis in psychology is there’s all this high-leve….
0
155
0
RT @DaveBrady72: Spending lots of time in interdisciplinary schools, it is striking how different the “cultures” are in writing and formatt….
0
7
0
RT @mariasauval: Very happy to see our paper published in the @JPubEcon! . We do not find significant reductions in maternal employment af….
0
13
0
RT @EmmaRoseHart: I am excited to share our new paper on the effects of Baby’s First Years unconditional cash transfers on maternal reports….
0
29
0
Underpowered designs and p hacking in econ should be treated as a scandal. The field has otherwise does a pretty nice job enforcing high methodological standards for the social sciences. But if a field's norms produce this pattern, they're probably the wrong norms.
6/ P-Hacking: They then manually code 150 JMPs to document the relationship between p-hacking and academic placement. JMCs with marginally significant results were more likely to secure academic jobs, especially during the job market of the COVID-19 pandemic.
1
0
4
RT @yudapearl: I am now in possession of a more accessible of --Bailey, D.H., Jung, A.J., Beltz, A.M. et al. Causal….
nature.com
Nature Human Behaviour - In this Review, Drew Bailey et al. present an accessible, non-technical overview of key challenges for causal inference in studies of human behaviour as well as...
0
3
0
RT @adeelrazi: Great collaboration with a bunch of very nice people. Outcome of our @CIFAR_News / @Foundation_JF causal inference workshop.….
0
10
0
RT @NatureHumBehav: This new Review from Drew Bailey et al. looks at key challenges for causal inference in studies of human behaviour and….
nature.com
Nature Human Behaviour - In this Review, Drew Bailey et al. present an accessible, non-technical overview of key challenges for causal inference in studies of human behaviour as well as...
0
70
0
RT @Jess_Sperber: 🚨 New paper out in Child Development! “Delay of gratification and adult outcomes: The marshmallow test does not reliably….
srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
This study extends the analytic approach conducted by Watts et al. (2018) to examine the long-term predictive validity of delay of gratification. Participants (n = 702; 83% White, 46% male) complet...
0
22
0
Heuristic: If >50% of the cost of your study goes to generating exogenous variation and then you present your analysis in a way that focuses on *other* variation, you might be self-deceiving.
3/ The study states that it found "minimal differences" in outcomes among the 3 groups. For example, the Project's website features this graph showing that housing stability for groups A & B was very similar to C at the 10-month follow-up ("timepoint 3" - dark green bar):
0
0
3