D E C E N T M O N E Y
@decentmoney2009
Followers
1K
Following
5K
Media
2K
Statuses
18K
∑_(i=0)^32 210,000 ⌊(5 × 10^9)/2^i⌋ || ABSOLUTE SCARCITY || #ChillTillAMill 😎 #npub10k0zrnsujm856xrvx7ftw2m66xsx39em620slh4eecympt5833pq97rf0x
Sol System
Joined June 2021
When we pass $100k again, let’s see if anyone is stupid enough to say that we’ll “never see it again”
0
0
0
Fighting pleb slop with pleb slop is the natural endpoint of Brandolini's law
0
0
0
Paradoxically, the fact that it’s really hard to stop people from using the blockchain for arbitrary data storage is a strong indication that it functions well as open, neutral, permissionless, censorship-resistant money
0
0
1
Didn’t work: Ineffective filters CSAM FUD Woke Core devs Alternative implementation that couldn’t beat v30 in adoption Lawfare Dead on arrival fork Scammed grannies Next up: Pressure devs out of Core
1
0
3
Given that Luke Dashjr has called many Bitcoiners scammers, liars, pedophiles (baselessly), is it then appropriate, by Luke de Wolf’s logic that: 1) Luke should not work on Core 2) And if Knots is to be held to a higher standard than Core, Luke should also step down from Knots?
I think Gloria will have to resign for Core to get any respect again in the future. Saying things like this is something you don't come back from, and I say that as someone who prefers to allow a path to redemption whenever possible.
0
0
0
I can’t think of a better gif to represent this guy.
“Yes ma’am, I just need you go to the bitcoin blockchain, find block 920,000.. what’s that?.. Okay ma’am, I need you to click on the internet explorer icon..”
0
0
3
Trickle down economics
0
0
2
This is something I wish became a Bitcoiner movement Don’t hide up in your citadel Get outside, touch grass, and walk among ancient trees you protected with your capital
1
0
4
If you ever have imposter syndrome, just remember if this guy can make it as far as he has going on podcasts, influencing Bitcoin discourse, and being a senior figure at a major Bitcoin mining pool, you can fake it till you make it too You still might be an imposter though
“Yes ma’am, I just need you go to the bitcoin blockchain, find block 920,000.. what’s that?.. Okay ma’am, I need you to click on the internet explorer icon..”
0
1
4
I will not tolerate a world in which software developers are sent to prison for crimes committed by end users. This is bullshit and I won't rest until it is corrected.
22
193
799
Luke and his groupies have failed The network of Bitcoin participants has spoken This is what Bitcoin is by the choices of its users If you don’t like it, fork off
0
0
4
Anyone checked on Justin Belcher lately?
0
0
0
You might not think it from looking at the state of Bitcoin Twitter discourse lately, but we need more of Linus’ uncompromising toxicity (i.e. principles) “STFU”
@lukedewolf @adam3us Might not be the perfect analogy, but Linus’ philosophy on Linux kernel development seems relevant here for Bitcoin protocol development “You do not break user space” https://t.co/cd90bqh5wD
0
0
1
I sometimes lament that we can’t ask Satoshi more questions about himself and how he came to develop Bitcoin
0
0
2
Good thing you deleted this @callebtc otherwise people might start worrying you might say stuff like “$IBIT is bitcoin” or “$MSTR is bitcoin” ;)
1
0
0
Luckily Bitcoin was specifically built to resist this kind of meddling We should probably thank them for testing Bitcoin’s resilience to these sorts of attacks, but it’s also tiresome
@ProofOfCash @mononautical Annual soft forks do not sound bad to me but good
0
1
3
If you want your op_return size to be 160b, just do it yourself on your own node. Why do you need to wait for Core to do it for you? 🤷🏻♂️
@adam3us @LukeDashjr @Luffy_B_Dono @foxhorticulture Everybody can now prove that they're not bad actors by finding a compromise and add back the filter (let's say 160b), stop 444. And then, together, work to find a great and elegant solution that works for both camps at consensus level to fix or improve the spam situation. Come on
0
0
1
The irony here is that it doesn’t matter*, but Knots groupies seem to think it does, so I like to keep pointing out when v30 is higher than any Knots version because it gets under their skin 🤣 *lets see if they can figure out why it doesn’t matter, and why it’s a good thing
0
0
1
“I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume.” Do we expect there to be no tx volume in 3 years time? Just when some the largest nations, banks, and multinationals are starting to come on board? Wake up, Bitcoin has already won.
In a few decades when the [mining] reward gets too small, the transaction fee will become the main compensation for nodes. I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume.
0
0
1