Super Testnet
@SuperTestnet
Followers
3K
Following
4K
Media
248
Statuses
4K
Open source dev w/ bitcoin focus | https://t.co/4WgrYhLx1c #npub1yxp7j36cfqws7yj0hkfu2mx25308u4zua6ud22zglxp98ayhh96s8c399 bc1qefhunyf8rsq77f38k07hn2e5njp0acxhlheksn
Joined June 2020
There is a reason to tolerate spam in the blockchain: ejecting it requires a large amount of hashrate, and the cost is too high But the same reason does not apply to your mempool: ejecting most of it is easy, and the cost is low
1
0
1
"The law meant to prevent drinking in the parks does not prevent drinking in the bars. Therefore, remove it!" "The ordinance meant to prevent loud music in the library does not prevent loud music in the nightclub. Therefore, remove it!"
1
0
2
"The filter meant to eject spam from your mempool does not eject spam from the blockchain. Therefore, remove it!" "The policy meant to eject students from the staff lounge does not eject them from the school. Therefore, remove it!" Same energy
1
2
11
If you want your coffee maker to stop coffee grains from entering your coffee, and it doesn't, that's a technical problem. Coffee filters help. If you want your mempool policy to stop spam from entering your mempool, and it doesn't, that's a technical problem. Spam filters help.
5
1
26
Future me: you want to run a node? Great! There are 2 main kinds: Core and Knots. The main difference between them is how they approach spam. Core takes a welcoming stance toward spam transactions, whereas Knots filters them out as much as possible. Which one do you want to run?
45
8
144
My latest invention is the Bip157 Playground. Learn what bip157 filters are, play with them, and consider using them in your next bitcoin privacy project -- all from the comfort of your web browser.
6
6
21
Yesterday, on Rearden Code's podcast, we had a productive discussion about the Spam Wars My favorite clip is this, where he concedes that filtering spam would be a good idea *if* a user wants their node to help relay txs as a public service Full episode: https://t.co/plQdDBZ3HB
5
1
16
In case this is confusing, I've written up an explainer here:
1
0
2
I've made lots of progress in my quest to make a bip157 browser wallet! Thanks @guggero for serving bip158 filters in a web-friendly way at https://t.co/LXKhtFZEMl, and thanks https://t.co/vrA8QE0deH for providing libraries that let me parse them. Most of the hard parts work now!
5
3
24
I'm very happy to say: It looks like one of the Ark teams has finally launched a publicly available wallet! https://t.co/bL7OPxj1v2
arkade.money
Your Bitcoin, supercharged. Send payments, swap assets, and lend without giving up your keys.
4
5
71
Finally, the uint8array format in javascript natively supports hex encoding
2
0
8
Join me and @SuperTestnet to talk about bitcoin in 2.5 hours! https://t.co/9VzE1bpUFq
3
8
23
This block explorer used to use a variant of Oblivious Transfer to stop the server from learning user ip addresses while still allowing them to query about the balance and tx history of any address It doesn't seem to work anymore Is there a github? Could someone relaunch it?
@notgrubles Still exists:
2
0
2
I'm on a quest to build a browser wallet based on Bip157, Compact Block Filters. And I hit my first roadblock: I can't find any servers that serve compact block filters with a web-friendly interface So I've opened an issue on electrumx. Please support it!
github.com
Electrum servers have always been designed to support bitcoin light clients, and since 2011, they've primarily done this by responding to direct queries about the balances and transaction histo...
5
1
21
The privacy section of bitcoin's white paper applies to lightspark If you avoid linking your identity to your pubkeys, then you have pseudonymous privacy It is also wise to avoid sending to the same pubkey twice, and if you do so, you still should take steps to manage cospends
2
0
7
Folks like Rearden should understand they don't get to define what your node is for You signed no agreement saying you would relay other people's transactions If you want to relay some of them and not others (e.g. spam), that's your prerogative Even if some folks don't like it
@HomoBitcoinicus @OwenKemeys @aeonBTC @DadGuy1986 @NickSzabo4 Nodes should understand that their role is to control consensus and to attempt to predict the contents of blocks. That is how it works. Full stop. Good night sir.
7
11
86
๋นํธ์ฝ์ธ ์
ํ ์ปค์คํฐ๋์ ๊ด๋ จํ ์์ฒญ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋ก์ด ์์ด๋์ด. ๋นํธ์ฝ์ธ ๋ณด์ ์๋ช
๋ ์ด์ด, B-SSL. ๋ฐฑ์ ๋ด์ฉ llm ์์ฝ. ๋ฐฑ์๋ ๊ธํ๋์ ์๋ ๊นํ๋ธ ๋งํฌ์ ์์. --- ์ด ๋ฌธ์๋ B-SSL(Bitcoin Secure Signing Layer)์ด๋ผ๋ ์๋ก์ด ๋นํธ์ฝ์ธ ๋ณด๊ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์๊ฐํ๋ ๊ธฐ์ ๋ฐฑ์์
๋๋ค. B-SSL์
The Bitcoin SSL paper is interesting. I will hopefully go on the Bitcoin Optech Podcast on Tuesday to discuss it with the author. He thinks he has a solution to the Vault problem that could give a lot of people peace of mind, and I think he is probably right. Here's why. 1/11 ๐งต
2
3
18