Daniel Manrique-Castano, PhD π¨βπ¬ππ§
@danielneuroglia
Followers
864
Following
976
Media
167
Statuses
981
Neuroscientist and Research data Curation officer passionate for #OpenScience, #reproducibility and #DataAnalysis. Writer for @TDataScience.
QuΓ©bec, Canada
Joined June 2020
In my last article for @TDataScience I show how #researchers can improve their analysis of objects or cell counts with lots of zeros in #rstats with #brms. An example based on #brain cells. #DataScientist
@PhDVoice #phdlife
#datavis
https://t.co/6NGn2KJX4m
towardsdatascience.com
An approach using hurdle and zero-inflated models with brms
0
1
5
0
0
5
The best of the best
0
0
0
I remembered my conversation with @TheIbrahimLab
0
0
1
This is a must to see for everyone implicated in research. I did not experience that in Germany but in Canada. Abuse of power in academia. #phd @PhDVoice #AcademicTwitter
https://t.co/1aLQzgceIw
1
2
2
5
1
6
0
0
1
Today, Feb 11 at 1pm EST I will be giving a presentation on sharing research data to celebrate #lovedata25 . Here the link for registration. #PhDlife #phdvoice @PhDVoice
https://t.co/vd5FejeJ5n
0
2
2
Andrew J.T. George is co-chair of the UK Committee on Research Integrity. He has been caught pants down in the most classical way (spliced and duplicated western blots). His response is typical, some mealy-mouthed corrections, some playing blind.
forbetterscience.com
βOne of the UK research systemβs strengths is having established processes that allow for this review so that we maintain an accurate and robust research record. Promoting and improving this β¦
2
6
25
A piece where I discuss some aspects of my career as a neuroscientist.
On this week's episode, I chat with @danielneuroglia, a Data Curation Officer at the Digital Research Alliance of Canada. Daniel reflects on the ups and downs of his career and the broader challenges of scientific publishing.
0
0
1
Best idea I have seen in 2025 to improve the scientific endeavor #OpenScience
0
0
1
Greate opportunity to discuss about fraudulent science.
0
0
1
Why should we end scientific journals? Here is the reason: they are companies that promote, facilitate and justify scientific fraud and embezzlement of public funds:
1
0
2
The consequences of using useless p-values for statistical inference:
Very excited to share our new preprint! π’ We investigated how often researchers misinterpret statistically nonsignificant results as the absence of an effect. Spoiler: itβs a lot (~81% of 599 articles)! Dive into our findings and their implications here: https://t.co/8RRyiJlfEI
0
0
1
My #Halloween costume. No one knew what it was but everyone was anxious and scared. #phdlife #PhD @PhDVoice #AcademicChatter #openscience
0
3
5
1
2
7
Most of these aspects will be solved if raw data were required for publication. #OpenScience
Open letter from a group of sleuths re problems with editors/papers at Scientific Reports https://t.co/OVSbtPVZAA They've published 23K papers in 2024 with APC of Β£2090, raising Β£48 million from this journal alone, so should be able to put resource into cleaning this up.
2
1
2
#phdvoice #phd #AcademicTwitter Scientists: "Our conclusions are based on data" Ohh, great show me the data. Scientists:
0
3
8
Beyond the mean: embracing uncertainty in measurements with multilevel modeling by @danielneuroglia
https://t.co/5hgXoFA7eq
#rstats
0
12
39