cphoffmann Profile Banner
Christian Pieter Hoffmann Profile
Christian Pieter Hoffmann

@cphoffmann

Followers
3K
Following
17K
Media
255
Statuses
6K

Prof @UniLeipzig @ifkmw & Institute for PolSci @crifc_de @cdp_org (Private account & personal opinions, of course.)

Joined November 2009
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@cphoffmann
Christian Pieter Hoffmann
4 years
6
14
109
@cphoffmann
Christian Pieter Hoffmann
2 days
“Why is this so important? Because it shows that the total share of votes of the right increases when there are two right-wing parties on the ballot, a classical and a radical one, as they cater to similar but not fully overlapping demographics.” 👇🏼
@JesusFerna7026
Jesús Fernández-Villaverde
5 days
Very happy to see my paper “How substitutable are the classical and radical right?” with Carlos Sanz (at the Banco de España and CEMFI) published in the Journal of Public Economics. The paper addresses a simple question: take a party of the classical right (e.g., CDU in Germany
0
0
1
@jayvanbavel
Jay Van Bavel, PhD
3 days
An adversarial collaboration on "cancel culture" reveals that a substantial number of university students support restrictions on academic debate and research on campus, including the cancellation of talks, the revocation of teaching positions, and the removal of books.
8
34
123
@smc_germany
Science Media Center Germany
11 days
#CancelCulture: Deutsche Studierende canceln laut Studie in @PNASNews eher konservative Standpunkte, da sie diese als gesellschaftlich gefährlicher wahrnehmen. Fachleute halten die Studie für robust, kritisieren aber Fragestellungen und Interpretation:
Tweet card summary image
sciencemediacenter.de
Cancel Culture: Studierende canceln laut Studie eher konservative Positionen. Forschende halten Daten für solide, kritisieren teils Fragen und Interpretation.
0
1
3
@A_Marie_sci
Antoine Marie PhD
11 days
Laypeople Have Difficulty Processing Efficiency When Assessing Environmental Policies New Open Access paper on people's judgments of environmental policies with @hugo_trad and @stricklandbrent at Behavioral Public Policy https://t.co/9t3PnGTuwE
1
6
9
@jessesmithsoc
Jesse Smith
13 days
Pretty effective review of psych research on core differences between liberals and conservatives. Nice TLDR in Table 1. That said, it’s hard to imagine an area of research at greater risk of compromise by ideological skew among the researchers. https://t.co/zTlR3AY163
Tweet card summary image
annualreviews.org
A key debate in the psychology of ideology is whether leftists and rightists are psychologically similar or different. A long-standing view holds that left-wing and right-wing people are meaningfully...
5
7
45
@cphoffmann
Christian Pieter Hoffmann
15 days
Next up: Study finds that fewer and fewer citizens trust in experts and in universities.
@Afinetheorem
Kevin A. Bryan
15 days
I highly encourage econ to not go down the road many parts of the sciences have gone down, being seen as political actors. People trust us on economic topics *because* we don't do things like this. (Also global individual level inequality has been falling straight for 35 yrs...)
0
0
0
@DG_Rand
David G. Rand @dgrand.bsky.social
15 days
Result 1b: Neutral news is shared more often than partisan news, and high-quality domains appear more frequently than low-quality ones. These plots are normalized within each platform; the dominance of high-quality news is even stronger without normalization across platforms.
1
1
3
@DG_Rand
David G. Rand @dgrand.bsky.social
15 days
🚨Out in PNAS🚨 Examining news on 7 platforms: 1)Right-leaning platforms=lower quality news 2)Echo-platforms: Right-leaning news gets more engagement on right-leaning platforms, vice-versa for left-leaning 3)Low-quality news gets more engagement EVERYWHERE https://t.co/kRzHK4YP9Q
2
12
43
@cphoffmann
Christian Pieter Hoffmann
18 days
„Hahaaaa, look, a bot that was programmed to please me actually agrees with me after I gave it a chance to learn my point of view!“ The revealed lack of AI literacy is sometimes embarrassing, sometimes alarming.
0
0
2
@cphoffmann
Christian Pieter Hoffmann
18 days
It is so strange when people post screenshots of an AI agreeing with them as if it was proof of anything other than their own worldview and their personal interactions with the AI.
1
1
4
@JoinPersuasion
Persuasion
19 days
In his latest piece in Persuasion, @danwilliamsphil defines what "highbrow misinformation" is and how to fix it. Read the full article here: https://t.co/4LfjdYsDxI
Tweet card summary image
persuasion.community
Institutions can fall prey to groupthink. That doesn’t mean they’re inherently flawed.
1
8
13
@ImHardcory
Cory Clark
20 days
1. Recent work suggests that signaling victimhood is a route to status: people excuse the bad behavior of victim signalers, defer to them, and share resources with them. In a new paper, we find that the victim signaling approach to status comes at a reputational cost.
27
135
694
@cphoffmann
Christian Pieter Hoffmann
20 days
Citizens who lose trust in established media don’t stop consuming news. They go looking for alternative sources. No analysis of „misinformation“ or the rise of influencers is complete without taking these dynamics into account.
@Reuters
Reuters
21 days
How right‑wing influencers and Trump officials work in lockstep — targeting perceived adversaries, amplifying false claims and reshaping US media. A new mainstream is here. Read @Reuters findings: https://t.co/CQlJxhxHjz @specialreports
2
1
3
@cphoffmann
Christian Pieter Hoffmann
21 days
„Results show broad support for engagement in initiatives related to environmental sustainability, well-being, and free speech but opposition to political engagement. Views on DEI are polarized“ 👇🏼
@BelotMichele
Michele Belot
22 days
The role of universities has recently come into question. In a paper published today in Science Advances, we show that the general public expects universities to do more than education and research; with some disagreement on exactly what they should do
0
0
0
@thomasjwood
Tom Wood
24 days
Given the debate about the Democratic congressional delegation's ideological movement--maybe useful to see just how far left Democratic people have shifted in the last 15 years--especially on race and economics. Data from @electionstudies CDF & 2024 timeseries
2
16
44
@danwilliamsphil
Dan Williams
25 days
I've read wild, unverified rumours that X is no longer downranking links. Here is my most recent article, 5000 words on the pathologies of our most prestigious knowledge-producing institutions and why "alternative media" is nevertheless much, much worse: https://t.co/w9VGL9yNJW
3
26
103
@MattGrossmann
Matt Grossmann
29 days
Studying social sciences & humanities makes students more left-leaning, controlling for initial views & major preference, driven by cultural views. Implies that if all students majored in business, college–noncollege ideological gap would shrink by 1/3 https://t.co/qbjxdFVPlr
92
309
1K
@acerbialberto
Alberto Acerbi
30 days
While academics and journalists mostly complain about overload, maybe the rest of people just enjoy having access to more information?
@rasmus_kleis
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen
30 days
What if people appreciate having an abundance of content and communication, more than they feel overloaded by it? Anne Schulz et al decided to have a look. Results? "We found that appreciation for abundance was about twice as common as overload". Paper: https://t.co/ChAJF02gAh
1
6
17
@cphoffmann
Christian Pieter Hoffmann
29 days
Nice illustration of the fact that surveys asking participants how often they encounter misinformation don’t tell us much about misinformation exposure without a host of follow-up questions. What do these Republicans mean when they say they see a lot of inaccurate news? 👇🏼🤷‍♂️
@pewresearch
Pew Research Center
29 days
Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say they often come across inaccurate news (48% vs. 38%). And they are also more likely to say they find it difficult to determine what's true and what’s not (56% vs. 45%).
0
0
2