SteveLaitner Profile Banner
Steven Laitner Profile
Steven Laitner

@SteveLaitner

Followers
4K
Following
20K
Media
518
Statuses
28K

General Practitioner with Public Health background. Freelance Health Consultant interested in models and systems of healthcare. Views are my own honest ones.

Saint Albans, England
Joined November 2012
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@sib313
๐’Š“๐’…‚๐’“๐’—๐’•๐’— Steve the skeptic
10 days
"Better, cheaper, faster: choose two" (sometimes called the project management triangle) is false in the NHS where much of the system is so far from being optimal that everything could improve:
Tweet card summary image
hsj.co.uk
Debates about NHS productivity wrongly assume hard trade-offs are necessary to improve the service's performance. In fact, bottom-up analysis of clinical processes shows better, faster, cheaper care...
1
3
7
@SteveLaitner
Steven Laitner
1 month
Screening - don't tell me it "Saves Lives" without a statistically significant impact on all-cause mortality. Thanks.
1
1
6
@SteveLaitner
Steven Laitner
1 month
The money is there in the NHS Itโ€™s just in the wrong places, often doing the wrong things or the right things inefficiently
@sib313
๐’Š“๐’…‚๐’“๐’—๐’•๐’— Steve the skeptic
1 month
@Kit_Yates_Maths Mismanagement, yes. But chronic underfunding is hard to argue when the NHS added nearly 25% more doctors in the last 5 years.
0
1
2
@SteveLaitner
Steven Laitner
2 months
The brave thing to do, which has been done, is not to bow to political and celebrity pressure but hold onto the evidence and use scarce public funds in the best way possible to maximise the nationโ€™s health and reduce suffering. @David_Cameron @wesstreeting
@David_Cameron
David Cameron
2 months
I am disappointed by todayโ€™s recommendation on prostate cancer screening from the National Committee. Targeted screening is a natural first step - but the recommendation today is far too targeted, not including black men or men with a family history, both high-risk groups.
0
0
2
@SteveLaitner
Steven Laitner
2 months
Surely we should only use the term โ€œLives Savedโ€ if there is a statistically significant reduction in All-Cause Mortality? @CRUK_Policy
0
0
0
@bmj_latest
The BMJ
6 months
Meaningful engagement with people with lived experience: challenging, messy, and more vital than ever. Healthcare leaders at every level must urgently implement @WHO framework on engagement, writes @maiacaryn https://t.co/7rXl4E4VTh
Tweet card summary image
bmj.com
Health and care leaders and policy makers at every level should urgently implement WHOโ€™s recent framework on engagement, write Maia Olsen, Katia de Pinho Campos, and Guy Fones Recognition that people...
2
8
29
@WeAreLantum
Lantum
7 months
Have you signed up to our lunchtime webinar with the PCNs and Federations delivering thriving services in their area? Chaired by @SteveLaitner, with panelists from NICS, BSOL ICS and Unity PCN, make sure to secure your spot today:
0
1
0
@SteveLaitner
Steven Laitner
10 months
Itโ€™s a wonderful world
0
0
3
@DSAInfo
Down's Syndrome Association
10 months
@SteveLaitner @DSWorkFit What a lovely photo of Charlotte - Happy World Down Syndrome Day to you both from everyone at the DSA. #WorldDownSyndromeDay #LotsOfSocks #ImproveOurSupportSystems #WDSD2025
0
1
6
@SteveLaitner
Steven Laitner
10 months
Stereotypes are there to be broken See the person, not the disability Could not be prouder of my wonderful daughter Charlotte @DSAInfo @DSWorkFit #WorldDownSyndromeDay
236
451
9K
@SteveLaitner
Steven Laitner
11 months
I had hoped the Polypill was by now an ex-parrot, ceased to beโ€ฆ
1
0
1
@SteveLaitner
Steven Laitner
1 year
Using AI to โ€œtakeโ€ a good โ€œhistoryโ€ from a patient and present it to a clinician in a summary single paragraph of important clinical information would be a game changer @murrayellender
@sib313
๐’Š“๐’…‚๐’“๐’—๐’•๐’— Steve the skeptic
1 year
One huge problem with using AI in the NHS is that there is no relationship at all between problems suitable for AI solutions and the big problems the NHS has. So many AI "solutions" are solving non-problems.
2
0
1
@SteveLaitner
Steven Laitner
1 year
Setting full moon with Mars alongside
0
0
1
@sib313
๐’Š“๐’…‚๐’“๐’—๐’•๐’— Steve the skeptic
1 year
5 books with critical ideas that should improve how the NHS is managed: https://t.co/247JGLzTwR (but are mostly ignored).
Tweet card summary image
hsj.co.uk
Steve Black recommends his top five books on policy and strategy for healthcare leaders
1
2
5
@easonkrish
Eason Krishnanandan
1 year
@SteveLaitner Agree. Seems quite a reductionist approach. Feeds the supplements industry and gives folk an easy win.
0
1
1
@SteveLaitner
Steven Laitner
1 year
Not convinced that continuing loads of research that increasing single dietary factor x leads to a reduction in disease y is that useful for overall public health (Today - calcium & bowel cancer; morning (not afternoon) coffee and heart disease) Holistic approaches more useful?
2
0
1
@aidehealthco
Aide Health
1 year
Aide is now registered as a UK Class I Medical Device. This means the platform is trusted, clinically validated, and more capable than ever of supporting long-term condition management. Read more about our impact here https://t.co/YJglJFbv3j
0
1
2
@TomPMarshall
Tom Marshall
1 year
@VincentGnanapr3 @alex_freeman @pash22 @SteveLaitner @hstovring @KariTikkinen @rwittmer3 @LondonProstate1 @PredictProstate I've 12% risk of prostate cancer. To decide if it's worth looking for it. I need to know: 1) likely characteristics of the hypothetical prostate cancer 2) probabilities of different outcomes with & without treatment 3) to apply my own health state valuations to the probabilities
1
1
1
@TomPMarshall
Tom Marshall
1 year
@VincentGnanapr3 @alex_freeman @pash22 @SteveLaitner @hstovring @KariTikkinen @rwittmer3 @LondonProstate1 This tool calculates my risk (predicted incidence) of prostate cancer. It tells me nothing about: a) the prognosis of the cancer (effect on life expectancy) b) the likely change QALY gain with treatment c) how QALY gain is influenced by my personal valuations of health states
1
1
1
@SteveLaitner
Steven Laitner
1 year
Itโ€™s so hard to push back against the โ€œearly diagnosis must always be betterโ€ narrative weโ€™ve been fed since we were young Screening is just a logical extension of that thinking Maybe we need to be open and honest about why the former isnโ€™t always true first ? @pash22
@TomPMarshall
Tom Marshall
1 year
Screening: do strong a priori beliefs outweigh facts? In a survey, 83% of women aged 40-49 would take part in a hypothetical mammography screening programme. This is despite being told there were no benefits & potential harms. Many disbelieved the information provided
2
0
4