@Iron_Stylus
@BigDickBarclay
So despite your thread, this is a choice. It is possible to put an attractive woman in a game, as it has been done for decades.
@tstikeman
@shesokayhere
Oh, shut up. There are no benefits to mgm. That's all horse shit. ALL OF IT. The orgins of mgm are manifold, and most of them involve some kind of sexual interference (for purity or preventing masturbation).
Nobody even bothered to "do research" on the HIV thing until the Gates
@SSazuriWasTaken
@DelusionPosting
What would you need to have in common? You could have values and core beliefs in common. That seems like a pretty big deal, and the lions share of things you'd need to have in common. What else should they have in common?
@RxRedpill
Anyone who ever things feminism has "gone too far," doesn't really understand feminism.
Feminism is, and always was, a cancer, at every level, and at any amount.
Feminism never should have been, ever, anywhere.
@AuronMacintyre
@rajm2016
That's fine. If you can't lend a shopping cart a quarter you can carry your groceries another way, and the store can be guaranteed you aren't going to leave it out somewhere.
@ArmokOf
@BigDickBarclay
@Iron_Stylus
Because we want "supermodels" in our games. The developers know it, and either choose to bend the knee to activists who want to push their politics into video games, or they are those activists. Either way, afuere!
Women can be both gritty-and-tough and beautiful at the same
@3dphile_72
@fleewickedneas
The ozone hole isn't a pocket of vacuum. It's a region where ozone is less prevalent than in the surrounding areas. If you have localized forces continuously destroying certain gases, they will become and stay depleted in those local areas.
@Wynsickle
@Alisonellis27
@immacatnow
No, you aren't. At best, you can claim coercive control over the meaning of "woman," but even then it's only at the semantic level.
@Colovion
@deplorable1971
@BrowningMachine
@RussJensen5
Or, if you're going all the way down to residential chargers, 240 volts, through another transformer.
I don't think you understand how much power is lost from the power plant to your load.
@DanyRaeArras
@Jasonmorgan35
@megynkelly
She describes her journey into being seduced into never paying. But the criticism is really towards Megyn Kelly. Kelly is the one who seems to imply that it's not really necessary to consider contribution from the woman.
@Fysix2
@ArmokOf
@BigDickBarclay
@Iron_Stylus
Correct. I like to have my expectations met when parting with my money. It all comes down to who is paying the bills. If Blackrock and Vanguard want to pay the bills, then they can make games for Blackrock and Vanguard to play. If we're paying the bills, they can make games for
@Colovion
@deplorable1971
@BrowningMachine
@RussJensen5
They use really efficient machines and sometimes just pumps and pipes.
How do you think the electrical power starts at the voltage at the alternator, steps up who knows how many times to 230,000 volts, then back down to 13,800 volts, to 4160 volts, to 480 volts?
@MenNeed2BeHeard
I think of the feminist movement and their cancerous desire to slander men. To them, everything that is masculine is "toxic masculinity," and when asked what an example of "non-toxic masculinity" would be, they don't have a good answer.
@__B_L_A_N_K_2__
@ClownWorld_
They are fine if they're aimed right. People be driving around with their brights on, though. Those people should have their lights shot out.
@o_oyass
No, feminism didn't "give women the choice," they literally took it away. Women could always work (and did always work), but feminists got the labor market saturated and now everybody has to work.
Feminism ruins everything it touches. But then, that's what it's designed to do.
@beherleader
There is no reliable way to make this determination about women. And yes, there are laws in place that prevent men from being the "head of the household" in the way you mean it.
Right now is about the worst time to try, legally speaking.
@JaneWardenGray
@daveprescott11
@RefugeCharity
No, the reason women get the most attention is because of feminists and because it's politically expedient. Women are in no more need of shelters than men are. Feminists making domestic violence shelters gendered actually results in women and little girls out in the cold.
@beherleader
Because she can change her mind at any time (which is a real thing) and nuke him from orbit. That means the authority (and don't equivocate here) isn't real.
@BladeoftheS
Anyone who says there are no benefits or mock sovereignty as a reason are the kind of people who can't survive without being a net drag on others. They're not the people you want making decisions about how your money is spent.
Let them cope and seethe.
@ItsDeboraK
The feminists who pushed for women to be in the workplace did that a long time ago. They saturated the labor market, and now nobody can afford to live without two incomes.
@alyssa_merc
What makes you think you can just follow the same playbook you hacks did 10 years ago and think it's gonna work now when it didn't work then? Nobody believes you.
@RobertDaleSmith
No. You are not.
Want to have some fun? Set the shutdown sound to Led Zeppelin's "Kashmere." Makes shutting down the PC a 9-minute ride.
@mikemayfieldlv
@David_Leavitt
They never did. These people aren't liberals. They are leftists, and they hijacked the term "liberal." Stop using it to describe them. There are actual liberals who are now politically homeless.
@TheRealSissonX
@TheFigen_
Yes, it's 100% necessary. A guideperson is the eyes of the vehicle operator who can see where the operators cannot. In an aircraft like that, the pilots basically can't see anything closer than 40 feet away. They rely on the guideperson to verify the gate is clear.
@JohnDavisJDLLM
I can tell from her hand work that she genuinely studies, but probably Wushu (which is for show). There's a lot of proficiency here, and make no mistake, if it was a fight you wouldn't be up against a choreographed sequence. But then, does she know anything else?
@men_are_human
It always is. This is just another version of "we need to make everything 'equal' for women and solve all womens' issues to completion before spending one thin dime on any men's issue (while omitting the caveat that women's issues are perpetual revolution)."
@JennyBGoodX
@WomenBeingAwful
"Whoever invites should pay" works for families and friends. Pretending like, when applied to dating, isn't a direct translation to "Men always pay. 100%, every time" is sunken-chested dishonesty.
@whatever
Rare L. Yes, they exist. No, you can't point to them because they're abstract. A nuke isn't a bearable weapon, and neither is a battlecruiser, which has been incorrectly used to prohibit their private ownership (although I think you can still own a battlecruiser). Yes, we have a
@frickinJAREN
@creation247
Women aren't getting easy. They're getting easy for the top 20% of men, and impossible for the bottom 80%. You wouldn't know this if you are a woman, though, because all you can see is that top 20%. The bottom 80% are completely invisible to you.