BITCOINALLCAPS Profile Banner
BITCOINALLCAPS Profile
BITCOINALLCAPS

@BITCOINALLCAPS

Followers
5K
Following
68K
Media
4K
Statuses
23K

https://t.co/IYbEXLDzIN & https://t.co/Ik4XkPbppV & https://t.co/VlNlAyN7nN

y² = x³ + 7 mod p
Joined October 2012
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
10 months
Happy $100k #Bitcoin, Here is every SATOSHI Episode:
5
5
25
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
34 minutes
work on binomial random walks reflected earlier in the Calculations section of the Bitcoin Whitepaper. If you liked this thread, consider checking out https://t.co/nu1dhXNAud
0
0
2
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
35 minutes
about some of his Whitepaper sources. Which may also tie in with a theory proposed by Scott Stornetta, that Satoshi was a kind of savant amateur, who could put the pieces together, but was not really an expert. More to come on that. On a finale note, it’s fun to see Feller’s...
1
0
1
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
36 minutes
looking way more professional then a professors tutorial papers, a textbook, MathWorld (Wolfram), or Wikipedia (which also used the modern Whitepaper formatting) and may also be privacy enhancing for Satoshi. Therefore, it does appear that Satoshi may have fibed a bit, (heh)...
1
0
0
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
36 minutes
for a layman to understand. So a secondary source that uses practical examples, such as a lecture or textbook could be a probable candidate here for Satoshi’s actual source for these Calculations. Furthermore, using a primary source book as the footnote has the benefit of ...
1
0
0
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
37 minutes
formulas from a secondary source that cited the W. Feller 1957 primary source. This secondary source theory, would also explain why the date for the second edition was used, instead of the third most recent 1968 edition. The Feller book is also not very approachable or easy
1
0
0
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
37 minutes
“modern stats” order. Mathematically, they’re identical — multiplication is commutative — but the stylistic ordering is a tell. It may suggest that Satoshi did not get the Poisson Distribution formulas from the Feller primary source, as cited. Rather, they may have found these..
1
0
0
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
38 minutes
In both Fellers 2nd and 3rd editions, the Poisson probability mass function is written as above. Despite this variance in formula styles between Fellers Book and the Whitepaper, they technically both mean the same thing. Though, Satoshi writes it in the more “computer science” or
1
0
0
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
39 minutes
The differences between each edition were not all that substantial either. Another unusual thing about this reference is that the books formula for The Poisson distribution does not match the format used by the Whitepaper in the Calculations section:
1
1
1
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
41 minutes
...for the Whitepaper’s final section on “Calculations” related to a 51% attack scenario. The year, 1957, used for this reference is a bit odd, since the book had a more recent 3rd edition, printed in 1968. So why did Satoshi refer to an older second edition from 1957 instead?
1
0
0
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
43 minutes
October is Bitcoin Whitepaper Month I reviewed the Whitepaper’s 8th and final Footnote so you don’t have to! Here’s what I found: The second edition, first volume, 1957 print of W. Feller’s, "An introduction to probability theory and its applications," was referenced...
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
3 months
I've skimmed through @adam3us Back's Hashcash paper, citation [6] of the Bitcoin Whitepaper, so you don't have to. Here's what I found...
1
0
2
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
2 days
hey @X please remove the ceiling cap on my follower count. thank you.
2
1
12
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
4 days
Bull Bitcoin worked perfectly for my Bitcoin buy during this flash crash dip. No down time, instant settlement via Lightning. ⚡️
@francispouliot_
FRANCIS - BULLBITCOIN.COM
4 days
Hell yeah!
1
0
1
@Pledditor
Pledditor
4 days
If you own spot bitcoin in cold storage, you're doing pretty good today If you got rekt with leverage, shitcoins or treasury companies, consider this a lesson and don't touch the stove again.
28
53
731
@spoonmvn
spoon
4 days
Bitcoin Core™ v30 release wipes $1.65 trillion from the US stock market.
16
20
263
@BITCOINALLCAPS
BITCOINALLCAPS
5 days
Live look at Sipa down by the Bitcoin ranch
0
0
2
@Beautyon_
Beautyon
6 days
Any attempt to rationalise away the dangers of changing the OP_RETURN defaults, (and then removing completely the ability to change them from the ini) by failing to mention the problem at all is extremely disingenuous. Claiming that "it's an ok tradeoff" is ridiculous and
3
18
109
@parkeralewis
Parker Lewis
6 days
I would not update to Bitcoin Core v30: 1. It was never a debate, a decision was made. 2. Users are not stakeholders 3. Devs do not understand limits of own wisdom. 4. It's not a solution to a problem. 5. Risk of unintended consequences 6. No incentive to relay large op returns!
67
329
2K
@NickSzabo4
Nick Szabo
7 days
As a (hopefully) temporary measure, run Knots. I strongly recommend not upgrading to Core v30. https://t.co/d9HFi7T59H
@NickSzabo4
Nick Szabo
13 days
@LeeroyBitcoins @phyrooo @lorandimecs @Excellion @_jonasschnelli_ @Shireh0dl @adam3us It's a very well-publicized increase in the OP_RETURN allowance that very publicly invites more non-financial data onto Bitcoin. Even though apps can already put data in other parts of Bitcoin, this increase sends a signal inviting more such data. Without adding safeguards to
150
557
2K
@nvk
DETERMINISTIC OPTIMISM 🌞
8 days
Core's OP_RETURN limit change and handling of the change.
28
64
424
@SAT0SHlNAKAM0TO
SAT0SHl
9 days
Satoshi Nakamoto registered their 1st Sourceforge account today, 17 years ago. Their username was "nakamoto2". Another developer had already taken the name "nakamoto" on Sourceforge. On Nov 9th, they used "nakamoto2" to create the bitcoin project on Sourceforge.
0
4
8