tomhyde_ Profile Banner
Tom Hyde Profile
Tom Hyde

@tomhyde_

Followers
2K
Following
37K
Media
2K
Statuses
10K

Drunk on wonder ❤️‍🔥 @conjectureinst fellow

this other Eden
Joined August 2012
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
1 year
❤️‍🔥 WONDERISM ❤️‍🔥 — my rough-sketch philosophy of Enlightenment and Romanticism, reason and feeling, science and art.
24
24
189
@ConjectureInst
Conjecture Institute
1 day
What are the two types of wonder? Watch Conjecture Institute Fellow @tomhyde_ explain:
1
2
4
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
2 years
Ecological models like these are viewed with reverence by environmentalists. They represent only famine, poverty, and murder. “Exceeding ecological limits” is a euphemism for “refusing to be eaten alive and starving to death.” Not a bad niche if you ask me 🤷🏻‍♂️
1
1
4
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
1 day
Eric Paetz (1981)
0
0
2
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
1 day
We Built The World Upstairs
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
4 months
Georgist myth. Creating land is easy. Just build a staircase. The overlying floor space is 100% new. Build a 100-story building. The football pitch above you fits on the footprint of a house. In a city-centre, 80-90% of the land is man-made. We built the world upstairs.
2
0
11
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
1 day
Criticising wealth by numbers is harmful https://t.co/pclxmfGEI8
0
1
8
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
3 days
The Enormous Fallacy “Large numbers, when they are used, should be used to inspire, not subdue.” NEW ESSAY LINKED BELOW 👇
3
2
14
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
2 days
IQ… Wealth… School… Or… he just really loved thinking. From Teller: "Johnny Von Neumann enjoyed thinking. I have come to suspect that, to most people, thinking is painful. Johnny enjoyed it. I'd even have the suspicion that he enjoyed practically nothing else. This explains
@erikphoel
Erik Hoel
3 days
"von," of course, is a title. He had governesses and advanced math tutors from a young age, and when he did finally go to regular school, they were some of the best schools of the time, ones that *coincidentally* produced a ton of other math geniuses.
0
2
23
@terrorproforma
Angus (dirtman)
3 days
I don't think anyone has internalised just how large the opportunity is out there there are many orders of magnitude more wealth to be created, we will look at living conditions today the same way we pitifully look at the impoverished pesants of the middle ages.
@culpable_mink
Space Koala
3 days
Yes, it is
15
68
888
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
2 days
You see. Even by their own standards—Elon Musk is poor.
0
1
2
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
2 days
You see. Even by their own standards—Elon Musk is poor.
0
1
2
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
2 days
On why the obsession with “one billion”, the number, is both misleading in economics and harmful in politics.
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
3 days
The Enormous Fallacy “Large numbers, when they are used, should be used to inspire, not subdue.” NEW ESSAY LINKED BELOW 👇
1
1
16
@ConjectureInst
Conjecture Institute
3 days
"The enormous fallacy is, in reality, a minor mistake. It is a simple miscalibration, a framing error resulting from a universal campaign to minimise our confidence. Large numbers, when they are used, should be used to inspire, not subdue." CI Fellow @tomhyde_ Link below 👇
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
3 days
The Enormous Fallacy “Large numbers, when they are used, should be used to inspire, not subdue.” NEW ESSAY LINKED BELOW 👇
0
2
7
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
3 days
This is, in large part, a sequel to my billionaire piece published in @merionwest
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
6 years
My latest in @merionwest. A defence of billionaires in terms of Deutschian Optimism. https://t.co/SYAPS2q5ek
0
0
4
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
3 days
The Enormous Fallacy “Large numbers, when they are used, should be used to inspire, not subdue.” NEW ESSAY LINKED BELOW 👇
3
2
14
✨👁️✴️👁️✨
9
73
424
@carnundotcom
CARNUN
3 days
More wealth has been created in the last few hundred years than has ever existed. Yet whilst we remain trapped on this planet, in these aging bodies, mired in increasingly zero-sum politics... we are poor. Dirt poor, in the cosmic scheme of things. We have so far, still, to go.
0
4
11
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
4 days
@gloopbastard
両刀使い ・ Ryou ☭ (TRANSLATION COMMS OPEN•フリー翻訳者)
5 days
can you IMAGINE the trains we would have if Pangea was a thing ohhh my god
0
0
0
@tomhyde_
Tom Hyde
4 days
Whoa. Even with current Maglev bullet trains a pole-to-pole Pangea journey would take 30-40 hours.
1
1
6
@X_ArtGallery
Art Gallery
5 days
2
126
991