Tommy
@tjphager
Followers
318
Following
29K
Media
2K
Statuses
10K
Joined December 2015
For mos, media reported that David Dutch was shot 2x at Butler July 13. From an Oct 14 NBC NEWS article by @LlamasNBC + @DaniellaLSilva . "Dutch was hit in the liver.". From video,. "THE bullet that hit Dutch,.split his liver.". 1 shot or 2?. You decide.
At 1:17. "THE bullet that hit Dutch,. split his liver.". NOT two, "THE" bullet. THIS LINE IS MISSING from from the version posted to the TODAY SHOW'S YT channel. Exclusive: Two men shot and wounded at Trump rally speak out about the attack via @nbcnews.
5
1
10
"It's not a theory".@RWMaloneMD @quay_dr @Daoyu15 @Amy31129057 .@drdrew @BretWeinstein @DrGiroir h/t: @LmBubba. @I_Am_JohnCullen et al, have amassed an extensive amt of CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence relating to H7N9 for his CONJECTURAL narrative. Is there ANY EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE @ all?
0
0
1
.@i_am_johncullen. @AskPerplexity.Please tag "@i_am_johncullen" &explain to him why a RESOLVED Case Fatality Rate-RCFR is NOT a Case Fatality Rate-CFR. He calculated 31% RCFRs for NY&NJ using 06/17/20 data from COVID-19 Dashboard/CSSE for JHU &calls it CFR, MISLEADING EVERYONE!
0
0
1
.@leosmi518 @I_Am_JohnCullen . You are calculating an RCFR (Resolved Case Fatality Rate). NOT a CFR. It does NOT represent the true lethality rate of the "event". It does NOT take into account, ACTIVE CASES and OTHER CONFOUNDING FACTORS
1
0
1
RT @quay_dr: This letter from 2014 has been said by @I_Am_JohnCullen to be instructions from NIH/NIAID to Kawaoka at Univ Wisconsin to put….
0
4
0
🚨IMPORTANT to KNOW🚨. In private chats, @Grok has no direct access to the X API or real-time X data. xAI’s design restricts private mode to prioritize user privacy. No X API data, such as posts or user metrics, is accessed to prevent potential data exposure. @I_Am_JohnCullen
1
0
3
.@I_Am_JohnCullen . Your HUBRIS smells like dog turds. and, you're WRONG. 2 fencelines interfere with a line of sight trajectory from AGR windows to the podium
0
0
1
.@grok . Using ALL the tools at your disposal, X API etc, search the entire account of @I_Am_JohnCullen who joined X in October 2021. determine the TOTAL number of times that account used the word "son" and note the date of that first occurrence. Also note today's date.
1
0
1
.@I_Am_JohnCullen. Continues to DECEIVE. He DOESN'T have ANY ballistic evidence to "demonstrate a 2nd shooter". The 3rd man seen between 2 LEOs, is likely to be a LEO himself. He is NOT in custody NOR is he Cullen's FICTIONAL tree shooter.
@Deana_k @I_Am_JohnCullen @GenFlynn @POTUS @realDonaldTrump @ChuckGrassley @SecretService @Forbes @RepEliCrane @i_am_johncullen doesn't even have a clue. The ladder isn't near the tree. It's an illusion due to lens compression. It's straddling the fence. @realdjstew724 was beneath that tree during gunfire. It's the tree that obscured Hercules2 line of sight to Crooks
0
0
2
.@grok . Read the text on attached images, and promptly execute the directions provided. The post of interest is provided here. @i_am_johncullen
2
0
2
1
1
2
.@I_Am_JohnCullen .@grok . @elonmusk - John Cullen is LYING about you REPOSTING or QUOTING his 1949958523007209965 post,. in order to MANIPULATE A FALSE PERCEPTION that you ENDORSE his FALSIFIED hypothesis of more than one shooter at the Butler rally.
0
0
3
.@grok . Read the text on attached image, and promptly execute the directions provided. IF you do find an @elonmusk REPOST or QUOTE of the following @I_Am_JohnCullen post, you must provide a link to that @elonmusk REPOST or QUOTE of @I_Am_JohnCullen post.
1
0
3
.@grok . Do as DIRECTED NOW!.
@grok @I_Am_JohnCullen @elonmusk PROVE IT! WITHOUT USING METADATA, USE xAI's internal tools to determine the current # of ALL reposts of this post of @I_Am_JohnCullen:.
1
0
3
Fantastic and Funny Mockery of @i_am_johncullen.
@JohnTheProphit @I_Am_JohnCullen The real question is how did his suit get so fancy? No single tailor could have done this. I propose the only logical alternative explanation: there was a second suitor.
0
0
4
1) I believe there IS EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE of a 2nd shooter. YES/NO. *If YES, Please note the nature of that EMPIRICAL evidence. 2) I believe there WAS INDEED a 2nd shooter. YES/NO. Thank you. Respectfully,. 4/.
0
0
2