Reviewer Number 3
@thirdreviewer
Followers
16K
Following
506
Media
73
Statuses
640
This paper is more appropriate for a speciality journal. Like, one that specializes in terrible papers.
8
210
812
it’s not impostor syndrome your work is actually bad.
1
1
34
submitting your paper to nature, only to have it desk rejected immediately
2
2
17
the personal insults i hurled at you in my review were actually “official actions” taken as a reviewer and so you are not allowed to complain about them, sorry i don’t make the rules here.
1
4
23
each @hubermanlab paper has only a 20% chance of being accepted by me, but he submits them 6 times so I have no choice by the end.
0
0
12
Does tweeting increase citations? We conducted an experiment with 110 tweeted papers and 440 controls, waited 3 years for citations to accumulate. and found no significant increase in citations.
1
3
40
the review process.
0
5
47
when Reviewer 1’s comments are just as fierce as mine
0
3
35
using this in my next review.
@mealreplacer you are trying to solve the wrong problem using the wrong methods based on a wrong model of the world derived from poor thinking and unfortunately all of your mistakes have failed to cancel out.
1
10
67
turning the review process into a discussion of my completely irrelevant work (world cup edition)
0
3
35
Happy to recommend an R&R: Reject and Re-examine your life choices.
0
2
23