The Rational Animal 🤔
@theobjectivist
Followers
833
Following
2K
Media
96
Statuses
3K
Champion of Reason, Individual Rights and Capitalism.
United States
Joined January 2025
@antixnz @hoggbylgja @SonofManwithus When you accept that this world is real and final - that existence here is not a waiting room for eternity - you grasp that your life is not a trial run. It is the performance. There are no second chances, no cosmic do-overs, no redemption in another realm. This is it. And that
1
2
17
Bernie thinks this is "fair" because he starts from the premise that your wealth belongs to the collective and you are permitted to keep what it decides you don't need. "You'd still have $2.5 billion" is not an argument for fairness. It is a looter calculating how much he can
Ok, Jamie: Let me clear things up for you. If my 5% wealth tax on billionaires was enacted you’d owe $135 million more in taxes & a family of 4 making $150,000 or less would receive a $12,000 payment. Oh, and you’d still be worth more than $2.5 billion. Seems pretty fair to me.
128
463
4K
Laissez-faire capitalism and a constitutionally limited government that protects individual rights. But that requires a critical mass of people who understand that rights derive from man's nature as a rational being. That you have the right to your own life, which means the
@theobjectivist @Falkvinge If you do nothing against wealth concentration, we’re fucked. So what is your solution, eh?
34
56
229
This perfectly captures the parasite's delusion: that wealth is static loot to be seized and redistributed. Here's what actually happens when you "repossess all their stuff": The producers will rebuild. They'll create new wealth because that's what they do. They identify
99
826
4K
You're right that rent as a percentage of income has increased. In the 1890s, rent was about 15% of income. Today it's around 27%. But here's the full picture: In 1890, families spent 41% of income on FOOD alone. Today it's under 10%. Total cost of living was crushing despite
@theobjectivist @BladeoftheS this is about housing your dumb fucking list doesnt address that
13
26
208
This is exactly the confusion @BladeoftheS and every other socialist promotes: they either don't understand capitalism, confuse it with cronyism, or willfully lie about it. "Technology changed" is not an explanation. WHY did technology advance? Because capitalism rewarded
@theobjectivist @BladeoftheS No one said technology isn't changing, he said the system of rich people ruling over and abusing everyone below them is not only still intact, but possibly even worse. Everyone who lives in capitalism knows this is true. People in 1891 could have said "be grateful" too.
5
6
17
Executive orders cannot make AI "better." They can only restrict its development and use. Innovation comes from free minds solving problems, not government mandates on "responsible use." If California's AI companies are world leaders, it's despite your regulations, not because
California is the world leader in innovation, so it's a no-brainer Californians should benefit from a government that uses the best technology available. My executive order ensures AI is used responsibly, makes state services easier to access, and protects people's data.
0
1
5
No Kings, but dictators are fine apparently. They marched against Trump holding flags of Iran, Cuba, and Venezuela. Three dictatorships. They sold copies of the Communist Manifesto and chanted "only one solution, communist revolution" in Times Square. The ideology they are
foxnews.com
Communists chanted for revolution and May Day strikes from New York to Minnesota, as the "No Kings" movement sees a growing ideological shift to more radical rhetoric
0
1
4
Someone pointed out the claim about beheading babies was false. I did some some additional fact checking, which I normally triple check, but he is correct. Correction: Israel was invaded by terrorists who massacred approximately 1,139 people including 695 civilians, committed
@BladeoftheS Great. Sounds like you finally understand the difference. One initiated force to annex territory. The other is defending itself after being invaded by terrorists who massacred 1,200 civilians, raped women, beheaded babies, and took 250 hostages. Russia invaded Ukraine
0
0
1
You have to wonder if @BladeoftheS really believes this absurdity or if he's just professionally committed to economic illiteracy at this point. **134 years ago (1891):** • Life expectancy: 47 years • No electricity, running water, or indoor plumbing for most • No antibiotics
18
34
354
The confusion you're witnessing isn't a disconnect between social media and real life. It's the inevitable consequence of a nation that has never identified why it has the right to defend itself. For 47 years, conservatives have operated on subjectivist, altruist premises. They
I’ve never seen such a disconnect between the commentary on this site and what I hear in the real world. I’ve talked to dozens of normal conservatives in real life about the Iran War and I haven’t met a single one who’s actually enthusiastically in favor of it. At best they’re
2
5
13
The world is in moral and economic freefall and it is not an accident. It is the result of centuries without a rational moral framework. Men have operated on faith, feeling, and political whim as their guides to action. The result is what you see: collapsing economies, expanding
2
4
18
On the ToS argument: Yes, Meta set a minimum age of 13. Yes, they have internal data showing younger children use the platform. But who gave the 11-year-old the device, the internet connection, and the unsupervised access? The parent. An 11-year-old cannot sign a contract. The
@theobjectivist And isn't a civil lawsuit basically the justice mechanism of a libertarian society? A jury looked at the evidence and said yeah, Meta did intend to hook kids, they studied it, and then acted on it, and now someone is saying it made my life worse and we weren't warned.
1
0
2
A jury awarded $6 million because a young woman voluntarily used a free product for years and suffered emotional consequences. The lawyer convinced them with cupcakes and Bible parables. This is the altruist inversion at work. A human being with a volitional consciousness chose
Attorney Mark Lanier moonlights as a preacher, and it shows when he’s taking on the world’s most powerful companies including, most recently, Meta Platforms and YouTube
1
1
14
Calls to “tax the rich” assume the people you choose to deal with are the problem, while the people you’re forced to deal with are the solution. The first has to earn your business. The second gets paid whether they deliver or not, and often more when they don’t, because failure
1
17
102
"Just two pennies!" she says, as if the looter's appetite has ever been satisfied by the first bite. Every tax in history started as "just a little." Income tax was 1% and temporary. Now explain to me how a woman who faked being Cherokee to get a Harvard job is the right person
Today, I'm introducing my wealth tax — and more than 50 members of Congress are joining me. It’s time for the government to start working for American families, not just the ultra-rich.
12
8
60
This article commits the central error of modern philosophy: treating consciousness as a mystery because it refuses to accept what it is. Consciousness is not a "hard problem." It is an axiom. As Rand stated: it is the faculty of perceiving that which exists. It is an attribute
From @WSJopinion: Is AI conscious? It depends what consciousness is. Philosophy and theology are now joined by machine intelligence in shining a light on what is human, writes Stephen Hawley Martin https://t.co/cAAjC4YTpT
3
2
28
I don't doubt Massie is a man of principle. The problem is that his principles are floating abstractions. He holds the right to liberty as an axiom but cannot ground it in man's nature, cannot defend it epistemologically, and cannot apply it when reality demands action. This is
If I lose, nobody’s going to stick their head up. The entire GOP will be a rubber stamp. If I win, there’ll be more people like @FmrRepMTG, @RepBoebert, & @RepNancyMace who are willing to go against the grain when it’s unambiguously the right thing to do. https://t.co/sWdap3cN9p
5
3
12
Anyone who believes a word the Iranian regime says has learned nothing from 47 years of lies, broken agreements, and dead Americans. This is a theocracy that signed the JCPOA and enriched uranium in secret. A regime that "agreed" to negotiations in February and was building
TRUMP CONFIRMED IRAN AGREED TO WHAT NOBODY ELSE COULD CONVINCE THEM TO DO: Trump reports that Iran has bent the knee and agreed to NEVER possess nuclear weapons. "They've agreed they will never have a nuclear weapon. They've agreed to that." WOW
0
0
1
Two con artists on the same page - what a surprise. Krassenstein, you ran Ponzi scheme websites until the feds raided your house and seized $450,000. Now you're a professional reply guy who gets paid per engagement. You don't have principles - you have revenue streams. Newsom
As an American Jew, I support Newsom’s comments about Israel 100%. “I’m proud to support the state of Israel. I deeply oppose Netanyahu’s leadership, his opposition to the two-state solution.” https://t.co/0WIHp3oonv
0
0
1