
Peter Schroeder
@schroeder_prs
Followers
533
Following
210
Media
5
Statuses
817
Adjunct Senior Fellow, Transatlantic Security Program, CNAS. Former Principal Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Russia and Eurasia. Views my own.
Arlington, VA
Joined November 2010
Reposting this, which seems increasingly relevant. I tried to be pretty even-handed back in January, while highlighting the risks. But, it is clear that things are breaking bad. https://t.co/YxsVEVtpz3
foreignaffairs.com
Disruption and demands for loyalty would undermine national security.
0
1
3
Fire Fickell and McIntosh immediately! Why do I even have to post this?
0
0
1
A question: do people really think that if Russia takes all four regions it claimed in 2022, the war will stop? Every winter, the same discussion reappears: that Russia is stuck, that winter will stall any major offensive, and that another mobilisation might be needed—so maybe
39
51
199
Since early 2023, the Russian military has constructed a learning ecosystem to not only adapt to war but institutionalize its combat experience. It remains a flawed organization but it is preparing for the future. My latest @ForeignAffairs
foreignaffairs.com
What the Kremlin is learning from the war in Ukraine.
21
168
482
Lenin’s dictum below, often ascribed to Putin to explain his approach, but very rarely born out by the facts. Putin halted outside Tbilisi in 2008, after Ilovaisk in 2014, and Debaltseve in 2015…and it wasn’t because he “found steel”
@shashj @schroeder_prs This still fits well within Putin's playbook: “You probe with bayonets: if you find mush, you push. If you find steel, you withdraw” (attributed to Lennin) Reaction from Europe will determine Putin's next move
1
2
5
3/ Russian meddling remains a reality in Moldova. But it has also become a convenient justification for open European backing of the incumbent — and for authorities’ own interventions in the electoral process.
1
2
11
I mean, this is a joke, right? Is it April 1st? How can people be this naive?
"You don’t do that to Donald Trump." The latest from @MarcThiessen:
0
0
1
'It is hard to see a route to Ukrainian victory without a much wider, but politically very difficult, level of conscription. Recruits would need to be dragged from civilian industries. Politicians’ sons, now often protected, would have to go"
economist.com
A report card on Ukraine 2.0
7
43
192
A lot of commentary out there about how Putin is trying to “test” NATO, to intimidate it, to divide it. Is it not possible that Putin wants NATO to shoot down a Russian aircraft? Confirmation that the war is with the West and a precursor to additional steps domestically?
1
0
1
I think this is solid analysis, @amenka, but I wonder about the implications. Does it mean that Putin will seek a permanent war, in part to avoid the pains of a shift back to a civilian economy? Or that projections on the ease of military reconstitution should be revisited?
Can Russia’s Militarized Economy Ever Return to a Civilian Model? I doubt that in a recent piece on @CarnegieEndow A painless return to the civilian model is impossible: no amount of fortune can override the laws of economics. https://t.co/GaAMNkR3oP
1
0
2
At the start of the year, when Trump first took office as president, people kept asking me: What happens when he gets disillusioned with Putin? Back then, it seemed unlikely—Trump's someone shaped by circumstances, and it's hard to picture some permanent "disillusionment" setting
45
19
77
If you think that Trump has really changed his mind on Ukraine, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
0
0
1
Play out the story. What happened then for Turkey? Russia imposed economic sanctions and Erdogan was forced to cry uncle and apologize. Don’t push some fairy tale that there were no consequences.
Estonia says Russian fighter jets were in its airspace for 12 minutes before they were politely escorted out. A Russian jet lasted a fraction of that in Turkish airspace in 2015. And somehow Russia stopped violating Turkish airspace after that.
0
0
1
A yes, more “cognitive warfare” and “reflexive control”…it’s all nonsense intended to rationalize a policy approach that doesn’t align with reality
Russia is not entitled to a sphere of influence. Russia is not destined to win in Ukraine. Negotiations are not pathways to peace but tools of war. Russia is not powerful – we are - By John Sipher https://t.co/6H49q7XAiq
#Putin @NATO @ZelenskyyUa #UkraineWar
0
0
0
So, now former officials are equating border violations by unarmed drones with truck bombings by international terrorists that killed hundreds of people... https://t.co/mAjdOWq1T7
nytimes.com
Drones in Poland and GPS jamming attributed to Russia have intensified a debate over whether the West should impose stiffer penalties for such “hybrid warfare.”
0
0
0
In a briefing on Tuesday, Pentagon officials did not present conclusive evidence that targets of the recent US military strike on a boat in the Caribbean were members of Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, per sr Dem lawmaker & 3 sources. w/ @NatashaBertrand
cnn.com
Defense Department officials briefing congressional staff on Tuesday about last week’s US military strike on a boat in the Caribbean did not present conclusive evidence that the targets of the attack...
9
99
183
I guess I’ll be the one to ask the dumb question: how do we know these are Russian Shahed drones? Has the Polish military issued a statement? Are there radar tracks available in open source? Important to establish facts first.
Rzeszow airport in Poland closed until 6 a.m. due to "unplanned military activity," as several Russian Shahed drones entered Polish airspace, with at least one heading toward Rzeszow, Ukrainian Telegram channels report. Poland scrambled fighter jets and a radar reconnaissance
0
0
1