Agarkar stan
@sandman1306
Followers
979
Following
21K
Media
889
Statuses
11K
Dev Desh ani Dharam | Kya kar loge profile padh ke | Member of @centre_hindu
Navi Mumbai, India
Joined February 2022
I am making this post if someone needs snippet of some marathi letters or records for history writing. this is for those who want to read but cant due to limitations in understanding marathi. Comment below topic of interest and will reply accordingly. pls do not ask for book pdfs.
10
2
42
Funny how Agrarian System of Mughals is supposed to be a book backed by data yet habib uses quotes by a gora to explain the conditions of raje's eco. Muh historian. There's a difference between intellectual opinion and sulking. He had to show every other ruler as bad as mughals.
Irfan Habib's brvtally honest opinion on Mughals and Marathas: MughaIs were bad and defeated by Marathas who were themselves not great.
5
7
50
RT @Indic_Chronicle: @sandman1306 @BsamaU7 @Shalivaahan . New historical fact dropped – Chattrapati Shivaji Maharajah raided Bengal !. Need….
0
6
0
RT @iitroorkee: IIT Roorkee develops the world’s first AI model to transliterate the historic Modi script into Devanagari. Led by Prof. Spa….
0
482
0
10 writers whose books I’ve read five or more of:.1. G. S. Sardesai.2. V. V. Khare.3. G. H. Khare.4. V. K. Rajwade.5. V. S. Bendrey.6. T. S. Shejwalkar.7. D. B. Parasnis.8. C. G. Vad.9. S. M. Pagdi.10. D. W. Potdar.Etc.
10 writers whose books I’ve read five or more of:. 1- Balzac.2- Hanna Mina.3- Dostoyevsky.4- Anthony Trollope.5- Emile Zola.6- Roger Martin du Gard.6- Alberto Moravia.7- Frederic Dard.8- Graham Greene.9- Lawrence Durrell.10- Sommerset Maugham.etc.
3
4
42
In a train full of Gujaratis, half of them are watching marathi reels. Was this the maharashtra mns dreamt of?.
14
11
170
Regarding his other whole thread, he is just reiterating what he has already previously claimed. I have covered that. No point in moving in circles. Does he ever wonder if it was a marathi envoy who was supposedly writing why was it in Sanskrut?.
0
1
9
Lmao he quotes sardesai for proving chh shahu mh's wife was under mughal captivity. On the other hand, an actual demands list sent from satara mentions no such women. Care to explain?. Sometimes you should leave people to their own history or you end up embarrassing yourself.
Finally, what extra I shared earlier wasnt random, it mattered to the context I was addressing. As for Shahu’s wife & even his brother are concerned, forget J. Sarkar, I’ll cite your own historian, Sardesai. Shahu ran away, leaving them behind when Aurangzeb died, remember?. 9/9
3
1
20
See i have no interest in maratha-rajput elafda, but do i have to state the obvious here? 1633?.
𝑱𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒋𝒂 𝒐𝒇 𝑲𝒖𝒕𝒄𝒉 🌙. 𝗕𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗷𝗶 𝗗𝗮𝗹 𝗝𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗷𝗮, 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗝𝗮𝗺 𝗦𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗷𝗶 𝗼𝗳 𝗡𝗮𝘄𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗿, 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗘𝗺𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗼𝗿 𝗔𝗸𝗯𝗮𝗿 𝘁𝘄𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗝𝘂𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗱𝗵 𝗶𝗻 𝟭𝟲𝟯𝟯 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗻
5
3
58
now since @jrathore_ wasnt able to prove much, he goes on to throw random things from history and even adds a fabricated claim as well to build his case. for ex. Wife of Shahu mh. Ask him the proof of it, he wont be able to find any. Not even in Jadunath sarkar's book.
0
0
9
it shows how @jrathore_ misinterpreted the whole scenario just based on a translated letter. if he would have read the original sanskrut letter, he wouldnt had to spend 1 hr of life doing snipeetjeetry.
1
0
8
Now @jrathore_ again makes the mistake of not able to differentiate translators comments with the original letter as he hasnt given a look to the latter. the part where "kshatriya Dhurandhar" is mentioned is part of the letter. see my translation below.
Now, Part 3:. 3. Here again, the messenger is described in the third person (likely by the Maratha court scribe) as a “message like ambassador” for the letter he carried to be delivered to Shahu, this time, with praises for Shahu added by the Maratha scribe. 5/n
1
0
8
As the @jrathore_ himself mentions that marwari letters are ended with date, here as well it is done by the writer ie Ajit singh or his secretary.
. Even if we observe Ajit Singh Ji’s other actual hard letter in Marwar records, it ends with the date on which it was sent, just like the section marked “End” in the post above. 4/n
1
0
11
now if you look, @jrathore_ , makes this look like a statement by a messenger but this a letter by Ajit Singh himself. Thus his argument of 3 parts is false.
… Messengers in medieval times used common rhetorical flattery as courtesy. 2. This is actual msg from AjitSingh Ji, meant to be delivered verbally. The messenger does so & nowhere does Ajit Singh Ji call Shahu even Kshatriya, let alone “Dhurandhar” & his letter ends here. 3/n
1
0
9
if you check the original sanskrut letter, it mentions none of the translators comments. pic1 - english letter.pic2 - sanskrut letter.pic3 - my translation of the letter
1
0
12
The translated english letter has 2 parts - comments by the translator and original contents of the letter. so @jrathore_ took translators comments as part of letter. the letters are supposed to be like an ambassadors/messengers and not the messenger submitting his words as msg.
1
0
13