
Tilak Stan 🟠
@peshwaspeaks
Followers
5K
Following
36K
Media
5K
Statuses
27K
प्रतिगामी महाराष्ट्र enthusiast | Student of itihasa who teaches history for a living | I speak on history & religion below👇🏻
Parshurambhumi, Bharat
Joined September 2012
RT @MulaMutha: In the Ahadnama signed between the Marathas and the Mughal ruler Ahmed Shah in 1750-51, the Mughals handed over many subahs….
0
49
0
RT @keshavadevarao: Those were never Jayappa Shinde’s last words, that tale is the fevered invention of a court flatterer in Awadh, scribbl….
0
11
0
RT @MulaMutha: In the midst of Nadir Shah’s occupation of Delhi in 1739, Bajirao Peshwa waited at Burhanpur for his army to join him after….
0
44
0
You did not read the original post. Somewhat similar claims are made by all dynasties which I've mentioned. I've also given a possible reason on why they do it, as pure continuation of Kshatriyas have said to have been vanished they try to imitate the Parshuramp type version to.
It tells me that they intentionally changed the suffix of a name to better placate socio-cultural & ritual sensibilities that they may have held. I am speaking in terms of reality not perceptions. They were Brahmans. This is reality. Their earliest inscription confirms this.
3
0
10
Only the first one stands 'Sarman' (epithet for brahmin) the rest becomes Varman (epithet for Kshatriya) what does that tell you. They shouldn't change it unless they were seeking the ritualistic Chhatri (sovereign) which is only attainable to a Kshatriya.
That is the earliest inscription. They did not "become Kshatriya", they took up arms, as Brahmans. Blood, gotra, heritage, is not changing. They were, and remained Brahmans. Your theory falls flat in face of historical evidence. A theory of fabrication has to have some basis.
1
0
9
Talagunda Inscription of Santivarman talks about his ancestor's story of brahman Mayurasarman and his preceptor Virasarman went to Kanchi and were not treated well so they turned Kshatriya and defeated pallavas to become kings. The gap between this is 100 years
Kadambas were Brahmans. They didn't claim paternal Brahman ancestry after their prominence, they claimed it in the earliest inscriptions of their dynasty. If the suggestion is that even those inscriptions are fabrications then this is purely conjectural/conspiratorial.
1
0
6
RT @fracturebaandya: Kya family hai.Baap logo ke laude kaat ke gaya.Maa kutte ke gote udane nahi deti.
0
858
0
RT @poignantPrateek: If you know any informed “dog lover”/animal rights activist in Delhi-NCR who is willing to present their side in detai….
0
5
0
RT @MarathaEpoch: The Treaty of Marwad, 1755 CE. The Rathores handed over 2,500 villages along with Ajmer to the Marathas, paid 60 lakh in….
0
52
0
RT @AjaatShatrruu: @sandman1306 The Marathas were like, our country our rules😆. On a lighter note, typical Puneri attitude. “आम्हाला कराय….
0
2
0