levell_peter Profile Banner
Peter Levell Profile
Peter Levell

@levell_peter

Followers
679
Following
304
Media
43
Statuses
296

Economist. Deputy Research Director at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (@theifs). Also affiliated with @ESCoEOrg. Views own.

Joined July 2018
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
@TheIFS
Institute for Fiscal Studies
10 months
Do tariffs work? @PJTheEconomist and @levell_peter discuss the economic consequences of tariffs, why governments use them, and whether they actually achieve their intended goals. ➡️ Listen to the podcast here:
Tweet card summary image
ifs.org.uk
We discuss the economic consequences of tariffs, why governments use them, and whether they actually achieve their intended goals.
0
5
7
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
1 year
P.S for those of a technical bent – the paper also contains a discussion of substitution bias, cost of living indices with non-homotheticities and missing goods bias!
0
0
2
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
1 year
11/ A possible reason for this is that cheaper goods are associated with lower profit margins. This means there is less scope for retailers to absorb increases in costs through lower profits, rather than higher prices for consumers.
1
0
2
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
1 year
10/ Instead, we find – looking at fresh products – that the cheapest EU imports went up more in price. Equal cost shocks lead to higher price increases for products at the cheaper end.
1
0
1
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
1 year
9/ To see if cost shocks pass through to cheaper items more generally, we also looked at another shock from the recent past. Around the Brexit referendum, the pound fell sharply against the Euro. We’d expect this to affect the costs of cheap and expensive EU imports equally.
1
0
0
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
1 year
8/ Why might this be? One explanation is that cheaper varieties tend to be associated with lower profit margins giving less scope for suppliers to absorb rising energy prices and labour costs. This would be consistent with the evidence.
1
0
0
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
1 year
7/ If we split products into different 10 levels of “quality” (assuming cheaper products are not as nice as more expensive ones), we see that products in the bottom quality rung saw price increase of 36% compared to 16% for the top quality rung.
1
0
1
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
1 year
6/ In fact, differences in spending patterns within categories entirely explain why poorer households saw higher inflation rates than the rich. Lower income households tend to buy cheaper types of bread, pasta etc. and these rose more in price in general - “cheapflation”.
1
0
1
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
1 year
5/ It turns out that most of the differences in inflation rates across households is not because of differences across categories or types, rather it is because of differences in what exact products they buy *within* categories.
1
0
0
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
1 year
4/ What’s behind this difference? It could be because different households buy different categories of goods (e.g. soft drinks), different types of products (e.g. colas) or different items (e.g. a 500 ml bottle of some brand of cola).
1
0
1
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
1 year
3/ In a break with recent history, the cost of buying the typical grocery baskets of poorer (lower spending) households also rose by more than richer households. Households in the bottom quarter of spending saw inflation rates 5.6ppt higher than those in top quarter.
1
0
1
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
1 year
2/ We look at the period September 21 to September 23 using detailed data on grocery purchases. Relative to the past, grocery price inflation was very high. There were also large differences in the inflation different households experienced according to what they bought.
1
0
0
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
1 year
1/ Food and drink prices have risen by around a third since January 2021. That hit poorer households harder, because necessities take up more of their spending. But is that the end of the story? Our new paper has a detailed look.
Tweet card summary image
ifs.org.uk
Using household scanner data for fast-moving consumer goods, we show that this was accompanied by historically high rates of inflation inequality.
2
24
33
@R_Blundell_UCL
Richard Blundell
1 year
Inequality: The IFS Deaton Review @TheIFS The whole evidence volume of the Review, with clickable links to the remarkable set of commissioned articles across the many dimensions of inequality, now published open access by OUP, follow the link at https://t.co/8yn3Hq3Fmf
3
162
311
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
2 years
Source: My own calculations from
0
0
0
@levell_peter
Peter Levell
2 years
A bit of fun with the CPI. Changes in the prices of different selected goods since 2005. Electronics and clothing 🔽. Energy and insurance🔼.
1
0
2
@markwfranks
Mark Franks
2 years
Now @EvanHD chairs a #RES2024 panel discussion with three @NuffieldFound grant holders @R_Blundell_UCL , @asvalero and @levell_peter exploring the causes of the UK's sluggish productivity performance.
0
3
7
@MrWillHaines
Will Haines
2 years
It's been some time in the making, but here is the new @TheIFS A-level resource website. It's full of content to challenge students beyond the syllabus. Take your time to explore the resources and share it with fellow Economics teachers and students. https://t.co/DifiX5Ydfi
Tweet card summary image
ifs.org.uk
3
37
43
@celsiusnews
CeLSIUS
2 years
We talk to @Aitor_IrastFadr who, with @levell_peter & @matthiasparey at the @TheIFS, has used the ONS-LS to investigate how individuals and their partners responded to rising Chinese import competition in the 2000s. https://t.co/I2BfqxN6v5
0
1
1