Legalese.com, deep-tech for law
@legalese
Followers
888
Following
217
Media
43
Statuses
705
Software is eating law. š¤
Singapore
Joined June 2016
I just published āCode is Law is Codeā
medium.com
Contracts are similar to software in many ways. But a few crucial differences motivate a whole new programming language custom-made for theā¦
3
18
26
Want to learn Alloy? Know Alloy but occasionally forget stuff? I wrote a full online reference! https://t.co/zzee9HU9E2 You can read the announcement here:
hillelwayne.com
tl;dr: online Alloy reference here. If youāve read this blog at all you probably know Iām a big fan of Alloy. Itās a simple, powerful formal method whose entire syntax fits in just two pages. You can...
5
32
119
š¤Full-time positions for CS / Complaw research engineers in Singapore ā
healthcare & benefits ā
opensource ā
use-inspired research / no academic silo ā
well-resourced research programme ā
@legaleseās @mengwong @wabisabiyo and @SgSMUSOL Details:
docs.google.com
Call for Research Scientists & Engineers in Computational Law (2020-03-29) The Centre for Computational Law (CCLAW) at the Singapore Management University invites applications to join its Computati...
1
0
9
If anyone has been curious about what exactly #RulesAsCode is, here's an explainer. Featuring work by @nardwebster @mengwong @piacandrews @OpenFisca
0
15
19
"Weāve barely entered 2020 and it looks like The Purge has begun." @TheTimeBlawg conclusion to a comprehensive round-up of the Atrium ballyhoo. https://t.co/Wj6vkoyP3O
thetimeblawg.com
Atrium, the law firm / legal tech hybrid serving the needs of startups, is pairing back its law firm operation and pivoting. Clearspire Mk2?
3
3
8
@BrigetteMetzler @piacandrews @MartinClausen8 @scott_pm @RoundTableLaw @TimdeSousa @verbman @mengwong @mattwadd Some thoughts on "a core vocab"⦠Andrew S. Tanenbaum once said: "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from."
2
1
3
@RoundTableLaw @hillelogram @lemmster @QSteenhuis @NelsonMRosario @JoshuaLenon @rightbrainlaw @worrydream @mattwadd @legalese So Iām planning a tutorial on formal verification involving temporal, epistemic, and deontic/alethic modals based on this card game. https://t.co/XnxIk2AWXw If you want to follow along, pick it up soonāand play it with friends! Should be fun @barnabemonnot
2
2
6
Reports say @atrium letting go most of its legal staff. Silicon Valley-backed startup had vowed to 'revolutionize legal services' https://t.co/JMlZOeQaX3
4
30
34
@RoundTableLaw @QSteenhuis @NelsonMRosario @JoshuaLenon @rightbrainlaw @worrydream @mattwadd @legalese We encoded the relevant regulatory rules and business process state machine into TLA+. TLA+ automatically found a scenario which violated the rules. It is possible that in the real world many such violations occur routinely, unbeknownst to companies. We found the bug!
3
8
29
@RoundTableLaw @QSteenhuis @NelsonMRosario @JoshuaLenon @rightbrainlaw @worrydream @mattwadd @legalese Hereās an old deck from 2017 showing legal applications of formal verification generally.
docs.google.com
LEGALESE.COM software is eating law @mengwong @legalese [email protected] My name is Meng and Iām here from a little startup called Legalese. Weāve raised an angel round but we are pre Series...
1
3
8
@simplyianm @kernio We have been summoned! Yes, your intuition (and @balajisās) is spot on. The technical term for what you described is a Controlled Natural Language. Attempto (and AceRules) are a good example:
en.wikipedia.org
1
1
8
@legalese @simplyianm @balajis This is really fascinating! Love hearing about new formalisms ā are there any good introductions to the topic? I can think of a couple applications of this for the static analysis of smart contracts...
1
1
0
@simplyianm @kernio @balajis Now, what underlying logics inform the language? Just as languages like Lisp and Haskell trace their power to the lambda calculus Ī», a language for law can exploit the properties of the modal calculus μ ā which gives a way to talk about deontic, temporal, and epistemic relations.
2
2
3
@simplyianm @kernio @balajis Deontics: I must, you may, he mustnāt⦠Basically RFC2119. Temporals: ā¦pay within 30 days of invoice⦠Basically LTL/CTL. Epistemics: ā¦and I know you know I know you got the invoice, because registered mail. Or blockchain. These are the building blocks of computational law.
1
2
0
Corporate law firms are essentially coding in legalese, an obfuscated programming language without a REPL to simulate outcomes. Moving all that to smart contracts over the next few decades will save billions and transform the way we create, fund, manage, and exit companies.
7
11
105
@Kiwiseabreeze @cryptoecongames @legalese For sure. Even in the symbolic AI world, you need to be explicit about the principles and norms you want to affirm. Itās not ���what worked beforeā, itās āwhat is correct and proper to us in this case?ā Tech provides the tools which you affirm or make explicit these intentions.
2
1
2
@Kiwiseabreeze @cryptoecongames @legalese Vagueness: donāt put anything I donāt like in my lunchbox (unclear, undefined, uncertain, arbitrary) Ambiguity: donāt put any yellow fruit in my lunchbox (still undefined, but parameters and criteria is less arbitrary)
0
1
5
@Kiwiseabreeze @cryptoecongames @legalese Technology just makes it harder (and imho, this is good) for lawyers to hide behind vagueness-masqueraded-as-ambiguity.
1
1
4
Last call! The European University Institute (EUI) is offering a one year (renewable) position for working with me on my CompuLaw ERC Project. Application from lawyers and computer scientists are welcome! #erc #aiandlaw
@alumnieui @ERC_Research Link:
0
27
27
Oct 28 ACM on CS & Law https://t.co/ArMUE5FiZt heads up @colarusso @GTeninbaum @DanLinna @lai @jamesondempsey this seems to be more East Coast (Law on CS, Berkman / Data & Society) than West Coast (CS on Law, CodeX / ICAIL)
computersciencelaw.org
1
3
9