@khallenbeck@mastodon.online.

Let me know if you have any trouble - I did my best full-stack dev impression but I am sure it isn't perfect :).

If you want to submit to the database you *do* need an account: .

If you don't want to make an account, you can directly access the Search function: .

>1% of all papers published in 2023 used GenAI-provided text. It will only be higher in 2024+. Traditional Peer Review is not set up to catch them. I spent the weekend making a place to flag those papers - I hope it's a useful tool for the community.

The first few levels of my upcoming game Research Rush went into open testing today! If you are on Android you can try it here: . iOS friends don't worry! The full release is coming in August with iOS support :).

Hi! Popping back on here to promote my new non-fiction book, The Estonian Spy. This is a true story, written from eyewitness interviews of a survivor of the turmoil during the 1930s-50s. Part spy thriller, part memoir. If that's your thing, check it out:.

Last year I left a fantastic job in #drugdiscovery at Genentech to start a new adventure. Why? . Too many next-gen drug modalities have purification problems that we can solve by applying drug discovery tools to #bioprocessing bottlenecks. Check it out:.

So basically @joinmastodon servers are exactly like MMO servers with crossplay enabled. Oh no am I going to end up setting one up 😅.

Watching science Twitter try to figure out Mastadon 👀😂.

I've always wanted to do mirror image directed evolution of peptide and small proteins to see what they can do. Brute force synthesizing a 100 kDa protein very cool but seems. less fun.

Whether in the form of peer review or not, that skill will remain extremely valuable precisely because there is so much bullshit grandstanding for the sake of securing funding and prestige.

One thing that won't change, even if journals do?. The value of identifying a meaningful experiment.

As a mentor of mine once said:. "Happy to do battle on any orthodoxy of order or format of submission".

In case you missed it:

Are we out here abolishing journals today??.

Rejected from all three conferences I applied to speak at 💔.

As a scientist my heart says no. There is too much nuance in well-controlled experiments. But perhaps very useful for identifying data fraud or other plaigriarism. We never got to doing the experiment (funding ran out). Hopefully someonw does it! I'd be fascinated.

We thought a lot about this @SciBaseReviews. The main idea was: Can peer review be done post-publication, formatted in a machine-readable format, then applied to future work?.

When Elsevier starts a Green Chemistry Journal:.