Trending in #Business: https://t.co/4eaMMMSS7t 1) Intellectual monopolies as a new pattern of innovation 2) When cash costs you: The pain of holding coins over banknotes 3) How Workers Become Identified with Their Workplaces 4) The Gendered Liability of Venture Novelty 5)

🚨Cool paper alert! Which communities are most likely to publicize organizational scandals? Read this paper by @APiazzaPhD, & @julien_jourdan to find out! tl;dr - Diverse communities where an organization is less embedded more often publish its scandal https://t.co/rczDunITv7

Après la stratégie (voir article: https://t.co/aqyFSn9mTX), les résultats ! A 3,5 M d'entrées (estimées), combien rapportera au producteur @PatheFilms l'exploitation en salles des Trois Mousquetaires: D'Artagnan?

Si la France a une longue tradition de cinéma populaire, elle n’a jamais vraiment réussi à répliquer la stratégie hollywoodienne du blockbuster.

Plus qu'un type de #film, le blockbuster est une #stratégie de gestion des risques. Dans cet article pour @FR_Conversation, je reviens sur ce modèle que les #producteurs de #cinéma FR n'ont jamais vraiment réussi à reproduire. https://t.co/aqyFSn9mTX @HECKnowledge @HECParis

Bel article dans Les Echos sur les Trois Mousquetaires et le pari d'un #blockbuster à la française pour lequel Stéphane Loignon m'a interviewé. Sur le sujet voir aussi: https://t.co/aN7vDIwlCZ https://t.co/v1pwO5hqTf

Trois Mousquetaires : Pourquoi les producteurs français n'ont pas, à ce jour, réussi à répliquer la stratégie hollywoodienne du blockbuster. #decryptage #strategie #cinema @HECKnowledge @HECParis https://t.co/uCFSF0a6Vl

Management PhD admission season has started in earnest. A few thoughts about what matters *besides* financial package, resources for research and obvious placement stats. 1/8

« Les salles de cinéma sont fragilisées par le discret retrait des studios hollywoodiens » Ma tribune dans @lemondefr.

Chaos @Twitter is a stark reminder that a #CEO title or ownership does not give power to effect change in organizations, says #HECprof @julien_jourdan. #LeadershipMatters #TwitterTakeover

#Métavers, à l’aube d’une nouvelle économie ? Décryptage par #HECprof @julien_jourdan dans @FR_Conversation cc @HECKnowledge https://t.co/WP1AtrUQg8 #metaverse

Dans une tribune pour @lemondefr, #HECprof @julien_jourdan explique que les universitaires pluridisciplinaires performants sont pénalisés par leurs propres pairs : "Leur accréditation peut constituer une menace pour le statu quo de la discipline."

Décryptage : Métavers, à l’aube d’une nouvelle économie ? https://t.co/agjNsKmHjF via @FR_Conversation

I should also mention the paper is freely accessible on @OrganizationSci 's website (thanks to the generosity of my co-author and friend Riccardo Fini): https://t.co/1A8cVubmKK #openaccess

Many thanks to @emollick ( https://t.co/VudJ3ZxhQR) and @florianederer ( https://t.co/1ex5lioTOC) for sharing the paper (or SSRN preprint).

But we suggest that in contests that are about admitting candidates to a closed entity, like a discipline, profession or even organization, evaluators discriminate in order to maintain the boundary (and identity) of the entity they are representing. @HECParis @ImperialBiz @unibo

We conducted this analysis using data on evaluation decisions for more than 40,000 academics. Prior work had suggested that multidisciplinary scientists, or unfocused individuals more generally, are discriminated against because evaluators (wrongly) believe they are less skilled.

...to the knowledge domain of the discipline. Interestingly, the highest performers among multidisciplinary candidates are the ones that are most penalized. Those who are brilliant are also those who may be able to bring disruption to a discipline, and hence are more penalized.

Why are multidisciplinary scientists penalized in contests that are critical for their careers? In our paper, just accepted at @OrganizationSci ( https://t.co/5IN3219kKP), we find that gatekeepers in scientific disciplines may perceive multidisciplinary scientists as threats...

Academic disciplines do a lot of gatekeeping, so academics with leas focused identities can be dinged by purists in their fields. Worse, this paper finds that (at least in Italy, the data source), high-performing boundary spanners are penalized much more than low-performing ones.