Frederik Joelving
@joelving
Followers
2K
Following
473
Media
38
Statuses
5K
Contributing editor @RetractionWatch, formerly @Reuters_Health. I welcome tips. Views are my own. Also on Bluesky: @joelving.bsky.social
Denmark
Joined May 2009
Following our two investigations in @ScienceMagazine (& , @SIMATS_Univ in India has had more than 260 papers retracted, @RetractionWatch's Avery Orrall reports
0
0
1
RT @IRWatchdog: Recently released QS Subject wise rankings make no sense. IIT Bombay and IIT Madras are ranked below Lovely Professional Un….
0
12
0
Amazing!.
In Science, researchers detail a nanoscale-resolution reconstruction of a millimeter-scale fragment of human cerebral cortex, giving an unprecedented view into the structural organization of brain tissue at the supracellular, cellular, and subcellular levels. Learn more during
0
0
0
Can’t tell if this sounds more like a spoiled 5yo or the princess and the pea. Certainly not a president of a Western country. “If you make him unhappy, he responds unhappy,” Lutnick said of Trump.
0
0
1
Real-world politics is necessarily strategic. Nonetheless, bowing one’s head and treating Trump with deference helps normalize his unacceptable and undignified behaviors. That’s a poor long-term strategy
0
0
0
RT @KarishmaPatel99: I want to make one thing clear. I left @BBCNews last year after covering Gaza for months because I could see evidence….
0
14K
0
If Trump is able to defy court orders, it means democracy in the US is broken.
Trump allies suggest defying court orders after stinging legal rebukes
0
0
0
RT @Science_Academy: Congratulations to Professor Jennifer Byrne (@JAByrneSci) from @Sydney_Uni and NSW Health Pathology who is the 2025 re….
0
12
0
And counting. @IRWatchdog.
Following our two investigations in @ScienceMagazine (& , @SIMATS_Univ in India has had more than 260 papers retracted, @RetractionWatch's Avery Orrall reports
0
0
1
Ouch.
In experiments needing animal ethics committees, “only 10 percent of the articles analyzed presented correct statistical methodology,” researchers found.
0
1
1
RT @RetractionWatch: The phrase was so strange it would have stood out even to a non-scientist. @joelving reports .
0
3
0
RT @Thatsregrettab1: I've flagged more than a dozen papers on PubPeer by an Editor-in-Charge of a @tandfonline journal *in their own journa….
0
4
0
RT @RetractionWatch: “We will not retract published articles on request by an author on the basis that they contain so-called banned words,….
0
28
0
RT @jasonhickel: This is extremely concerning. The correct response is: (a) class-action lawsuits against the major plastic producers, and….
0
2K
0
RT @IRWatchdog: NAAC has been embroiled in controversies. Another case of massive corruption happening in NAAC. Institute in question is KL….
0
17
0
RT @Graham_Kendall: In my view this is an important article that everybody who publishes in the scientific literature should read. It's wri….
0
8
0
RT @RetractionWatch: Very happy to see that the Cochrane Library @cochranecollab is now using the Retraction Watch Database to flag retract….
0
17
0
Scientific fraud is a growing problem. “You can’t just read an abstract and have any faith in it. I kind of assume everything’s wrong,” a scientist and journal editor told me. Read our deep dive for @ConversationUS
2
6
10