I’m starting to believe that there is no simulation. There is no creator of any kind. Existence has its own energy. It’s completely self-contained. It’s the only thing that is truly self contained, without a start or an end in time or space. If you believe in simulation theory,

To summarize: 1. Existence exists (undeniable). Nothing exists outside it (logically necessary) 2. Therefore it’s boundless/unconstrained 3. Therefore all possibilities manifest (avoids selection problem) 4. Therefore our reality is one of infinite configurations (explains

@jasondebolt Looks like you reached the same conclusion as we the objectivists. Your words strike at the root of truth: existence exists. There is no deeper axiom, no prior cause, no “beyond.” To demand an explanation for existence itself is to demand a cause for causality, a context for all

Correction, our observable universe is 93 billion light years wide. The radius in any direction from us is 46 billion light years.

I feel like Starship would’ve been developed 100 years from now, but almost entirely by AI. But it was developed by humans, today, without AI. Crazy. Starship could just be the pinnacle of pre-AI human engineering development. Just imagine how much Starship other and SpaceX

Original post.

Post 2 of “There is No Simulation” After my original “I’m starting to believe that there is no simulation" post went viral a few days ago, I thought I'd write a followup post covering what I think existence really is, why existence may have zero rules or constraints (allowing

Great thread by Jason 🤯 “We could observe a region a trillion times bigger and still only see 0% of the total.”

This is supported by analyzing the relationship between redshift (how much light has stretched with the expansion of the universe) from distant objects with their brightness. It’s a flat geometry relationship rather than a spherical or “saddle” relationship, suggesting that space

This is likely true if we’re in a simulation. I’ve always believed in lazy rendering when I believed in a creator/simulation theory where the creator was interested in observing humans. I used lazy rendering as a front end software engineer, so I understand why it makes sense in

True, but China has a LOT of existing factory lines with skilled human workers that can generate huge datasets used to accelerate AI training for humanoid robots. Tesla should partner with other cheap labor countries with existing factory lines in SE Asia to gather as much of

Most cosmologists favor models where the universe (not just the observable universe) is spatially infinite—meaning it has no edge or boundary and extends forever in all directions. Or it could also be like the surface of a sphere (unbounded but spatially finite).

Elon and Tesla are basically going to “one shot” American Manufacturing back into glory with Optimus. It will be the turning point that reverses America’s manufacturing decline. Cheap robotic labor will replace cheap human labor. Manufacturing cost reduction will increasingly

I’ve done things a million times dumber than this lol. Actually this kind a behavior was a daily thing for me in childhood.

The observable universe is literally 0% of the spatially infinite and unbounded universe. When cosmologists talk about the universe, they are only discussing our little slice of the observable part. We know jack sh*t about the other 100% of existence. Zero. Bagel. Nothing. And

Ancient celestial spheres were deeply mathematical. These intricate mathematical models —some where physical, highly ornate globe like devices— were actually genuinely predictive and useful. But all these mathematical models made one fatal assumption: that Earth was the center

👏🏻

https://t.co/KJXQ9KFwAq

https://t.co/U3EhAAbJeJ