Explore tweets tagged as #eplnd
@JGomezRivas
Juan Gรณmez Rivas
11 months
External validation of nomograms for predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer patients with negative PSMA PET-CT. What did we find? The Briganti 2023 nomogram is the most accurate! ๐Ÿ“Šโœ… ๐Ÿ” Why does it matter? Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is the
4
49
131
@JGomezRivas
Juan Gรณmez Rivas
9 months
Smarter staging in prostate cancer? ๐Ÿ™‹๐Ÿผโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ™‹๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ™‹๐Ÿพโ€โ™‚๏ธIn patients with intermediate/high-risk prostate cancer and negative PSMA PET (miN0), extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) remains a clinical dilemma. ๐Ÿ” This multi-institutional study (n = 282) externally validated five
1
23
61
@soares_uro
Ricardo Soares
3 years
Performance of PSMA PET/CT on initial diagnosis of prostate cancer: - significantly better than CT + Bone scan - still has false negatives (do ePLND on miN0?) - need more data on how to treat cN0 miN1 patients @JuddMoul #AUA23
0
4
21
@nataliagandur
Dra. Marรญa Natalia Gandur Quiroga
20 hours
๐Ÿ’ซ๐ŸŒŸ๐Ÿ” Risk calculators transforming surgical decision-making in #ProstateCancer๐ŸŒŸ๐Ÿ’ซ A 20-year analysis (7,371 pts) from a high-volume center shows that implementing Briganti-based nomograms sharply reduced ePLND rates without losing accuracy in detecting pN1 disease โ€” and with
@APCCC_Lugano
Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference
1 day
Impact of Implementation of Risk Calculators for the Selection of Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Candidates: 20-year Experience from a Tertiary Referral Centre https://t.co/950fRWwy2Z This study assessed whether implementing preoperative lymph node invasion risk
0
1
4
@mdstifelman
Michael Stifelman
1 year
Alvin Goh - hotspots to avoid during cystectomy EPLND
0
0
7
@LoebStacy
Stacy Loeb, MD
2 years
PSMA has 80-90% NPV but poor sensitivity for pelvic lymph nodes - cannot replace staging extended PLND. Plus new data that ePLND reduces distant metastases -Jochen Walz #apccc24
1
39
72
@soares_uro
Ricardo Soares
3 years
Surgery (with ePLND) may be enough in pN1 prostate cancer @SBoorjian #AUA23
0
5
15
@jitenjaipuria
Dr Jiten Jaipuria
2 years
The pleasure of immediate post op urine color for a retzius spare RALP with bilateral EPLND :) Nothing beats continence and outcomes when bladder hangs on the top! Now just waiting for it to turn red after Enoxaparin :(
1
1
4
@UroDocAsh
Ashish M. Kamat, MD, MBBS
2 years
@joanfundi Fig. 1 โ€“ PLND templates: (A) PLND recommended for bladder and prostate cancer inclusive of the obturator fossa, external iliac, and internal iliac nodes. This is referred to as standard PLND for bladder cancer and extended PLND by EAU guidelines for prostate cancer. (B) An ePLND
1
4
16
@DabenDawam
Daben Dawam
2 years
#EAU2024 ePLND reduces distant metastases but no effect on BCR
0
0
1
@RKSayyid
Rashid K. Sayyid
3 years
PSMA-PET/CT for staging ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡นhigh risk PCa patients patients (n=207) ๐ŸšฉN1: 17%; M1a-c: 14% ๐ŸšฉMajor tx change: 11% (RP: 149 to 131, XRT: 17 to 14) ๐ŸšฉMinor tx change: 2% ๐Ÿšฉ20/29 miM1 patients underwent RP + ePLND--> 80% BCR-free post-RP. @urotoday #EAU23
0
10
19
@AlexHermen
Alex Hermen
2 years
Retrospective study of ๐Ÿ‘ฅ 542 RARP ยฑ ePLND performed by 6 surgeons using #DaVinci or #HUGORAS robots. ๐Ÿง the association between robotic systems and surgical outcomes. ๐Ÿค– 378 (70%) #DaVinci ๐Ÿฆพ 164 (30%) #HUGORAS Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿป
1
1
2
@EUplatinum
European Urology
6 months
๐Ÿšจ NEW #PlatinumOpinion in European Urology by M. J. Roberts, @GGandaglia et al : ๐Ÿ’ก Is extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) still justified in prostate cancer? ๐Ÿ“‰ No oncologic benefit in RCTs โš ๏ธ Up to 20% complication rate ๐Ÿงฌ PSMA PET reshapes staging ๐Ÿ”„ 2024 EAU
1
38
94
@CleClinicUroRes
Cleveland Clinic Urology Residency Program
2 years
Another excellent day with our Higgins visiting professor @SBoorjian! Prostate cancer highlights: do the RALP, do the ePLND, improve patient care, and DONโ€™T always debate with our radiation oncology friends! ๐Ÿ˜‰ So grateful to Dr. Boorjian for offering us his time and expertise!
1
2
34
@drchandrakant_m
Chandrakant Munjewar
1 year
Localised Ca Prostate - High Risk Acinar Adeno GS 3+4 PSA 23.7 Lap RP + B/L EPLND Post op no major complications Good Uroflow, Mild SUI HPE - All Margins clear @AIIMSNagpur
0
0
17
@TylerSbrt
Tyler Seibert MD PhD
2 years
Generally a fan of #EAU #ESTRO etc guidelines. But curious why focal RT boost of tumor gets โ€œweakโ€ rating and ePLND gets โ€œstrongโ€ ๐Ÿค” Only one of these has phase 3 RCT evidence of โฌ‡๏ธ recurrence, โฌ†๏ธnodal/distant MFS, w/o toxicity increase. Reconsider for 2025? @ESTRO_RT @Uroweb
2
6
24
@LoebStacy
Stacy Loeb, MD
2 years
Interesting voting results from #apccc24 consensus panel on whether ePLND should still be done with negative PSMA PET for unfavorable intermediate, high and very high risk #ProstateCancer
0
14
26
@tbivala1
Trinity J. Bivalacqua
3 years
Honored to discuss @ASCO (pinch hitting for @UroDocAsh ) S1011 trial results demonstrating NO DFS/OS for EPLND @slernerbcmedu1 concludes that SLND is now standard of care for T2-T4N0 patients undergoing RC. >LN counts, >morbidity. Predominantly T2 cohort with 57%NAC!
3
18
95
@nataliagandur
Dra. Marรญa Natalia Gandur Quiroga
2 years
๐Ÿ’ซ๐ŸŒŸ Highlights from #EAU24 Day 3! ๐ŸŒŸ๐Ÿ’ซ @OncoAlert https://t.co/gryMn9TyRu ๐Ÿš€ PCa Game Changers: Debate on therapeutic benefits of ePLND vs. limited dissection. Prof. Boormans & Prof. Rassweiler share insights! ๐ŸŽฅ Must-watch webcasts: Dive into the efficacy of prostate
1
5
11