How many times does this have to be said?
Women/girls don’t need encouragement to pursue careers in science. They need not to be forced out by systemic biases and policies that promote men’s success over women's.
Can all-girls STEM camps be part of the answer to encourage more women to pursue science, technology, engineering, and math careers? The latest from
@ScienceInsider
explores the effectiveness of such camps for promoting and supporting
#womeninSTEM
Almost exactly 6 years ago, I learned that my Dean rejected my tenure case. I appealed and won. Today I learned the (new) Dean just approved my promotion to Full. My brain is having a moment.
After 8 years of applying, a negative tenure decision because I didn't have one, appealing my tenure decision and winning, and a bunch more applying....I GOT AN R01!!!!
My rule for rejections is that I get one day to sulk/eat/shop/drink etc, no questions asked. Then the next day it’s back to work. I think giving yourself permission to indulge in your feelings fully (but on a limited time scale) is important and healthy.
“The gender gap in winning grants is about 7 percent.”
“Young male PIs were found to be just as sexist as their older male peers.”
This essay has ALL the receipts you need when someone says there’s no sexism in STEM anymore.
The myth that girls & women just don’t “like" science is part of the problem and works against the purported goal of gender balance in scientific careers.
If you will forgive me a little non-humble bragging: my student evals this semester for my 70 person upper-level lecture class (taught via zoom) were AMAZING. I thought a thread on what they really seemed to appreciate migh be of use to folks teaching online in the spring. 1/n
Unanimous vote from my dept for promotion to Full!! I was given the summary report, which contained anonymized snippets from the external letters and all I can say is 😭😭😭 THANK YOU (if you're on here) for taking the time to write these, such a great confidence boost.
OMG you guys. We noticed a couple of weeks ago that a female praying mantis had taken up residence in our window box, and it looks like today she got her man. I have never seen this up close and in person, it is amazing!!
I am honestly blown away that there is even a conversation to be had about whether to send people to lab when your city has curfew. The answer is obviously no. If your trainees believe you value their productivity over their lives, you should not be a PI.
"Because you tried really hard for a really long time."
Anyone from way back science Twitter remember who made this? It came up in my fb memories and is so brilliant I think it needs another day in the sun.
What being a PI is like: feeling excited that you finally checked enough admin stuff off your to-do list that at 3:30 you can start working on a paper.
🤬🤬🤬 seeing “this study is in males, but they will do it in females next.” Is a replication study going to make it into Nature Communications? PTSD is 2x as prevalent in women as in men. If you frame your research as relevant to PTSD, do it in both sexes (best) or females FIRST
A note for
#NSFGRFP
news-getters today. When I was a grad student, I didn’t get the GRFP (or Honorable Mention), and my PO for my very poorly scored F31 told me I probably shouldn’t be a scientist. Now I have tenure. The end!
I so appreciate this honest response from
@bjmarlin
in her
@Brain_Facts_org
interview (last RT). Basic neuroscientists are constantly pushed to tie their findings directly to humans and (especially when it comes to
#SABV
) it’s often just not that simple.
We need to change the culture in rodent research. Experiments in females are not a side project. They are not follow-up studies. They are not something you pawn off on your 3rd favorite grad student. They are as valuable to public health as those in males (in some cases more).
At first I was mad at my data bc it wasn't telling me what I thought it would. But then I thought about it a little more and it actually makes more sense than my original hypothesis and is a way cooler story and now I am PUMPED to write this grant!
My office is finally done! I love it so much. Here are two shots in opposite directions plus a parallel “before” shot. A few details in following tweets.
If you’re worried about variability, someone has already done the work for you, here. Data from male mice and male rats are just as variable as that from females.
“Quality” does not only mean Cell/Nature/Science. Refusing to publish scientifically sound data because it isn’t glam-worthy is an unethical use of taxpayer $$ and unfair to your trainees, who are ALSO people with goals and lives and careers.
Deep sigh.
This sets up a totally wrong narrative. PIs are not servants to the career ambitions of trainees but people with goals and lives and careers. It's part of our jobs to maintain output quality.
So ask yourself why people get stuck SPECIFICALLY on the idea that hormones matter so much for females and not males?
Ask yourself whether a part of you sees the male brain as “standard,” and the female brain as some sort of altered version of that?
I had a real moment of clarity talking to a program officer today. I realized that after six years of unfunded NIH grants, I've become so beat down by nit-picky comments in my summary statements that I've been afraid to write about any kind of big picture vision.
Dropped a "Eet iz wahfer thin" reference at dinner with a bunch of grad students tonight and the only person who got it was the waiter 😭😫😭😫😭
This is CLASSIC CINEMA, millennials! Monty Python is canon. Educate yourselves.
If I am 80 and decide my career needs another chapter, you all have my permission to tie me to a poolside chaise lounge and force feed me Aperol Spritzes until I come to my senses.
Worried about the estrous cycle for your Oct
#NIH
submission? Say this: “This proposal does not test hypotheses regarding the influence of ovarian hormones , and therefore we will not be monitoring the estrous cycle in our female animals.” cite doi: 10.1126/science.aaw7570
We wouldn't need "5 co-first author" papers if the bar for high profile publishing hadn't climbed to 3 R01s worth of work across multiple labs, and/or such papers weren't viewed as necessary for getting R1 faculty jobs (they're not).
I hear this complaint a lot, but IMO words like these can also help with the pace and cadence of the writing. All you're really doing is asking the reader to pause for a half-second and pay a tiny bit more attention to what comes next.
@stephenfloor
'Remarkably', 'interestingly', 'surprisingly' and similar adverbs are very often used with the aim of providing emphasis, but their actual function is to persuade rather than to convey information. If the data are indeed remarkable, readers will not need prompting to believe so.
Yay, paper accepted! This paper was originally submitted just before Christmas and has now officially lapped the one we submitted in September and resubmitted a month ago.
Today I had to book a plane ticket on the phone, and instead of putting me on hold while everything went through, the representative talked to me about his fountain pen collection. His joy was so earnest and pure and totally made my day.
I want to reiterate that this thread does NOT say that hormone research isn’t important - it is immensely so. The point is that hormones are NO MORE important to females than to males. So claiming that studying females suddenly necessitates the study of hormones is biased.
Male variability is by and large shrugged off as normal, but all the pearl clutching from people with no neuroendocrine background about how we couldn’t possibly know anything about the female brain unless we have a detailed readout of E2 levels is SEXIST.
There obviously are people who just fly in and out to give a talk at conferences, but TBH looking back, the most important part of my conference experiences as a jr scientist was building my network of *other* jr scientists, not meeting bigwigs.
My lab sac'd the very last of our rats yesterday and it is quite a gutting feeling to know the lights are truly out. For the foreseeable future this account is only cute animals, food, gardening, and other sources of sanity.
#stress2018
"when I started my lab, I decided to do every experiment in both males and females, so that way my students would never know there was any other way to do it." -
@RCBagot
👏👏👏👏
"Our findings argue for the inclusion of both sexes in experiments querying behavior and support the perspective that females—rather than males—should be the default sex used in studies of exploratory behavior in circumstances in which both sexes cannot be tested." 🔥
Female mice are studied less than males in part because of a belief held by some that the estrous cycle makes all female mouse behavior more variable. But is this true? Check out our latest, led by
@danarubilevy
in collab with
@shanskylab
!
Anyone else playing music for their students as they enter the zoom class? I feel like this is my chance to be the college radio DJ I always wanted to be.
I have eaten
the leftover Halloween candy
that I brought in
for the lab
and which
my students were probably
hoping
to snack on
Forgive me
I am delirious
so jet-lagged
and so tired
from taking the red-eye back from
#SfN18
so I could teach today
I went without summer salary for so long when the lab was unfunded, now that it’s available (and budgeted) I have to convince myself that I deserve it.
Several thoughts on this terrible article:
1. Saying you are “humbled” to receive an award is not humblebragging.
2. It is ok to be excited about your successes, even if it makes people sad.
1/2
This sheep escaped a farm and spent 6 years in the mountains, during which time he grew 60 pounds of wool. Wolves tried to eat him, but their teeth could not penetrate the floof. You don't have to turn hard to survive the wolves, just be really, really soft and fluffy.
Next time you go to submit a manuscript, look at your list of suggested reviewers. Have you recommended only white men? If so, do not hit submit. There are WW and POC in your field. Take the extra time to find them and stop perpetuating boys’ clubs.
My personal philosophy is that learning to read papers occurs in stages. Stage 1: late undergrad/early grad school. The goal is simply to understand what claims the paper is making and how they did what they did. Stage 2: grad school. Learn to be hypercritical 1/
Latest maddening grant review (paraphrasing): "Even though you have published evidence that the estrous cycle is not involved in this behavior, it is still necessary to monitor it."