@brendonneuen
Brendon Neuen
2 months
How can we prioritise accelerated therapeutic implementation of the "four pillars" of GDMT for diabetes & CKD? -RASi -SGLT2i -ns-MRA -GLP-1RA @mvaduganathan @KatherineTuttl8 & I outline what an "accelerated, risk-based approach" might look like @CircAHA
Tweet media one
Tweet media two
2
35
101

Replies

@ChristosArgyrop
ChristosArgyropoulos MD, PhD PharmanukerInChief
2 months
@brendonneuen @mvaduganathan @KatherineTuttl8 @CircAHA @georgeinstitute @BrighamFellows @george_clinical Why would one need 3 to 6 months to fully onboard SGLT2I? 3-4 wks are needed to get a new baseline of egfr, then one moves to the nsMRA, which can be prescribed based in CV risk alone. If gfr >45 can start both at the same time. Glp1 can be dropped any time. #pharmanuke
Tweet media one
2
0
7
@brendonneuen
Brendon Neuen
2 months
@ChristosArgyrop @mvaduganathan @KatherineTuttl8 @CircAHA @georgeinstitute @BrighamFellows @george_clinical Completely agree with you - but guidelines & consensus recommendations don't currently advocate such an approach. Instead they suggest monitoring UACR every 3-6 months! Which is not even happening. We need a new framework that prioritises accelerated GDMT uptake for high-risk pts
1
0
5
@DrLMarani
Lisandro Marani
2 months
0
0
0